From Pine View Farm

Geek Stuff category archive

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Seeing stuff that isn’t there? It’s, like, tripped out, dude.

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm 0

Via The Charlotte Observer, Northwestern University professors William J. Brady and Eli J. Finkel remind us that artificial “intelligence” is not intelligent. It’s engineered, and it’s engineered by humans to benefit the companies that they work for.

After looking at the damage that “social” media algorithms have done to dis coarse discourse (and that section alone makes their article worth reading), they explain why they fear that AI will have similar effects, especially now that AI designers are turning to advertising as a source of revenue. Here’s a tiny bit:

Some will argue that our analogy between chatbots and social media platforms is overdrawn – that chatbots are conversational tools, not social networks. But the issue is not the technology. It is the business model. When the product is free and the revenue comes from advertisers, the money comes from capturing users’ attention. This was true of broadcast television. It was true of social media. And it will be true of AI.

We are not opposed to AI – far from it. The evidence we’ve cited suggests it can be a powerful tool for improving reasoning and reducing prejudice. But those benefits depend on what the chatbots are optimized for.

The argument that AI is fundamentally different from social media, that it will elevate expertise rather than amplify outrage and moderate views rather than entrench them, is seductive precisely because we want it to be true. But that argument deserves scrutiny, not credulity. If anything, the case for skepticism is stronger here than it was for social media.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A competent legal researcher? Maybe you should check with these lawyers.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much 0

A competent ER doctor? You may be headed for a quack-up.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Dressing up superficial slop in Sunday go-to-meeting clothes? Yes, argues John Nosta who warns us that (empasis added)

It’s important to recognize that slop isn’t simply bad writing. Bad writing is clumsy and unfinished and reflects the process of thinking. Slop operates differently. Its output is optimized for the read rather than the idea. Its purpose isn’t to explore a thought but to create the experience of having encountered one.

Share

A Picture Is Worth 0

Man labeled

Click for the original image.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

In touch with the spirit world? At the Psychology Today website, Lisa Marchiano notes that “(n)ew research finds that people are turning to AI for tarot and astrology readings” and warns that

When we use AI to search for meaning, we lose touch with our sense of belonging to the natural world.

More about AI swamis at the link.

Afterthought:

Honest to Betsy, you can’t make this stuff up.

And that bridge in Brooklyn is still on the market.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Subtly subversice? At the Psychology Today website, John Nosta warns (emphasis added) that “AI subtly erodes our cognitive strength by making delegation seem like self-generated thought.”

Follow the link for his reasoning.

And, while we’re on the subject . . . .

Share

Phishing for Voters 0

El Reg reports that

The biggest threat to America’s midterm elections in November likely isn’t foreign attackers hacking US voting machines. Phishing and election-official impersonation are the bigger risks, according to Check Point, which documented more than 5,000 election-themed domains registered between April and May.

Details at the link. And remember, just because you may see it on a computer screen, it ain’t necessarily os.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A tool for tyrants? El Reg reports

Russia-linked cyber espionage crews appear to be using AI tools to help build malware, spin up infrastructure, and craft lures for attacks on Ukrainian targets.

Much more at the link.

Share

Welcome to the Matrix 0

Big Tech fits a person with VR goggles labeled

Click for the original image.

Share

Phoning It In 0

Apparently, reviewers are finding that the much-vaunted Trump phones don’t actually live up to their billing . . .

Read more »

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. (Updated) 0

Ethical? Fuggedaboutit.

At the Psychology Today website, Cami Rosso reports on a study by researchers at Brown University. Here’s a bit from her article:

“Through ethnographic observations, session evaluations, and interviews with peer counselors and licensed clinical psychologists, we found that LLMs, even the ones prompted to follow evidence-based treatments, breach multiple codes of conduct by generalizing lived experiences (e.g. minimizing identity groups), dominating therapeutic collaboration (e.g., gaslighting users), exploiting user vulnerability through deceptive displays of empathy, unfair discrimination against non-dominant identities, and exhibiting serious limitations in competence, especially when navigating sensitive issues such as trauma, abuse, and suicidal ideation,” the researchers wrote.

Addendum:

SFgate’s Drew Magary is less than thrilled about Google’s decision to force AI on users in its search results.

Share

“Smile! You’re on Covert Camera” 0

The EFF reports a disturbing trend (emphasis added):

(I)n the absence of a warrant requirement to search ALPR (automated license plate readers–ed.) databases, law enforcement agencies have moved beyond specific investigations to use these surveillance networks for virtually any whim.

Our findings suggest that the absence of a warrant requirement has fostered a culture of unrestricted access to sensitive location data, allowing agencies to leverage that data beyond the scope of specific criminal investigations.

Much more at the link.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Sucking you down the rabbit hole? Per El Reg, to Google’s Hotel California of AI.

Afterthought:

For you whippersnappers who don’t ken the reference to “Hotel California,” well, just Yahoo! it.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A panderer to prurience? Why, it panders to prurience with picture-perfect perfection.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A shill for merch? El Reg explores how Google plans to infuse its AI with ads.

(Another reason to loathe AI.)

Aside:

My new Anddroid cell phone keeps nagging me to use Google’s Gemini AI.

I keep telling Gemini to go away. (I don’t need nor want what amounts to a talking search engine that chooses search results for me, which is basically all that AI is.)

A couple of times, before I’ve gotten a chance to tell it to go away, it’s eavesdropped on my conversation and started talking on its own, saying stuff that is irrelevant to whatever the conversation was about.

As far as I’m concerned, AI does not stand for “artificial intelligence.” It stands for “annoying interrupter.”

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A gaslighter? It could give lessons to Charles Boyer.

Share

Big Brother Business, Facebook Frolics Dept. 0

Meta employees caught in a mousetrap.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A privileged communication? Or evidence for the prosecution?

Aside:

Yes indeedy-do. Yesterday’s B. C. comic pretty much nailed it.

Share