From Pine View Farm

June, 2008 archive

Senator Obama’s VP Choice 0

From the Demon Princess (oh, this is good!):

Your Demon happened to stumble upon Night Line last night just as it was reporting viewers’ responses to the question whether Obama should invite Hillary to serve as his vice-president ~

Answers:

1. Caller: “I won’t vote for him unless he does!”

2. Caller: “Should a boy scout invite/take a rattlesnake into bed with him on his first camping trip?”

While I’m on the subject, there was a great letter to the editor in the local rag today. Perhaps a little more blunt than I might have been, but, oh well (judging by the writer’s name, it was written by a woman). Here’s the crucial excerpt:

A word to the angry women: Hillary Clinton lost . . . ! She couldn’t win fairly; she couldn’t even win dirty. She even tried changing the rules, but she just lost. It’s over. Now, if her supporters want to cut off their noses to spite their faces and vote for a Republican, they will show how monumentally childish they can be – and how incredibly destructive for our country.

Share

McFlip Flop 0

He’s ready to lock us ’em up and throw away the McKey.

Glenn Greenwald:

On Wednesday, I documented John McCain’s complete reversal of views — in the last six months alone — on FISA, warrantless eavesdropping and executive power. McCain’s diametrically opposite views were contained in a questionnaire McCain completed for The Boston Globe last December (wherein he rejected many of the Bush/Cheney theories of presidential omnipotence and warrantless eavesdropping) and then a statement McCain issued this week to National Review (wherein he embraced those same theories in order to persuade the Right that he approves of and would continue Bush’s lawless surveillance policies).

(snip)

There are two critical conclusions highlighted by this episode: (1) whether McCain embraces the Bush/Cheney/Yoo theories of the omnipotent executive is, far and away, one of the most vital questions of the campaign, since the vast bulk of the radicalism and accompanying controversies of the last eight years — from spying to detention to torture to extreme government secrecy — arise out of those theories; despite that fact, those issues have been missing almost entirely from the media’s coverage of the campaign — until now; and (2) despite how central these issues have been, McCain is simply incapable of forming a coherent position on what he thinks about any of this, dramatically changing his answers almost from one day to the next depending on who is asking. This behavior, culminating in his embrace this week of the Bush/Cheney/Yoo theories, severely undermines the two attributes the media relentlessly uses to depict him — his “moderate” ideology and his straight-talking, principled independence.

Share

Bushonomics 3

The facts speak for themselves.

No, Bush and his enablers aren’t responsible for all of this.

Just most of it, through pursuing a war based on lies and selling the economy to foreign powers to pay for it, an oil policy (it is to laugh) based on what enriches oil companies rather than on what averts a most forseeable crisis, and a domestic economic policy based on making the rich richer and the poor poorer.

Whenever the Current Federal Administration has had a chance to plan for the nation’s economic future, it has done precisely the wrong thing.

It’s sorta kinda like their foreign policy, come to think of it.

The U.S. economy entered dangerous new terrain Friday as crude oil prices leapt up by a record $10-plus a barrel, the unemployment rate notched its highest monthly jump in 22 years and growing fears of recession sent the stock market plummeting.

The bleak day began with news from the Labor Department that the unemployment rate ticked up in May by a half-percentage point to 5.5 percent. The last time it jumped so much in one month was in 1986. The Bureau of Labor Statistics also said that employers shed 49,000 jobs, the fifth consecutive month of job losses.

Contracts for deliveries next month of crude oil, called futures, then began climbing because of an escalation of saber-rattling between Israel and Iran, the world’s fourth-largest oil exporter, whose location in the Persian Gulf means that any conflict would likely affect global oil supplies.

By the time trading settled late Friday, oil futures had posted a record one-day move-up of $10.75 a barrel to $138.54. That was nearly twice the record uptick set just one day earlier of $5.49.

Share

Just Another Day at the Office 0

Go to El Reg for the video.

Share

Bushies: Islamofascist Dupes, Islamofascist Fellow Travelers, or Just Warmongering Dopes? (Updated) 0

I’m betting on the last option:

McClatchy (emphasis added):

Defense Department counterintelligence investigators suspected that Iranian exiles who provided dubious intelligence on Iraq and Iran to a small group of Pentagon officials might have “been used as agents of a foreign intelligence service … to reach into and influence the highest levels of the U.S. government,” a Senate Intelligence Committee report said Thursday.

A top aide to then-secretary of defense Donald H. Rumsfeld, however, shut down the 2003 investigation into the Pentagon officials’ activities after only a month, and the Defense Department’s top brass never followed up on the investigators’ recommendation for a more thorough investigation, the Senate report said.

The revelation raises questions about whether Iran may have used a small cabal of officials in the Pentagon and in Vice President Dick Cheney’s office to feed bogus intelligence on Iraq and Iran to senior policymakers in the Bush administration who were eager to oust the Iraqi dictator.

Iran, which was a mortal enemy of Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein and fought a bloody eight-year war with Iraq during his reign, has been the primary beneficiary of U.S. policy in Iraq, where Iranian-backed groups now run much of the government and the security forces.

Addendum, Later That Same Evening:

Oh, yeah, I left out IslamofascistSymps.

Share

“Was It Aye or Nay, Senator” 0

It is hardly a “tired negative attack” to point to a plain fact from the record. Unless, of course, you are McMaverick.

From Fact Check dot org. Follow the link for a the full analysis:

McCain was asked by a New Orleans reporter why he voted twice against an independent commission to investigate the government’s failings before and after Hurricane Katrina, and he incorrectly stated that he had “voted for every investigation.”

McCain actually voted twice, in 2005 and 2006, to defeat a Democratic amendment that would have set up an independent commission along the lines of the 9/11 Commission. At the time of the second vote, members of both parties were complaining that the White House was refusing requests by Senate investigators for information.

The McCain campaign accused the Obama campaign of “tired negative attacks” for pointing out and documenting McCain’s gaffe.

Share

La Plus ca Change . . . . 0

What Digby said.

Share

The 1,000 Years War 2

Mired in Iraq forever!

Delaware Liberal finds a bright side. We can be a colonial power.

Finally. I was afraid that America would never be a colonial power. But now, word comes from a report leaked to The Independent that there is a deal to keep US troops in Iraq indefinitely, irrespective of what the results of the election in November.

(Aside: Of course, Bush is late to the game. The United States has already been a colonial power. Just ask the folks in the Phillipines and Puerto Rico, just to pull two names out of the hat.)

Share

Bushonomics 0

Failure to regulate, because the monied class is always right. Follow the link for the full release:

The seasonally adjusted delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one-to-four-unit residential properties stood at 6.35 percent of all loans outstanding at the end of the first quarter of 2008 on a seasonally adjusted (SA) basis, up 53 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2007, and up 151 basis points from one year ago, according to MBA’s National Delinquency Survey.

The delinquency rate includes loans that are at least one payment past due but does not include loans in the process of foreclosure. The percentage of loans in the foreclosure process was 2.47 percent at the end of the first quarter, an increase of 43 basis points from the fourth quarter of 2007 and 119 basis points from one year ago.

(snip)

The foreclosure start rate differed considerably by loan type. For example:

  • • Prime fixed rate loan foreclosure starts increased 7 basis points to 0.29 percent over the previous quarter and prime ARM foreclosure starts increased 49 basis points to 1.55 percent.
  • • Subprime fixed foreclosure starts increased 28 basis points to 1.80 percent and subprime ARM foreclosure starts increased 106 basis points to 6.35 percent.
  • • FHA foreclosure starts decreased 4 basis points to 0.87 percent and VA foreclosure starts increased 11 basis points to 0.39 percent.

And Duncan expects that bank failures are next on the Bushonomics agenda.

Share

Eye 0

Via kos.

Share

Who Knew? (Updated) 0

Bush lied.

Addendum, Later That Same Day
:

Duncan has a thought.

Share

Stray Thought 0

Publishers Clearing House flyers are perfect for stuffing Republican Party postage paid business reply envelopes.

Share

Looking Back 0

The BBC has a fun little quiz on the Republican and Democratic primary races. Take it here.

Share

Hate Crimes, Hateful Crimes 0

It is difficult to conceive of a hate crime more hateful than this. I want to launch into a tirade, but words fail me.

But the story speaks for itself:

The latest in a series of wicked acts of vandalism – one aimed to harm toddlers at play outside a synagogue – has rallied neighbors in the city’s Mount Airy section to step forward.

Rachel Gross, executive director of the Germantown Jewish Center, stood in a toddlers’ playground at the synagogue at Lincoln Drive and West Ellet Street, and pointed to a half-dozen foot-wide holes dug in the sand.

Shards of glass had been hidden inside.

“Glass was buried all over,” said Gross. “It was clearly intentional. There is no other conclusion than someone did it on purpose, and they did it to hurt children.”

She said the playground has been shut since April 15, when the glass shards – most about two to three inches long – were discovered. The perimeter of the 40- by 35-foot playground is surrounded by yellow caution tape and orange netting to keep children out.

This weekend, members of the community will be joining together to clean up the playground.

Share

Firefox . . . 2

. . . sucks is less than desirable.

I described earlier why I started using Firefox.

Jeez oh man it is so klunky and unreliable. I will allow that it does load certain websites faster than Opera, and it is more tolerant of sites that are not W3C compatible (but, frankly, Opera’s insistence on W3C compatibility is one of the things that has endeared it to me over the years). But Firefox sucks is less than desirable.

I’d start using Konqueror but for on thing: Mouse gestures. Firefox has an addon that lets me use them, though it has nowhere near Opera’s mouse gesture capability.

When I’m writing a blog post, it does funny things to my highlighting; it gives me problems I’ve never had with a real browser. (If you saw the “Milestones” post before I fixed it, you know what I mean.)

I can’t wait till I have to time to rid myself of this beast.

Share

Drumbeats 1

War.

More war.

They love war.

War makes them feel like men.

It’s their Viagra:

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is expected to use his White House visit today to push President Bush to take a more aggressive approach toward Iran — and there are some signs that he’ll have a receptive audience.

Both Olmert and Bush are badly wounded and looking for salvation. Olmert is facing corruption allegations that could drive him from office. Bush is wildly unpopular, desperate to salvage his legacy and fighting irrelevance as the general election begins in earnest — with even the Republican candidate trying to keep him at a distance.

It’s in this environment that the Jewish Telegraph Agency reports: “Ehud Olmert will urge President Bush to prepare an attack on Iran, an Israeli newspaper reported.

“Citing sources close to the Israeli prime minister, Yediot Achronot reported on its front page Wednesday that Olmert, who is due to hold closed-door talks with Bush in Washington, will say that ‘time is running out’ on diplomatic efforts to curb Iran’s nuclear program.

Share

John McCain Is a NeoConservative Hack 0

Glenn Greenwald:

In order to satisfy the right-wing extremists he now needs, McCain — who only six months ago was giving answers on spying and executive power that were exactly the same as though expressed by the ACLU, Russ Feingold and Chris Dodd — is now spouting theories of the Omnipotent President virtually equivalent to those used by John Yoo, David Addington and Dick Cheney over the last seven years to impose radical changes in how our Government functions. How far McCain has shifted is reflected by the fact that, in the December questionnaire, he said he would never use signing statements under any circumstances — a commitment not even Obama or Clinton would make. A speech McCain delivered to the Federalist Society a few weeks ago presaged this reversal, but yesterday’s statement leaves no doubt that McCain is now explicitly embracing the Bush administration’s most radical executive power theories.

The bulk of the Bush controversies over the last seven years are grounded in the Bush/Cheney view of executive power: that when it comes to national security, war and foreign policy (so broadly defined that it even includes what the Government does to U.S. citizens, on U.S. soil), nothing can constrain what the President does — not even laws enacted by the American people through their Congress. John McCain is now embracing those extremist theories in full. The only difficult question is to decide what’s more disturbing: that McCain switches positions so quickly and completely on such fundamental questions, or that he is now espousing a view of presidential power that has fueled the radicalism and lawlessness of the last seven years?

Share

Milestones 0

A couple of weeks ago, I found my copy of Green and Gold. That was the directory of incoming freshmen that rising sophomores at my college prepared. We freshman received it when we arrived for orientation.

Second Son was looking at it yesterday. One thing he remarked on (in addition to the freaky haircuts and funny clothes you will see in high school senior portraits from the late 1960’s) was the very small number of black persons, maybe three or four–we called them “colored” or “Negroes” back then–in the incoming class of about 700
persons.

I pointed out to him that, just a few years before, the college had been all white.

Fortunately, he is from a new generation. He doesn’t care about color.

Will Bunch’s post on Senator Obama’s achievement is just too good–and for those or us who lived through it, black, white, yellow, red, or purple, too true–to ignore.

Addendum, a Few Minutes Later:

Dick Polman has more:


When Obama was born on August 4, 1961, southern blacks could not sit with white patrons at lunch counters, or drink from the same water fountains, or use the same public toilets, or sit where they wanted on buses. They were routinely denied the right to vote. Civil rights workers known as Freedom Riders, who rode buses across state lines to protest segregation in transportation, were often dragged from the vehicles that spring and summer, and beaten with tire irons. Even accomplished black citizens got little respect; when NAACP lawyer Thurgood Marshall met that spring with attorney general Robert Kennedy to discuss the possibility of being nominated for a federal appeals court seat, RFK told him, “That’s the problem with you people. You want too much too fast.”

Share

Speeches 0

I’m not going to bother to discuss the last night’s speeches by Senators McCain and Obama. But Brendan has a great commentary:

As Christina and I listened to the speech we kept waiting for Senator Clinton, the losing candidate, to say “…and the best way to achieve these goals today is to unify our party and support the winner of the Democratic Primary, Senator Barack Obama.” We never heard those words: instead, we watched the losing candidate try to upstage the winning candidate. And this person wants to be vice-president? She doesn’t even have the class to bow out gracefully, how could she be expected to embrace an office charitably described as “not worth a bucket of warm piss” without constantly upstaging the President? It was a classless and tasteless move. I don’t know what the hell she was thinking.

The difference between the two speeches was stark: where Clinton riled up her supporters with implications that she’s not done yet (she certainly didn’t concede) by arguing that she got the popular vote (which again, isn’t what’s important in the primary), Mr. Obama was gracious in victory . . . .

Share

John McCain Is a Conservative Hack 0

The Nation:

More than a decade ago McCain voted against the Telecommunications Act of 1996, which gave the green light to media consolidation. He also loudly opposed the efforts of commercial broadcasters to quash low-power noncommercial FM broadcasting in 2000. Progressives applauded in both cases. But as chair of the all-important Senate Commerce Committee, which was responsible for implementation of the Telecom Act, the Arizona senator resisted numerous opportunities to mitigate its worst excesses. The hallmarks of McCain’s “leadership” have been: (1) a failure to promote the public interest; (2) hypocritical pro-consumer rhetoric that hides pro-business action; (3) a fundamental misunderstanding of technology and economics; and (4) troubling, at times scandalous, loyalty to particular special interests.

While most of the attention to February’s New York Times investigation of McCain’s relationship with Vicki Iseman focused on speculation about romantic entanglement, shockingly little attention was paid to the revelation that in 1999 McCain had, as Commerce Committee chair, pressured the FCC to issue a critical TV station license to Paxson Communications, for whom Iseman was lobbying. McCain’s approach was so aggressive and so out of bounds even for corporate-cozy Washington that then-FCC chair William Kennard complained about the senator’s attempted intervention. Paxson’s executives and lobbyists contributed more than $20,000 to McCain’s 2000 presidential campaign, and its CEO lent McCain the company’s jet at least four times for campaign travel. The senator’s symbiotic relationship with Paxson and telecom giants like AT&T is rarely mentioned on the Straight Talk Express.

Also unmentioned is the crucial role McCain played in shaping the Bush-era FCC. It was McCain who personally and aggressively promoted Michael Powell (see note–ed.) to serve as FCC chair, and who defended Powell’s attempts in 2003 to rewrite media ownership rules according to a script written by industry lobbyists. While other senators objected to those rule changes after more than 2 million Americans communicated their opposition, McCain sought to preserve them. And he remains joined at the hip with Powell, who unabashedly thinks the job of government is to promote the interests of the largest communication firms. In May Powell represented the McCain campaign on a panel discussion at the annual conference of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association.

It is unlikely that McCain would reappoint the disgraced Powell as chair. But it is reasonably certain he would appoint someone who shares Powell’s deafness to the pleadings of public interest. The senator’s 2006 vote against maintaining net neutrality suggests that his commitment to the business objectives of AT&T outweigh any commitment to the public interest. Straight-talk soundbites notwithstanding, McCain will be a reactionary force on media issues across the board.

Note: Follow this link to learn more about Mr. “What Big Media Wants Big Media Gets” Powell.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.