31 May 2010 · Comments Off on When Good Sprinklers Go Bad · Categories: It Is To Laugh

Sprinkler FAIL


I would never choose to have lawn sprinklers. They just encourage the grass to need cutting.

Let the grass live free! Brown it, don’t drown it!

That’s my motto.

But I’m not my condo association and this isn’t Phoenix. There is water water everywhere in these parts.

31 May 2010 · Comments Off on Dis Coarse Discourse · Categories: Political Theatre

Steve Benen on those complaining that President Obama can’t work magic with BP’s wild well:

At this point, the discourse seems to boil down to

  • a) those who want to see the president don a wetsuit and head to the Gulf floor;
  • b) those who want to see the president don a cape and fly around the planet really quickly in order to reverse time; and
  • c) those who want to see the president pound on podiums and lose his cool, as if that would make a difference. (Thanks, Maureen Dowd, for comparing Obama to Spock again. That never gets old.)

Karen said it well.

31 May 2010 · Comments Off on The Galt and the Lame, Cost Benefit Analysis Dept. · Categories: Political Economy

This Modern World

This Modern World

Via the Brad Blog.

31 May 2010 · Comments Off on Republican Party Doubles Down, Throwing Worse Lies after Bad Dept. · Categories: Republican Lies

The Republican Party ran an ad charging that two Virginia Democratic Congressmen applauded Mexican President Felipe Calderon’s call for the U. S.’s reinstating its ban on assault rifles because a lot of U. S.-sold assault rifles are finding their way into Mexico. President Calderon said this in a speech during his recent visit here.

Turns out that the Congressmen both are on record against reinstating the ban (I think the Congressman are wrong about that but that’s me and they are from Virginia) and that neither one of them attended the speech.

The Republican Party, well, it likes its lie so much it’s just going ahead with it. From Steve Benen (emphasis added):

So, the Virginia Republican Party screwed up. It can happen to anyone. They got a little lazy, chose not to do their due diligence, and ended up looking stupid. They can just pull the dishonest attack ad, and go after Boucher and Perriello over something else.

Except, the state GOP is refusing to back down, and will continue to air the ad the party now knows is wrong. As the Virginia Republican Party sees it, Boucher and Perriello didn’t condemn the speech they didn’t hear, so therefore, it’s fair to suggest they might support the policy they oppose.


This tells us all we need to know about the Republican Party.

It no longer feels the need even to pretend to be truthful.

31 May 2010 · Comments Off on Internal Contradictions · Categories: Republican Hypocrisy

The Boston Globe skewers the silliness of teabaggery:

. . . Tea Partiers and others galvanized by anger over the financial meltdown have somehow ended up embracing candidates who would give Wall Street license to wreak greater havoc. It’s an impressive con job: Candidates whose real agenda is a deregulated market are claiming the mantle of the antibailout movement.

31 May 2010 · Comments Off on The Galt and the Lamers · Categories: Beyond Beyond the Fringe

Roy Edroso reports.

31 May 2010 · Comments Off on The President’s Weekly Address: Memorial Day · Categories: First Looks

Transcript here.

31 May 2010 · Comments Off on Nukes and Oil (Updated) · Categories: Titans of Industry

Karoli at C&L discusses nuking BP’s wild well.

The idea gives me the willies from the git-go. I’m not a physicist, though I know a little bit about physics and a lot about history. Blowing stuff up is seldom an effective choice, though it appeals to the macho and the frustrated and especially the frustrated macho. Blowing it up is their alternative to getting it u–never mind.

A nugget from Karoli’s post:

As I understand it, the goal with any explosive device is to cause the hole to collapse on itself. According to some experts, the problem with conventional explosives is the same problem other solutions are bumping against: this well is so deep and subject to such severe pressure that there’s no empirical evidence available to support or refute the claim conventional explosives would succeed. If they didn’t succeed, the problem might be made even worse.

This is an incredibly frustrating problem, not only because of the draconian measures needed to stop the spillage, but because we’re being asked to take so much on faith when it comes to the steps needed to stop the leak and clear the oil.

  • We’re told dispersants are non-toxic but hazmat suits are needed and the manufacturer’s own instructions recommend they not come in contact with bare skin.
  • We haven’t been told what kind of impact dropping all that mud has, particularly when mixed with oil.
  • We have no idea how long it will take the microbial agents to eat the oil and clear the water.
    We have absolutely no clue as to whether a nuclear device will work and if it does, whether it will do so at the expense of all living things for years to come.
  • Worst of all, no one has any faith in the information we’re receiving from BP, because they have not been forthright with us and appear to be acting in their best interests rather than our own.

I wasn’t a rocket scientist in school, but common sense tells me the nuclear option may not be the best one.

Via Bob Cesca.

Addendum, a cup of coffee later:

Leonard Pitts.

31 May 2010 · Comments Off on QOTD · Categories: QOTD

Alfred E. Wiggam:

A conservative is a man who believes nothing should be done for the first time.

31 May 2010 · Comments Off on The President on the Oil Spill · Categories: First Looks

“Even if the leak were stopped today, it wouldn’t wouldn’t change the fact that these water still contain oil from what is now the largest spill in American history.”

We know now the leak was not stopped. The wild well is still wild.

Remember, BP, not the President, did this thing. I recommend not buying their products.

Transcript here.

31 May 2010 · Comments Off on Memorial Day Request · Categories: Personal Musings

Please say a prayer for my son, currently on his third tour in a war zone, that he remains and honorer of Memorial Day, not an honoree.

30 May 2010 · Comments Off on Colorblinders · Categories: Republican Hypocrisy

Jamelle Bouie points how “colorblind” isn’t:

In an earlier era, this same “colorblind racist philosophy” was used to craft laws targeting African-Americans. Rarely were Jim Crow laws explicitly racist, instead, they relied on “colorblind” mechanisms — like poll taxes and grandfather clauses — to achieve the desired, anti-black outcome. Arizona’s immigration law is obviously not the same as Jim Crow, but it’s animated by the same basic idea of “colorblindness” — if something doesn’t explicitly mention race, then it can’t be racist. And the converse is also true, anything that mentions race is de facto racist, even if it’s designed to ameliorate racial prejudice . . . .

(I remember my daddy talking about paying his poll tax. He was white. He could afford it.)

While the Booman describes how the odious Southern Strategy, which the Republican Party created to capture the South, has captured the Republican Party:

The modern GOP doesn’t have a coherent governing philosophy. But they are more united than ever. Race hatred is central to that unity, . . . .

Read both posts. And weep along with Lincoln.

30 May 2010 · Comments Off on Is That Another Chicken Truck? · Categories: It Is To Laugh

The driver of the chicken truck was ticketed for saturating with fat.

Northbound U.S. 13 was closed for seven hours in Kent County after a tractor-trailer hauling frozen chicken rammed a tank truck, spilling 1,500 gallons of grease and crashing into three other vehicles, police said.

30 May 2010 · Comments Off on Rand Army of the Republic · Categories: Political Theatre

BartCop imagines Libertarianism carried to its logical extreme (warning: it’s brutal satire).

30 May 2010 · Comments Off on Hate in the Name of Love · Categories: First Looks

Gary Dammann at the Guardian considers celibacy, chastity, sex, morality, and Catholicism, but his thoughts can be generalized to Christianity as a whole and, indeed, to all the peoples of the book. A nugget:

This, to my mind, has been Christianity’s greatest single tragedy, turning a religion founded on a noble and genuine philosophy of love into an excuse for repression, oppression and persecution, in which suffering was turned into a cult and hypocrisy into standard practice.