September, 2010 archive
My friend heard on the telly vision this afternoon that we have had 16 inches of rain so far this week.
And three to five more inches are predicted for tonight. From the sound of things, the prediction is not far off.
In Wilmington, Delaware, there is a strong Christian Orthodox presence, reflecting the pattern of immigration (you know about immigration; it’s a word that means, “We’re here; you’re not allowed”). Up the road from my old house was a Ukrainian Orthodox Church.
When they held their annual bazaar, you could get pierogies to die for. (For those of you who have never heard of pierogies, they are sort of eastern European raviolis, usually filled with mashed potatoes or mashed potatoes and onions. You boil them up and, for a true treat, simultaneously fry up some onions and finish by browning the pierogies with the onions. You can sometimes find a pale imitation in the freezer section of your grocery store).
We attended it once, because the Pastor was our neighbor two doors up. The service was two hours of beautiful liturgy, much of it spent standing. The most memorable event was that First Son’s girlfriend of the time fainted from all the standing and incense. She went to the Narthex for a breath and, the next thing we knew, an usher was at our pew whispering, “Your daughter has fainted.” Daughter was standing right there . . . process of elimination and all that.
Anyhoo, in the course of a discussion of the place of archangels as opposed to angels (I took the position that angels were, at best, a metaphor, but that, in Christian tradition, archangels were sort of like the sergeants of angels–sergeants run the Army), I stumbled on the Orthodox Page, which discusses the Orders of Angels.
Sadhbh Walshe writes of counter-intuitive voting in the Guardian. A nugget:
The Republican party recently unveiled their “Pledge to America” in which they outline their plans to address the economic anxiety of the majority of Americans by awarding a $700bn dollar tax cut extension to the wealthy who are thriving and cutting spending on programmes that benefit the rest of the country who are not. What is surprising about this is not the lack of imagination (or shame) displayed in the GOP’s approach to improving prosperity for all Americans, but that so many people who are not themselves well-off support this generous gift to the rich.
The generally accepted explanation of why many Americans, even those that are poor, are opposed to raising taxes for the rich is the enduring belief in upward social mobility or that they may one day be rich themselves. We still believe America is the land of opportunity. You can be born in the ghetto and rise to super stardom. A welfare recipient from a broken home may become president. But the truth is, for the vast majority of people, these dreams are out of reach and, in fact, the US actually has the lowest social mobility of any industrialised nation.
Follow the link and read the whole thing, especially the penultimate paragraph.
Via The Booman.
I know how to fix this:
Due to the concave shape of the Vdara hotel, the strong Nevada sun reflects off its all-glass front and directly onto sections of the swimming pool area below.
The result has left some guests with burns from the powerful rays and even plastic bags have been recorded as melting in the heat.
Remember that creepy
Southwestern Bell Cingular AT&T commercial?
It says the association does this by fining them $50 for repeated violations of an association rule against throwing or hitting balls in the common areas, while no residents without children have received complaints or fines, according to the suit filed in Chesapeake earlier this month.
The association has fined three of the neighborhood’s six families with children – out of 82 housing units – for their children playing football, the suit alleges. It also alleges that children playing outside have been harassed, according to the family that brought the complaint, but doesn’t say by whom.
If you live in a condo, pretty much everything outside your door is “common area,” unless you happen to have, say, an small enclosed patio or yard area, as I did when I lived in Fairlington 30 years ago. In other words, children are forbidden to play ball outside. Playing ball inside is not generally recommended.
The local rag’s resident curmudgeon delivers her opinion here. For once, I pretty much agree with her (she bats about .500 on the “agreeing with Frank” scale).
Fortunately, the condo board where I live is pretty laid back. I made a point of complimenting the new chairman on this when I had to call him yesterday. He thanked me and told me that the board was determined not to be like the one just down the road to the right, which the residents refer to as the “clipboard nazis.”
One of the aspects of human nature that enables cons to succeed is that persons see what they expect to see. (Actually, without any desire for personal gain, I have taken advantage of this aspect of human nature. It does indeed hold true.)
The Slactivist expands on this principle. A nugget:
Tea partiers tend to revere the U.S. Constitution in much the same way that many American evangelicals revere the Bible, which is to say they read it without comprehension, looking only for ammunition that can be used against their enemies. And since neither text was written for such a purpose, this so-called reverence is an exercise in illiteracy.
Read the whole thing.
I was returning to my truck after a bit of shopping when a guy walked up to the car next to me.
He looked at my bumper stickers.
With a sour look, he said, “Phillies, eh?”
I said, “Note this: They’ve gone all season without a single player being arrested.”
He lost the sour look.
In 2006, a real estate columnist for the Philadelphia Inquirer said that a pretty good sign that we were in a housing bubble was that persons were starting to ask whether or not we were in a housing bubble. (I mentioned it at the time.)
Similarly, a pretty good sign that we are quagmired in Afghanistan is that persons are now arguing that we must stay in Afghanistan because we are in Afghanistan.
I disagree with some (not all, especially as regards civil liberties) of his complaints about the Obama administration–last I looked, the Oval Office had rugs, drapes, chairs, and a desk, but no magic wand, but he’s correct about this.
The circular firing squad is getting old.
The issue should be working the vote, not sinking the boat.
But Tangier Island is determined to try:
But the islanders’ way of life is threatened by erosion that takes up to 30 feet of shoreline per year and has reduced Tangier’s size from 2,200 to 730 acres, according to figures cited in a form letter distributed to residents recently to mail to federal and state officials.
About 275 people showed up at a July meeting on the island where the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, at the town council’s invitation, presented an overview of the civil works projects process. The letter campaign began in earnest soon after that meeting.
You remember the Army Corps of Engineers. They’re the folks who did such a good job protecting New Orleans.
Feeding off bridezillas:
In a plea bargain, prosecutors will ask a federal court judge to sentence Karen M. Tucker to a term of 36 to 57 months in prison for defrauding advertisers and bridal vendors into thinking they were paying into a bridal expo at the Hynes Veterans Memorial Convention Center, US Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz said in a statement yesterday.
According to prosecutors, Tucker, 47, pretended to be a company called “The Boston 411,’’ which was booking the convention center for a bridal expo in March.
The article is a little unclear, but it seems as if they were friends before Facebook.
TPM quoting President Obama from his interview in Rolling Stone:
One closing remark that I want to make: It is inexcusable for any Democrat or progressive right now to stand on the sidelines in this midterm election. There may be complaints about us not having gotten certain things done, not fast enough, making certain legislative compromises. But right now, we’ve got a choice between a Republican Party that has moved to the right of George Bush and is looking to lock in the same policies that got us into these disasters in the first place, versus an administration that, with some admitted warts, has been the most successful administration in a generation in moving progressive agendas forward.
The idea that we’ve got a lack of enthusiasm in the Democratic base, that people are sitting on their hands complaining, is just irresponsible…It has been hard, and we’ve got some lumps to show for it. But if people now want to take their ball and go home, that tells me folks weren’t serious in the first place.
Via Bob Cesca.
Even the geeks at Linux Questions dot org are talking about it.
StevenD at the Booman Tribune comments so I don’t have to. A nugget:
When you ban books, you ban speech and you ban ideas. When you ban ideas you effectively neuter our right to free speech, not only for the author of the book but also for those who would choose to read it to discover what they might learn.
Yet, we are faced with a number of candidates on the right for political office this year who would joyfully and wholeheartedly limit your right to read what you want given the opportunity, as well as a number of other rights you now possess or for some, hope to receive. In some states this is already a regular occurrence. Many candidates support the elimination of net neutrality, a threat your ability to access and read the blogs and online publications of your choice.
The Republicans are constantly concerned that Democrats are going to take away their “rights” by which they usually mean the right to own an unregistered handgun or other firearm. Funny, though, how they have so little concern for a freedom that is far more important to our society: the freedom to think what we want, to say what we want and to learn what we want.