Author's archive
Design for Despotism 0
Mrs. Betty Bowers, America’s Best Christian, comments on Trump’s alleged lack of knowledge of Project 2025.
The Crypto Con 0
Now, it’s coming after your pension fund (assuming, of course, that you even have a pension fund in this New Gilded Age).
All That Is Old Is New Again 0
Trump plays his trump card: Birtherism all over again, and it’s just as phony the second time around.
Twits Own Twitter X Offenders
0
Farron discusses self-declared “free speech absolutist” Elon Musk’s decision to shut down speech he doesn’t like because he can.
Olympic-Grade Weirdos 0
Grung_e_Gene points out that the gaming has begun.
“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0
. . . and, as we all know, politeness is a family value.
Recommended Viewing 0
It’s a gripping tale, but you should know that it is also a dark one.
I’m watching it on Tubi.
Also on Tubi, you might want to check out Colonel March of Scotland Yard. Boris Karloff plays Colonel March. It’s fun to watch him play the good guy.
A Moment of Truth (Telling) 0
Cliff comments on Gretchen Whitmer’s response to Donald Trump.
Tracking the Record 0
Reacting to Donald Trump’s tantrum at the National Association of Black Journalists, the editorial board of the Las Vegas Sun takes a long, detailed look at his track record on race.
No surprises, but, when it’s all collected in one place, it’s–er–rather disquieting.
Welfare Queen Redux 0
Sam and the crew point out that the party of New Secesh just can’t keep themselves from letting their racist flag fly.
The Candidates Debase 0
Garrett Epps, writing for the Washington Monthly, reveals the lost eighth debate between Abraham Lincoln and Frederick Douglas.
Give it a read and see whether or not it presaged dis coarse discourse.
Methinks you will find it quite timely.
The Entitlement Society 0
Boy, if this isn’t a manifestation of the entitlement society, I don’t know what is.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
At Psychology Today Blogs, Marc Wittmann argues that, as far as AI is concerned, the “Singularity” remains a fever dream He makes three main points, the most important being that hardware cannot evolve. Follow the link, where he explores each one.
Some scientists and philosophers have the opinion that artificial intelligence could one day become conscious.
A computer remains the same physical structure from one moment to the next.
A living organism, in contrast, is never the same entity from one moment to the next.
Afterthought:
Mechanical processing speed is indeed impressive, but it’s not the same thing as intelligence.
