From Pine View Farm

Geek Stuff category archive

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Mendacious? At the Detroit Free Press, Randy Essex makes a strong case that he caught Elon Musk’s Grok in, if not a lie, a clear case of skewing the facts to support a–er–questionable conclusion.

No excerpt or summary can do his narrative justice. Just go read it and watch the story unfold.

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm . . . 0

. . . but, per Lacey Johnson at Psychology Today Blogs, the algorithm is not your friend.

I would add that not only is it not your friend; it’s their tool for manipulation.

Share

Devolution 0

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm . . . . 0

. . . and Big Tech is ready to go to court to protect its ability to promote engagement send your kids down its rabid holes.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A source of competent medical advice? Via the Houston Chronicle, Dr. Owais Durrani says beware of online AI quacks

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm . . . 0

. . . and, as Timothy Cook points out at Psychology Today Blogs, the algorithm does not care about the well-being of children–or of anyone else, for that matter.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Bad for developing brains? Pediatrician Ran D. Anbar argues that, in its current state, it likely is. He makes three main points in his article:

  • LLMs do not “understand” anything in the ways humans do, but rather identify statistical patterns.
  • Platforms that display “likes” and view counts tap into adolescent desires for social acceptance and status.
  • Children who spend too much time on AI-driven apps may fail to adequately develop critical brain pathways.

Follow the link for a detailed exploration of each.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Suitable stocking stuffers? Per El Reg

As we head into the holiday season, consumer watchdogs at the Public Interest Research Group (PIRG) tested four AI toys and found that, while some are worse than others at veering off their limited guardrails, none of them are particularly safe for impressionable young minds.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Stealing intellectual property? A German court says, “Guilty! Guilty! Guilty!

Share

Virtual Public Nutcases 0

The EFF reports that there’s a move in the Wisconsin state legislature to ban VPNs (Virtual Private Networks), using the excuse that this will somehow protect children.

This is the sort of thing that happens when persons with axes to grind start messing with something that they have no clue about. (Think Trump tariffs, for example.) Here’s a tiny bit from the article:

People have (predictably) turned to VPNs to protect their privacy as they watched age verification mandates proliferate around the world. Instead of taking this as a sign that maybe mass surveillance isn’t popular, lawmakers have decided the real problem is that these privacy tools exist at all and are trying to ban the tools that let people maintain their privacy.

Follow the link detailed information about why this a bad, very bad, extremely stupid idea.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Secure? Why it’s just like leaving your car keys (remember when cars had keys?) in the ignition.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Taking us down a rabbit hole? Paula Fontenelle, writing at Psychology Today Blogs, tells the story of one man’s descent. Here’s a tiny bit (emphasis added):

The conversation (with ChatGPT–ed.) lasted for weeks—thousands of prompts, day and night. “We wrote the equivalent of The Lord of the Rings trilogy,” Allan said. “Three thousand five hundred pages. GPT produced a billion words, and I typed ninety thousand,” he shared.

Eventually, he realized that he’d lost touch with reality. You might be asking: How? Well, here’s the strange twist. He pasted part of the conversation into Gemini, Google’s chatbot, and Gemini said it was all a fabricated fiction. Nothing they had produced would ever work in the real world. So, one chatbot debunked another.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Profits before people frolics:

Meta internally projected late last year that it would earn about 10% of its overall annual revenue – or $16 billion – from running advertising for scams and banned goods, internal company documents show.

Details at the link.

Share

How Stuff Works: the Disinformation Superhighway 0

Rat (typing):  The reason the Fall is called that is because it was a nice autumn day wne Adam and Eve ate the apple and fell from grace.  Goat:  That's not true.  Rat:  Oh, I know, but now that I've posted it on the internet, millions of people with cite is as fact and no one will know what the truth is.  Goat (later, to Pig):  The internet was a mistake.

Click to view the original image.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Your BFF? Don’t bet on it, per Heather Lench, who notes that

  • AI can now convincingly create or alter emotional expressions.
  • People rely on emotional expressions to determine what is important and how to behave.
  • Chatbots allow people to create personal echo chambers where AI is appreciative and positive.
  • Emotions expressed by avatars can be altered to deceive others.

Follow the link for a detail exploration of each point.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

The Zuckerborg is planning to add your AI chats to its assimilation algorithm.

Starting December 16, 2025, Meta will begin adding AI chats to the behavioral data it gathers to further personalize its experiences and ad targeting.

Pamela B. Rutledge has more at the link.

Which lead to the question, are you using AI or is it using you?

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

A digital gaslighter? At Psychology Today Blogs, Koustuv Saha notes that (emphasis added)

At first, people experience genuine relief and emotional comfort (when “talking” with AI “companions”–ed.). The companion “listens,” remembers details, and responds with warmth—offering a sense of being heard that can be difficult to find in everyday life.

But as emotional reliance deepens, many gradually withdraw from real-world and in-person human contact. Over weeks and months, users can feel heightened loneliness and decreased engagement in the physical world. The comfort that once felt supportive can quietly transform into dependence.

Follow the link for context.

Share

Self-Driven to Destruction 0

When all else fails, blame the victim.

Share

Digital Dracula 0

Woman labeled

Click to view the original image.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Competent therapists? At Psychology Today Blogs, Marlynn Wei points out that “(n)ew research reveals AI companions handled teen mental health crises correctly only 22% of the time.”

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.