From Pine View Farm

Geek Stuff category archive

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Trustworthy? I got a bridge in Brooklyn you can buy.

Share

The Enemy Below 0

On the roof, persons frolic in the social media fun park.  Underneath, social media companies undermine democracy, fuel polarization and disinformation, and mine user data, all for profit.

Click to view the original image.

One more time, “social” media isn’t.

Share

The Crypto Con 0

Froma Harrop explains how it works. A snippet:

Bitcoin’s price is fueled by the Greater Fool Theory — that the fool who buys it needs only find a bigger fool to pay more for it than he did. That’s how Beanie Baby mania worked.

Follow the link for details.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Without precedent? Just ask these lawyers.

Share

The Neglected Neighborhood on the Back Streets of the Disinformation Superhighway 0

Picture of a street with a sign bearing a glowering Donald Trump and reading

Click to view the original image.

Share

DOGE Ball 0

Security maven Bruce Schneier looks at how Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (which, incidentally, is not a government department in any legitimate sense of the term) has compromised federal computer systems and concludes that it can legitimately be considered a cyberattack on “the sinews of government.”

Here is a little bit from his article:

But the most alarming aspect isn’t just the access being granted. It’s the systematic dismantling of security measures that would detect and prevent misuse—including standard incident response protocols, auditing, and change-tracking mechanisms—by removing the career officials in charge of those security measures and replacing them with inexperienced operators.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Larcenous? You be the judge.

Caption:  Algorithm & Blues.  Image:  Robot holding a guitar and saying,

Click to view the original image.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

As trustworthy as that phone call telling you that you owe money to Walmart when you haven’t set foot in a Walmart in a decade?* You should be so lucky.

_______________

*Based on a real life experience.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Seductively manipulative? Darn tootin.

That’s why Bruce Schneier favors truth in packaging:

A person can be a friend. An AI cannot be a friend, despite how people might treat it or react to it. AI is at best a tool, and at worst a means of manipulation. Humans need to know whether we’re talking with a living, breathing person or a robot with an agenda set by the person who controls it. That’s why robots should sound like robots.

Follow the link for his reasoning.

(Slightly edited for more snark 2025-02-05 14:17 EST.)

Share

“Just the Fakes, Ma’am” 0

Security maven Bruce Schneier takes a look at why fact-checking fake memes on “social” media seems futile. A nugget:

People share as a form of social signaling. I send you a meme/article/clipping/photo to show that we are on the same team. Whether it is true, or misinformation, or actual propaganda, is of secondary importance. Sometimes it’s completely irrelevant. This is why fact checking doesn’t work.

Share

Addicted to Screens 0

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Up in your business? Darn tootin’.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

The dialog, spoken by a policeman: No fixed address.

The closed caption: I’ll fix the dress.

The dialog (in the same episode): Nottingham Shire?

The closed caption: Knotting, I’m sure.

The intelligence: Artificial.

The stupid: Real.

Share

The Crypto Con in This New Gilded Age 0

Here’s the lede, via Truthout. Follow the link for the details

A Bitcoin advocacy group pushing President-elect Donald Trump to stockpile massive amounts of cryptocurrency and state-level efforts to do the same is run by fossil fuel operatives fighting to eliminate environmental regulations, including the author of the Project 2025 proposal to dismantle the Environmental Protection Agency.

Not that those pushing crypto might have any ulterior motives . . . .

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Michael Patrick Lynch argues that, given the reach of Facebook and its sister “social” media apps, the Zuckerborg’s decision to eschew fact-checking has serious implications for the future of democracy. He cites Hanna Arendt:

As philosopher Hannah Arendt observed in The Origins of Totalitarianism, authoritarian propaganda thrives on “extreme contempt for facts as such, for in their opinion, fact depends entirely on the power of the man who can fabricate it” (Arendt, 1951). In other words, it is in an authoritarian’s self-interest to undermine the idea that anyone else besides themselves can “fact-check” or say what’s true and what’s false.

Follow the link for his arguments.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Infallible? I got a bridge for sale in Brooklyn, sucker.

Security maven Bruce Schneier offers some thoughts how to deal with AI mistakes.

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm, Disinformation Superhighway Dept. 0

Image of words

Click to view the original image.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Zeynep Tufekci offers a theory as to why Mark Zuckerberg seems to have thrown his lot in with Donald Trump (while simultaneously getting rid of fact-checking). Here’s the gist:

Zuckerberg told (podaster Joe–ed.) Rogan that “one of the things that I’m optimistic about with President Trump is I think he just wants America to win.” And then he got to the heart of the matter: He suggested that Trump use the power of the U.S. government to defend Meta abroad — for instance, from the huge fines that the European Union has imposed on it for violating data privacy and antitrust rules.

Follow the link for context.

Share

Have You Been Assimilated by the Zuckerborg?
Do You Want To Free Yourself?
0

My friend got a message yesterday from a friend informing her that said friend was leaving Facebook “because facts matter.”

Coincidentally, this appeared in my feeds:

the EFF offers some pointers as to how to dis-assimilate oneself from the Zuckerborg.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Truthful? Let Beloit professor Robin Zebrowski answer that:

. . . AI has no concept of truth.

Follow the link for the context of that statement.

Share