From Pine View Farm

America’s Concentration Camps category archive

Dishonor (Updated) 1

I could probably improve on the essay below, but it’s not worth the effort.

I’m so disgusted I could spit.

But I’m not surprised.

On second thought, I don’t feel disgusted.

I feel soiled.

Soiled by what these thugs have done in your name, in my name, in our name.

None Dare Call It Torture

The New York Times stops just short of using the “T word,” preferring to call it “severe interrogations.” But let’s not beat around the bush: Alberto Gonzales’ Justice Department secretly approved torture — even as it told the rest of the world it didn’t, and as Congress was passing laws to ban torture

In a long investigative piece, the Times digs up two classified opinions issued by the department under Gonzales’ reign to prove it.

The first, issued soon after Gonzales’ arrival as attorney general in 2005, for the first time provided “explicit authorization to barrage terror suspects with a combination of painful physical and psychological tactics, including headslapping, simulated drowning and frigid temperatures.”

(That “simulated drowning,” by the way, is the technique known as waterboarding: “pouring water over a bound prisoner’s cloth-covered face to induce fear of suffocation.”)

Meanwhile, the department’s official stand to the public was the one it issued in 2004, calling torture “abhorrent.”

Later in 2005, as Congress moved toward outlawing “cruel, inhuman and degrading” treatment, the Justice Department issued another secret opinion declaring that none of the C.I.A. interrogation methods violated that standard.

If they didn’t violate that standard, they at least produced some of the tainted results torture often yields: confessions to crimes the confessor probably didn’t commit.

When the C.I.A. caught Khaid Sheikh Mohammed, the chief planner of the Sept. 11 attacks, interrogators were “haunted by uncertainty.” They used a variety of “tough interrogation tactics” about 100 times over two weeks on the man known as K.S.M., and got all kinds of confessions. The problem is, intelligence officers say that “many of Mr. Mohammed’s statements proved exaggerated or false.”

Reacting to the Times story, a White House spokeswoman said: “Our intelligence agencies legally obtain information. This country does not torture.”

The only way they can say “This country does not torture” is that they call it something else. Like Ralph or Fred or Betty.

That’s it. “Let’s take them to the Ralph room.”

Addendum, Later That Same Evening:

ASZ.

Upyernoz.

Share

Morally Clueless (Updated) (Updated Again) 0

President Bush announced new sanctions Tuesday against the military dictatorship in Myanmar, accusing it of imposing “a 19-year reign of fear” that denies basic freedoms of speech, assembly and worship.

(snip)

“In Belarus, North Korea, Syria and Iran, brutal regimes deny their people the fundamental rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration” of the United Nations.

This appeal against “brutal regimes” comes from the same bunch who gave the world Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo Bay, and “black sites,” and who made “waterboarding” a household word.

The hypocrisy is sick-making.

Where’s my Maalox?

Addendum, Later that Same Day:

Judgement at Northwest Washington.

Judging from the internal evidence of the tape and the reference to the upcoming election, it seems like a done deal.

The perps walk.

Via Brendan.

McClatchy, via Atrios.

Share

The Bright Side of Torture 0

There must be some reason the Current Federal Administration likes it so much:

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.