From Pine View Farm

No More No-Man’s Zone 0

The Guardian:

On Thursday, the US Supreme Court did what no politician has yet been able to do – it effectively closed Guantanamo. The prison camp still exists, of course, but after Thursday’s landmark Supreme Court ruling, the camp’s raison d’etre has evaporated. The Bush administration self-consciously chose to house its detainees at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base because it thought the location would afford it a “law-free zone.” But now the Supreme Court has ruled that the pre-eminent law of the United States, the Constitution itself, extends to the detainees at Guantanamo. As a result, there is no longer any advantage to keeping the detainees there. In this respect, then, the decision is likely to hasten the closure of the Guantanamo Bay prison. Whether it will bring justice remains to be seen, but it has taken a very big first step, by insisting that the law must apply.

In one sense, the decision in Boumediene v Bush is a limited one. It does not order the release of a single prisoner – indeed, no prisoner has been released by court order in the six years that men have been held at Guantanamo. Nor does it address the scope of the President’s authority to hold individuals as “enemy combatants,” what procedural protections they are owed, or how they should be treated. It simply opens the courthouse door. Six years after Guantanamo opened, detainees will finally get their day in court.

But in every other sense, Thursday’s decision was groundbreaking. For the first time in its history, the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a federal law enacted by Congress and signed by the President on an issue of military policy in a time of armed conflict. The Supreme Court has historically deferred to the President during times of conflict, especially when the President has acted with Congressional assent. For the first time, the court extended constitutional protections to noncitizens held outside US territory during wartime. And for only the third time in its history, the court declared unconstitutional a federal law restricting its own jurisdiction. (The court has typically sought to avoid such confrontations, because in some measure political control of the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction is seen as conferring democratic legitimacy on an unelected institution).

Share

Comments are closed.

From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.