From Pine View Farm

Masters of the Universe category archive

The (Job) Creationism Myth 0

Share

Facebook Frolics, Take the Money and Run Dept. 0

A drag on the market. Reducing the IPO hysteria is likely a good thing for investors, if not for banksters. Bloomberg (emphasis added):

The Bloomberg IPO Index (BIPO), which tracks U.S. equities in the first year after their IPOs, sank 15 percent last month, with Facebook posting the worst one-week performance among the 30 largest U.S. IPOs since 2011. The IPO index’s decline is in line with the drop in October 2008, the month after Lehman’s bankruptcy triggered the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression.

(snip)

“We’ve reached a breaking point where sentiment is so negative and scrutiny is so high that companies don’t want to go public and investors aren’t prepared to look at them,” said Sica, who oversees more than $1 billion as chief investment officer of the Morristown, New Jersey-based firm. “You’re talking about long-standing damage to the psyche of companies wanting to go public and investors.

Long-standing damage to the psyche my anatomy. Fancy way of saying, “OMG we might have to have a product worth investing in.”

Man looking at stock market news:  "So that's why Mark Zuckerberg wears a hoodie."

Share

The Entitlement Society 0

Robyn Blumner considers the entitlements of one well-known bonus baby. She gives an example of one of his favorite entitlements:

But there is no big government entitlement as magical or beloved by Romney and Bain than the get-out-of-debt-free card bestowed by federal bankruptcy court.

Dade Behring went bankrupt, leaving Main Street creditors empty-handed, but not before Romney’s firm took $242 million out of it. In fact, of Bain’s 10 top business investments that made up 70 percent of the $2.5 billion Bain made for investors, four eventually went bankrupt, according to the Wall Street Journal.

That’s called winning for losing, a game perfected by top 1 percenters.

Follow the link for the rest.

Share

Romney’s Bain, Impervious to Garlic 0

Share

Responsible Fiscals 0

Bloomberg describes the case of Sherry Hunt. Background:

By 2006, the bank was buying mortgages from outside lenders with doctored tax forms, phony appraisals and missing signatures, she says. It was Hunt’s job to identify these defects, and she did, in regular reports to her bosses.

Executives buried her findings, Hunt says, before, during and after the financial crisis, and even into 2012.

In March 2011, more than two years after Citigroup took $45 billion in bailouts from the U.S. government and billions more from the Federal Reserve — more in total than any other U.S. bank — Jeffery Polkinghorne, an O’Fallon executive in charge of loan quality, asked Hunt and a colleague to stay in a conference room after a meeting.

The encounter with Polkinghorne was brief and tense, Hunt says. The number of loans classified as defective would have to fall, he told them, or it would be “your asses on the line.”

Hunt says it was clear what Polkinghorne was asking — and she wanted no part of it.

She fought back. Follow the link to find out what happened.

And think about the integrity of the company that forced her to fight to be honest.

Share

Facebook Frolics, Take the Money and Run Dept. 0

At MarketWatch, Mark Hulbert crunches the numbers and predicts

Assuming that the total number of its shares stays constant, that works out to a price per share of just $23.26 (in five years–ed.) — in contrast to its recent closing price of $33.03.

Ouch.

Actually, however, the news is even worse: No one is going to invest in Facebook shares today if its price will be 30% lower in five years. So, in order to entice someone to invest in it today, Facebook needs to offer a handsome return. Assuming that its five-year return is equal to the stock market’s long-term average return of 11% annualized, Facebook shares currently would need to be trading at just $13.80.

Follow the link for the how-to of his reasoning.

Share

Facebook Frolics, Give Me Everybody’s Money Back Dept. 0

Curiouser and curioser:

Morgan Stanley, the lead investment bank in Facebook’s troubled initial public offering, will compensate retail investors who overpaid when they bought Facebook’s stock in Friday’s IPO, according to a source familiar with the matter.

The person said the firm is reviewing orders its retail clients placed for Facebook stock, and will make price adjustments if the clients paid too much. The person spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly.

The person did not say what amount constituted overpaying for Facebook’s stock.

Daring financial wizards willing to take risks in the market, indeed.

Share

Update from the Foreclosure-Based Economy 0

Giving rise to new specialties in real estate:

Share

The Fee Hand of the Market 0

The Invisible Hand

Click for a larger image.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Suiting up:

Investors in Facebook’s IPO are not taking the stock’s drubbing lying down and have launched lawsuits against the social network, its underwriters and NASDAQ, while regulators probe the way the debut was handled.

Share

“Book ’em, Jamie-O” 0

Wall Street banker interrupts talk against regulations to bet on the ponies

Via Bob Cesca’s Awesome Blog.

Share

Aptitude 0

Teenager:  No supervision, despite crashing the car; no curfew, despite staying out all night.  Father:  He's destined to be a Wall Street banker.

Share

Dustbiters 0

All gone.

Share

Update from the Foreclosure-Based Economy 0

Foreclosures poised for a comeback. Process servers worry less about employment security.

Foreclosure filings picked up in Hampton Roads in April as lenders repossessed and auctioned an increasing number of homes with delinquent loans, according to a report to be released today.

Lenders issued 809 foreclosure-related notices in the area last month, up 2.4 percent from the 790 issued in March but down 21 percent from the 1,023 reported in April 2011, according to RealtyTrac, a foreclosure-monitoring service based in Irvine, Calif.

Share

As the Twig Is Bent 0

Conversation in front of casinos:  "Is all this gambling good for kids."  "Yes, it trains them to work on Wall Street."

Share

So Much Money They Don’t Know What To Do . . . 0

. . . or, for that matter, how to do it.

The video captures a rather rambling discussions, but the numbers . . . .

The Volcker Rule, which they refer to without defining, simply returns the banking model to what it used to be: banks would not be able to gamble with customers’ deposits.

Share

Wall Streat Weak 0

At Bloomberg, Jonathan Weil considers J. P. Morgan Chase’s gambling losses and Jamie Dimon’s statements about them. A nugget:

But there is more to it than that. Either Dimon misled the public about the gravity of the festering trades during his company’s first-quarter earnings call last month. Or he didn’t know what was happening inside the bowels of his own company. History tells us the latter is the norm for Wall Street bosses, though it’s hard to say which is worse.

Don’t bother asking JPMorgan how it accumulated all these losses. That information is proprietary, as if the taxpayers who bailed out the bank in 2008 don’t have any business knowing. Here’s an idea for a new rule: If a too-big-to-fail bank can’t disclose what its trading desk is doing for fear of blowing itself up, then the bank shouldn’t be allowed to do it.

Share

Facebook Frolics, Sharing Is for Others Dept. 0

Loyal to his Mammon.

Eduardo Saverin, the billionaire co- founder of Facebook Inc. (FB), renounced his U.S. citizenship before an initial public offering that values the social network at as much as $96 billion, a move that may reduce his tax bill.

Facebook plans to raise as much as $11.8 billion through the IPO, the biggest in history for an Internet company. Saverin’s stake is about 4 percent, according to the website Who Owns Facebook. At the high end of the IPO valuation, that would be worth about $3.84 billion. His holdings aren’t listed in Facebook’s regulatory filings.

Share

Update from the Foreclosure-Based Economy 0

At MarketWatch, Richard Gibson reports on the double-standard that keeps the home foreclosure market healthy and creates jobs for process servers. A nugget:

When this (the value of a property drops precipitously–ed.) happens to commercial property owners, our law gives them an escape route. They can file a Chapter 11 reorganization. While Chapter 11 filings are expensive, risky and uncertain, Chapter 11 gives commercial property owners the power of “strip down:” They can reduce the principal of their mortgages to the current fair market value of the property.

The rest of the mortgage, the amount by which the mortgage exceeds the value of the property, can be “stripped down” under Bankruptcy Code Section 506, or converted into unsecured debt, which can be discharged. “Strip down” gives underwater commercial property owners a reasonable chance to reduce their debts, and to return to profitability.

(snip)

But homeowners cannot use strip down. Under bankruptcy law, the only mortgages that cannot be stripped down are those against the principal residences of individuals or families. Donald Trump can use strip down to reduce multimillion-dollar mortgages against his casinos. A middle-class family, however, can’t use strip-down to save their home from foreclosure.

Share

Broke Banks 0

Atrios explains how banking works.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.