From Pine View Farm

Political Economy category archive

Accessories after the Fact, Reprise 0

Susan Estrich exposes the con. A nugget (emphasis added):

Cutting funding to the bogeyman IRS is a key item on the crazy right-wing agenda. Forget about all the studies that say that fully funding the IRS is critical to cutting the deficit. This is not because more middle-class families will be audited; the purpose of the funds that were added to the IRS budget is to ensure that corporations and the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes.

But don’t tell that to Johnson, who wasted no time at all in getting on the hard-right bandwagon, wrongly trying to convince middle-class taxpayers that they are the ones who will be paying the bill if the IRS budget isn’t cut.

Share

Accessories after the Fact 0

Monopoly

Click for the original image.

Share

Who’s Responsible for “the Weekend”? 0

Organized labor, that’s who.

Via Robert Reich.

Share

The Artful Codger, Reprise 0

President Biden speaks to striking workeers,

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

Misdirection Play, SOL* Dept. 0

James Rosen reviews the myth behind the misdirection and what the misdirection is meant to misdirect us from. A few tiny excerpts (emphasis added):

The drive for education standards, whether imposed by states or the federal government, is founded on a cruel fiction: If kids from poor families just applied themselves more; if their underpaid teachers just worked harder; if the standards for measuring progress were clearer and tougher — the problems in the classroom would vanish.

(snip)

The notion that more rigorous standards, whether imposed by states or the federal government, can significantly improve public education prevents us from confronting a harsh truth: Teachers, tasked with one of the most demanding and crucial jobs, don’t get paid enough.

(snip)

My experience has shown me that one great teacher is more important than any academic standards that produce only rote and superficial learning.

__________________

In my home state, “SOL” is alleged to stand for “Standards of Learning.”

Share

The Confounded CEO 0

CEO, holding a martini and looking out over his factory, says,

Click for the original image.

Share

Marie Antoinette Redux 0

The Arizona Republic’s E. J. Montini paraphrases Arizona Representative Andy Biggs’s stance on the impending shutdown of the federal government:

Let them eat cake.

Share

The (Corporate) Welfare State 0

At AL.com, John Archibald runs the numbers and concludes that Alabama is happy to pay welfare to rich corporations, but not to poor individuals.

I suspect you can find similar numbers for other states.

Afterthought:

Archibald doesn’t address this in his column, but it occurs to me that persons who can’t afford, say, for example, day care for their children and therefore have trouble finding jobs likely also cannot afford campaign contributions.

Share

How Stuff Works, Trickle-On Economics Dept. 0

Homeless man sleeping on park bench covered by newspapers with headlines,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Enjoying Your Weekend? 0

Well, Robert Reich wants you to know why you have one to enjoy.

Share

Collateral Damage 0

Caption:  Economic Revolution--Federal Reserve Inflation Battle.  Image: Trio of soldiers in tricorn hats behing a cannon.  One of them says,

Click for the original image.

Share

All That Was Old Is New Again 0

Der Spiegel has a fascinating interview with MIT economics professor Daron Acemoglu on the effects of advances in technology on society, with a focus on AI. As he looks at the effects of technological changes in history, Acemoglu sees parallels. Here’s a tiny little bit from the article.

DER SPIEGEL: But it is true that humankind has indeed benefited a lot from new technologies.

Acemoglu: That is the reason we have to go so far back in history. The argument that you just gave is wrong. In the past, we’ve always had struggles over the uses of innovation and who benefits from them. Very often, control was in the hands of a narrow elite. Innovation often did not benefit the broad swaths of the population.

DER SPIEGEL: Has the standard of living not risen steadily?

Acemoglu: Today, we are so much more prosperous than the people in earlier ages, that’s true. But there is a tendency to think that the path between must have been a straightforward and inevitable process. We all tend to gloss over the difficulties on the way.

DER SPIEGEL: What do you mean exactly?

Acemoglu: Take medieval windmills, a very transformative technology. It changed the organization of textile manufacturing, but especially agriculture. But you didn’t see much improvement in the conditions of the peasants. The windmills were controlled by landowners and churches. This narrow elite collected the gains. They decided who could use the windmills. They killed off competition.

I commend the complete interview to your attention.

Aside:

You can see this playing out in the current AWG SAG-AFTRA stike.

Share

The Malicious Myth of the Self-Made Man 0

David and his guest discuss the fallaciousness of the fanciful fable and the perniciousness of its perpetuation.

Share

The Unforgiven 0

At the Portland Press-Herald, Victoria Hugo-Vidal unloads about the fuss over President Biden’s attempts to lift the yoke of student loans from the necks of college students.

I commend her article to your attention.

Aside:

When I went to college, tuition was still within the reach of middle class families. My parents could afford my tuition and I did not need student loans. But that was before Ronald Reagan became president.

Reagon’s toxic trickle-on economics has gutted the middle class, eroded working class incomes, and imposed a crushing burden of debt on college students.

Share

Credit Crunch 0

Thom explores why Republicans are willing to erode America’s credit rating.

Aside:

The Founders were leery of political parties–they used the term “faction”–because they feared the time would come when a faction would put itself above the nation.

Methinks said fears may not have been unfounded.

Share

The Disconnect 0

The Star-Ledger’s Tom Moran looks at a recent Monmouth poll showing that over half of the populace thinks that the economy is doing poorly, then he runs the numbers, which indicate quite the opposite. A snippet:

Here are some inconvenient facts for Biden’s critics:

Since he took office, the economy has added 13 million new jobs, the most ever created in a single term. The unemployment rate is 3.6 percent, the lowest it’s been since the 1960s. The rate among Hispanics hit a record low of 3.2 last year, and for Blacks, the all-time low came this spring, when the rate dipped to 4.7 percent.

The man deserves a thumbs-up. But the Monmouth poll shows that 48 percent disapprove of Biden’s performance on jobs, with 47 percent approving.

Follow the link for his thoughts on the disconnect.

Share

The Fee Hand of the Market 0

Business newscaster says,

Click to view the original image.

Share

Both Sides Don’t 0

F. T. Rea points out that one thing is not like the other thing. Here’s a tiny bit from his article:

When it comes to infrastructure, Democrats think worn out bridges should be repaired or replaced before they fall down. Democrats think low unemployment is a good thing, too, which is another reason to replace the bridge.

Republicans like their labor cheap and hungry. So high un. employment is usually preferable. That was bullshit campaign promises to create new jobs have more traction, too. For Republicans, tax breaks for billionaires are more important than infrastructure maintenance and improvements.

Share

Stray Question 0

Instead of bulldozing homeless encampments, why not do something to house the homeless?

On second thought, that might promote the general welfare.

Why, that must most certainly be unconstitutional.

Share

Extortion Contortions 0

At the Hartford Courant, Democratic Congressman John Larson argues forcefully that the debt ceiling as it currently exists is a failed policy. He states (emphasis added)

The debt ceiling as it stands is a failed policy, which gives our worst actors the tools to threaten defaulting on payments they themselves voted for in order to extract concessions.

Follow the link for his reasoning.

Share