From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

“But It’s the Only Possible Explanation” 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Jeffrey S. Debies Carl takes a two-part dive into why persons spread conspiracy theories. One of his most disturbing findings at persons may benefit from doing so, but the evidence that they do benefit from fomenting falsehoods is all around us in dis coarse discourse. I commend both articles to your attention.

Here are his summaries of the main points from both parts (emphasis added):

Part One, titled Why Do People Spread Conspiracy Theories?

  • Many people assume people who spread conspiracy theories will be subject to ridicule.
  • Research suggests that conspiracy theories might actually improve the reputations of people who spread them.
  • Spreading conspiracy claims and thinking positively of those who spread them might be part of human evolution.

Part Two, titled Does It Pay to Spread Conspiracy Theories?

  • A new study examines the reputational consequences of spreading conspiracy theories.
  • The findings show that conspiracy claims can either improve the reputation of spreaders or harm them.
  • Social conflict improves positive reputational outcomes of conspiracy spreading and minimizes negative ones.

Share

Derange Brew 0

Title:  Sorcerers Apprentice.  Image:  Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg before a witch's cauldron graced by a map of the globe.  Next to them sits a broom that looks like Donald Trump.  A cabinet behind them holds containers of

Click to view the original image.

One more time, “social” media isn’t.

Share

The Privatization Scam 0

Via Cliff’s Edge, Matt Robison and Anne Kim parse the preverication.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Florida Men.

Share

A Pillow of the Community 0

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Rebecca Watson comments on Mark Zuckerberg’s decision the greenlight hate speech on his “social” media platforms. (Warning: Mild language.)

Or you can read the transcript.

Share

Republican Thought Police in This New Gilded Age 0

Title:  It's 2025.  Time To Be Oligarchically Correct.  Frame One, captioned

Click for the original image.

Share

Missing in Inaction 0

The Editorial Board of my local rag looks at statements by a number of Republican regarding the fires in California and editorializes that

Withholding relief from California fire victims would be unconscionable

The editorial itself is behind the paywall, but its title summarizes it nicely.

But that leads to a larger question:

    Where is the evidence that today’s Republican Party has a conscience?
Share

Facebook Frolics 0

At AL.com, Kyle Whitmire finds himself less than impressed with Mark Zuckerberg’s reasons for abandoning fact-checking Fakebook Facebook; Whitmire notes the irony (emphasis added):

Seemingly overnight, Facebook — which insists on being called Meta now — swapped out its political identity more swiftly than its name. The world’s largest social media company announced it would suspend fact-checking, which CEO Mark Zuckerberg called “biased” and prone to mistakes. Zuck did not cite examples, nor weigh any errors against the good that fact-checking may have done. Instead, he cited his opinion as a fact. And who will be left at the company to fact-check him?

And that’s just the start. Follow the link for the rest.

Meanwhile, in more news of the Zuckerborg . . . .

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

Via the Majority Report, a business professor argues that “income inequality is out of control,” then Sam and the crew discuss his remarks.

Afterthought:

We are reaping the harvest of Reagan’s trickle-on economics.

Share

Job Interviews 0

PoliticalProf.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

The Rule of Flaw 0

A Solomonic ruling rooted in Cannon law.

Share

Driving Defensively on the Disinformation Superhighway 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Bill Eddy notes that (emphasis added):

  • Social media and some news outlets often include false information which can feel true from repetition.
  • Research shows that false and emotional information spreads farther and faster than the truth.

He then suggests ten questions that can be helpful in parsing perfidy. Here’s a snippet; follow the link for the full list.

Will the speaker/writer personally benefit by saying what they are saying . . . .

Share

Arson Investigators 0

Man One:  Elon Musk says Los Angeles is on fire because of D. E. I.  MAGA-hatted man:  They have a woman fire chief.  Can you believe it?  Man One:  President Trump says it's because Gavin Newsom refused to sign the very real Water Restoration Declaration.  MAGA-hatted man:  Lying Democrats claim no such document exists.  Man one:  Their shamelessness knows no bounds.  MAGA-hatted man:  Alex Jones says the fires are a globalist conspiracy to wage economic warfare before triggering total collapse--and Elon agrees.  Man one:  Thank goodness for X, the everything app, where we can do our own research.  Man three:  I wonder if droughts and rising temperatures resulting from climate change could have probably played any role in these fires?  (Pause)  I'm kidding.  Do I look like a conspiracy nut?  MAGA-hatted man:  Hah!  You had me worried for a moment there.  Man one:  I bet it was space lasers.

Click to view the original image.

Share

The Kleptocrats 0

Vladimir Putin looks at a map of Ukraine and says,

Click for the original image.

Share

Prioritization Nation 0

At the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Mike McCool share a few thoughts about our nation’s priorities.

Share

“History Does Not Repeat Itself, but It Often Rhymes”* 0

At the Idaho State Journal, Kim Shinkoskey hears a rhyme. Here’s how he opens his article:

The MAGA movement in America is currently using methods perfected by the Soviet communist movement in Russia.

Follow the link for his evidence.

________________

*Mark Twain.

Share