First Looks category archive
Courting Disaster 0
Recently, the Supreme Supremacist Court ruled that Alabama had to redraw its House districts because black persons, who make up a quarter of the state’s population, were under represented. Instead of one majority black district, said the Court, there must be at least two. Alabama has indeed redrawn its districts, once more with only one majority black district, ignoring the Court’s ruling.
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Gene Collier has a theory as to why:
See, there is no judicial branch, and thus no Supreme Court. So if you hear from SCOTUS on something, you can comply, don’t comply, up to you.
Follow the link for the complete article.
Blame Gamers 0
At the Kansas City Star, Jessica Piper cautions that, if you’re going to point the finger of blame, you should point it in the right direction.
Imagineering 0
At the Portland Press-Herald, James Bilancia ponders the power of imagined grievances.
Recommended Listening 0
I read this book multiple times back in the olden days, when I was a young ‘un.
It’s just as good now as it was then.
Break Time 0
Off to drink liberally.
Recommended Listening 0
The Window at the White Cat, by Mary Roberts Rinehart.
The reader is exceptionally skilled, and Mary Roberts Rinehart should be remembered much more than she is. She was an excellent writer.
Recommended Viewing 0
I gather that it did not do well at the box office, but we found it an excellent film. Look for it on your movie channels.
Courting Disaster 0
Robert Reich argues that the current Supreme Supremacist Court has gutted the legal concept of “standing,” that is, of who under the law has the capacity to bring suit in court. Here’s a bit of his article:
Bad enough that three of the justices now in the majority were appointed by a man who lost the popular vote, who was impeached twice, and who promoted an insurrection against the United States. And two others were appointed by a man who also lost the popular vote and led the nation into war in Iraq under false pretenses.
Now that the court has obliterated the guardrail on what it can consider, there are no limits to what this least democratic branch of government — and its extremist majority — might do.
Still Rising Again after All These Years 0
Oklahoma State Superintendent of Schools moves to whitewash (I choose that term advisedly) Oklahoma’s history.
Numbers Gaming 0
At Psychology Today Blogs, Christopher J. Ferguson makes a strong case that the recent dip in school children’s test scores on the NEAP standardized test was not nearly so severe nor so alarming as depicted by (some) press reports and politicians. He points out:
When we look at the official charts released for the NAEP, we can see a small 4-point drop in reading and a larger 9-point drop in math.
. . . even across 5 decades, scores overall didn’t change very much. For reading, scores improved slightly over time before becoming largely static since 2012, then dropping a bit during Covid. Math scores improved a bit more, then dropped a tiny bit since 2012, then more rapidly during Covid. Since scores can range 500 points, how worrisome is a drop of 4 or even 9 points?
Follow the link for his answer to his (admittedly rhetorical) question.
(Broken link fixed.)







