From Pine View Farm

Political Economy category archive

Trickle-On Economics and the New Gilded Age 0

Robert Reich calls out the con. A snippet:

Trickle-down economics is a cruel joke. The so-called “free market” has been distorted by huge campaign contributions from the ultra-rich. Don’t lionize the ultra-rich as superior “self-made” human beings who deserve their billions. They were lucky and had connections.

In reality, there’s no justification for today’s extraordinary concentration of wealth at the very top. It’s distorting our politics, rigging our markets, and granting unprecedented power to a handful of people.

Follow the link for his reasoning.

Share

“To . . . Promote the General Welfare” 0

Forty years of Republicanomics have taken their toll.

Share

Trickle-On Economics 0

Man kicking on vending machine labeled

Click for the original image.

Share

Supply Change 0

Sam suggests that the Federal Reserve’s response to the current spike in inflation in the U. S. is based on economic theories that don’t apply in the current situation and may therefore make the situation worse.

Share

How Stuff Works, Deficit Deceptions Dept. 0

Thom talks with Dr. Stephanie Kelton about the many myths and falsehoods about how government finances work and how the pearl-clutching about government deficits is a misdirection play.

Share

The Travelers’ Dilemma 0

Crowd of Russians at Aeroflot Russian airlines counter.  Ticket agent says,

Click to view the original image.

Share

Descent into the Maelstrom 0

Thom and David Corn discuss the Republican Party’s decades long descent into extremism.

Share

“Quiet Quitting”: No There There 0

A couple of days ago, I mentioned that I think the “Great Resignation” is more myth than movement. Now comes Laura Yuen, who argues at the Minneapolis Star-Tribune that “Quiet Quitting” is much the same. Here’s a bit of what she says (emphasis added):

The problem with the concept of quiet quitting is that we’re all starting from different places. Burned-out perfectionists may choose to dial back their efforts from a 10 to a 7, and still manage to be the kind of high-performing colleagues or bosses who attract and inspire talent. The people who were never pulling their weight will adopt this term to slack off even more, making more messes for their teams, all under the guise of self-care.

The framing is also objectionable. Are setting professional boundaries and prioritizing your family, your relationships or your health really “quitting”? If you are performing all of your work duties, the very bullet points listed in your job description, how is that akin to not doing your job?

Read the rest. It is worth your while in these times when memes seem to obliterate evidence and tweets trump (you will pardon the expression) truth.

Share

Behind the Scenes with the Wizards of Wall Street 0

Title:  How the Stock Market Really Works.  Image:  Man at desk with Ouija Board.  Next to him, a man on the phone says,

Click to view the original image.

Share

The Indignity of Honest Work 0

Jim Hightower has a suggestion for executives who are concerned about the “great resignation” (which methinks is more myth than movement, but that’s just me). Here’s a bit of his article (emphasis added):

Given the historic continuum of executive-suite disdain for working stiffs, it’s no surprise that the top dogs are still blaming “sluggish” workers for today’s rampant job dissatisfaction. But it’s both hilarious and pathetic that high-dollar bosses are so inept at employee relations that they can’t keep the rank and file on the job, much less keep them quasi-happy. . . . .

Seriously? Memo to CEOs: Try decent pay and benefits, rational scheduling, meaningful goals, real teamwork and personal respect. In a word: Dignity.

Via the Progressive Populist.

Share

It’s a Global Economy, in Case You Haven’t Noticed 0

Republicans, abetted by a complicit news media that values furor over fact, want to blame President Biden for the current hike in prices in the United States. (Of course, Republicans want to blame everything on President Biden, because blame and fear are their only weapons.)

University of Nebraska Omaha Professor Christopher Decker points out that this recent inflation is a world-wide phenomenon influenced by events well beyond the control of any one person, regardless of what office he or she might hold. Here’s a bit of his article; I commend the rest of it to your attention.

Meanwhile, annual inflation in Germany and the U.K. — countries with comparable economies — ran nearly as high: 7.5% and 8.2%, respectively, for the 12 months ending in June 2022. In Spain, inflation has hit 10%.

It might seem like U.S. policies brought on this predicament, but economists like me doubt it because inflation is spiking everywhere, with few exceptions. Rates averaged 9.65% in the 38 largely wealthy countries that belong to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development through May 2022.

Share

The Great Fizzle 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Nuala Walsh explores the much over-hyped not-so-great resignation. She makes three main points:

  • Many reports of the “Great Resignation” have circulated, panicking employers and fueling employees.
  • This has not materialized at the scale expected, with momentum and motivation now slowing.
  • Employers can stop panicking, as most employees are unlikely to resign in mass volumes.

Follow the link for a detailed exporation of each one.

Share

The Blame Game 0

The writer of a letter to the editor of the Kansas City Star talks cents.

(Broken link fixed.)

Share

It’s Bubbleiicious 0

Thom runs the numbers and makes the case that we are in (another) housing bubble.

Aside:

It has long been my opinion that anyone who considers his primary residence an investment property lives in a house occupied by an idiot.

Share

To Do Done List 2

Thom discusses news that doesn’t seem to be in the news.

Share

It’s All Relative 0

You’ve heard of “relative ethics.”

Meet “relative economics.”

Frame One, titled

Click for the original image.

Share

How Stuff Works, Econ 101 Dept. 0

Graphic explaining that

Via Yellowdoggranny.

Share

How Stuff Works, Republicanomics Dept. 0

Monopoly board with the following added to it:  You're playing Monopoly.  One player is given all the property except Baltic Avenue.  They're also given 95% of the Bank.  You're expected to succeed with what's left.  Of course, you lose immediately.  Why?  It must be because you're lazy.

Via Yellowdoggranny.

Share

How Stuff Works, Economic Exploitation Dept. 0

Title:   Capitalism:  A Short Story.  Image One;  Rich child standing on poor child's bck to pick and apple.  Image Two:  Rich child sitting on a wall eating the apple as the poor child looks on.

Via Yellowdoggranny.

Share

It’s Bubblicious 0

Michael in Norfolk, who happens to be a real estate lawyer, sees signs of a nascent housing bubble.

I remember during the housing bubble of the early 2000’s reading a column in the Inky by a business columnist named, I think, Alan Heavens in which he posited that one of the first signs of a bubble was persons starting to ask, “Are we in a bubble?”

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.