From Pine View Farm

Geek Stuff category archive

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much,
Dis Coarse Discourse Dept.
0

At her blog at Psychology Today, Marlynn Wei explores the who benefits from AI lies and deep fakes. A snippet:

This climate of powerful generative AI has brought about a phenomenon called the “liar’s dividend,” which describes the benefit to those who claim that anything is fake, even objective evidence.

In a world of AI-generated videos and audio, the liar’s dividend benefits people who use this technology to dispute and raise skepticism about objective evidence; in other words, a strategy to deny reality.

I commend the entire article to your attention.

Share

Facebook Frolics, No News Is No News Dept. 0

Bloomberg tech columnist Dave Lee explains why the Zuckerborg is turning its algorithms away from promoting news content. A snippet:

Beginning with the fallout from the election of Donald Trump as president, promoting the news became more trouble for Facebook than it was worth — though it’s only now that it dares say it out loud. Turning its back on news during the Trump years would have been seen as giving up on the truth. Meta was trapped in a cycle: With legitimate news came fake news. With fake news came the need to moderate. And with the need to moderate came the accusations of bias. Depending on whom you asked, Facebook was either censoring or pandering to the right. A Trending Topics team brought the company into disrepute and was eventually disbanded. Congress vented its fury.

(snip)

So now Meta has decided it’s had enough. It’s not that news isn’t allowed — Canada excluded — but that Meta doesn’t feel it’s in its interests to support news organizations the way it once did.

Read the whole thing. It reinforces the obvious: “social” media isn’t.

Afterthought:

Indeed, I think an argument can be made that “social” media in the hands of companies motivated primarily, if not exclusively, by their bottom lines is anti-social media, as it is inclined to give persons what they want to hear, not what they need to hear.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

The Learning and Implicit Processes Lab at Ghent University takes a look at the current state of ChatGPT (and Large Language Models in general) and concludes (emphasis added):

Returning to the question of ChatGPT’s intelligence, it is important to note that it was developed with a specific purpose: to interact with humans through a computer interface and produce coherent answers to whatever prompt it gets. With that goal in mind, its performance is remarkable.

It was not designed to be generally intelligent (i.e., capable of flexibly adapting to novel situations or problems), and it isn’t. Still, it gives us the illusion of intelligence because it mimics intelligent human language.

Follow the link for their reasoning.

Share

It’s All about the Algorithm 0

Those friends served to you by the algorithm, well, remember, there may not be much there there.

One more time, “social” media isn’t.

You don’t use it.

It uses you.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Atrios makes a pretty good case that, if history is not precisely repeating itself, it is certainly echoing loudly.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

Computer security expert Bruce Schneier has written another long and detailed exploration of the current kerfuffle over AI.

In the light of all the real stupid billed as “artificial intelligence (for example), it is a timely and worthwhile read.

Share

The Disinformation Superhighway 0

Don’t believe that “digital assistant.”

It will lie to you.

Aside:

Personally, I wouldn’t invite a spybot (or a vehicle for spybots) into my house on a bet.

But that’s just me.

Share

Robot’s Rules of Order 0

At the Psychology Today website, John Nasta muses on how Isaac Asimov’s “Three Laws of Robotics” might be applied to today’s AI Chatbots and Large Language Models.

Aside:

When I was a young ‘un, back in the olden days, Asimov was easily my favorite sci-fi author.

Share

Geeking Out 0

Debian Sid with the Fluxbox window manager on a ThinkPenguin laptop. Firefox and KeePassxc are shaded*. The wallpaper is from my collection.

Screenshot

Click for a larger image.

Aside:

Debian Sid (aka “Debian Unstable”) is more stable than many Linux distributions’ (aka distros’) stable.

I now have two ThinkPenguin laptops, one of which I’m using as a media center. I’m quite satisfied with both of them.

________________

*No, you can’t shade or “roll up” windows on Windows. I also don’t think you can do it on iJunk, but I have relatively little experience with crapple that product.

Share

Geeking Out (Updated) 0

Mageia v. 8 with the Plasma desktop environment. The wallpaper is from my collection.

Screenshot

I expect to upgrade to Mageia v. 9 tomorrow.

Addendum:

The upgrade was successful, but not without some speed bumps.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

The EFF weighs in on Facebook’s flagrant failure to forestall repulsive rhetoric. Here’s a bit:

This incident serves as part of the growing body of evidence that Facebook’s systems are inadequate in detecting seriously harmful content, particularly that which targets marginalized and vulnerable communities.

Follow the link for the full post and a link to their full submission to Meta’s Overlook Oversight Board.

And remember, “social” media isn’t.

Share

“Influencer” Idiocy 0

At Psychology Today, Tamara Sobel looks at mounting evidence that “social” media isn’t. Here’s a tiny excerpt; follow the link for the article:

Troubling research from this year (as well as what we glean from our children, students, patients, and selves) shows us that exposure to advertising by influencers on social media is directly related to lower satisfaction with ourselves.

Share

Devolution 0

Grandmother and granddaughter walk through an amazing landscape of greenery, deer, foxes, rabbits, all beneath a rainbow.  Granddaughter is buried in her phone.  Grandmother says,

Click to view the original image.

Share

Doomed To Scroll 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Phil Reed looks at the depressing effects of drowning oneself in an unending torrent of news, both from traditional and “social” media. A snippet (emphasis added):

The news fed to digital devices is more-or-less bleak in nature, and its nature is outside people’s control—earthquakes, fires, wars, economic collapse, the impending sale of favourite football players to other teams, warts, and diarrhoea, are beyond the control of the person reading the story. All of this will reduce the strength and breadth of their behavioural repertoire (their willingness to do something),(2) focus their attention on the external,(5) and develop a helpless attributional style.(6) The key difference from traditional bad news is that digital bad news, because of the algorithm relating it to a person’s search strategies, will reinforce more strongly the internal dimension of the helpless attributional style.

Follow the link for the full article, including some suggestions for escaping the maelstrom of maliciousness and maintain a sense of perspective.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much 0

The editorial board of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch asks an AI bot to incriminate itself, and it willingly complies.

Share

Selling Snake Oil on the Disinformation Superhighway 0

Rebecca Watson parses the piffle.

or you can read the transcript.

And, while touring the Disinformation Superhighway . . . .

Share

Twits on Twitter X Offenders 0

Elon Musk says,

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

Battle of the Tech Bros 0

Psychologist Mike Travers suggests that the pending (potential? possible? preposterous?) cage match between Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg “is a snapshot of our culture.”

Afterthought:

If he’s correct, we’re in far worst shape than I feared.

Share

Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Peter Kvam posits that “(d)ogs excel at many tasks where AI fails . . . .”

Follow the link for his reasoning.

Share

The Disinformation Superhighway 0

To the surprise of all concerned, someone on “social” media gets held accountable.

Who woulda thunk?

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.