From Pine View Farm

Political Theatre category archive

The Choice 0

PoliticalProf lays it out.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

A Notion of Immigrants, Reprise 0

Mary Trump lists the lies told by the lying liars in the Trump maladministration to justify his persecution of immigrants.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Goat:  Is there any rule you live by?  Rat:  Just . . . if you don't have anything nice to say . . . .  Goat:  . . . don't say anything at all?  Rat:  No, go Twitter and say it there.  Goat:  It's not even called Twitter anymore.  Rat:  Is it called the mean nasty place?

Click to view the original image.

One more time, “social” media isn’t.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

At the Tampa Bay Times, John Hill writes that he is somewhat less than enamored by efforts in the Florida legislature to gut restrictions on the use of child labor.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Stephen offers a paean to billionaires.

Share

DOGE Bull 0

Frame One:  Man points towards foot and says,

Click for the original image.

As one who has lived through hurricanes (after Donna, we were without power for eight days and my father had to sink a well so that we had water), I do not think that gutting the NOAA is a good idea.

Afterthought:

I do not think it is beyond the realm of plausibility to suggest that one of our major political parties no longer believes in promoting the general welfare.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Warning: Mild language.

Share

The Golden Trumpled Door, Reprise 0

At The Sacramento Bee, Erwin Chemerinsky calls out Donald Trump and the Republican thought police. Here’s how his article starts (emphasis added); follow the link for the rest.

The Trump administration has revoked hundreds of visas solely due to a disagreement with personal views held by these individuals. This blatantly violates the First Amendment: the government is never allowed to act against people in the United States because of the ideas they express.

In fact, Immigration and Customs Enforcement posted on social media that its goal was to stop illegal ideas from coming into the country (this post was later taken down). But under the First Amendment, there is no such thing as an illegal idea.

Share

All the News that Fits 0

Dan Perry argues that confusion is the game plan. A snippet; follow the link for his reasoning.

If the goal is to maintain the pretense of democracy — or at least the holding of elections, which is only one part of a democracy — you have to persuade enough people that the media is bad. To discredit the very service that they used to depend on for information.

This is why Trump won’t shut up about “the fake news” and declares the media the “enemy of the people,” a phrase borrowed from Stalinist Russia. That’s why his stooges actually speak of “alternative facts.” That’s why characters like Elon Musk will try to present the news media as “elites” pursuing some dark agenda to silence the valiant voices of the ordinary citizen (on social media, of course).

Share

The Golden Trumpled Door 0

Visitors to the U. S. are entering customs.  Giant ICE agent says to one,

Via Job’s Anger.

Afterthought:

The American dream, however imperfect it may have been in its reality, is being throttled before our eyes.

Share

“History Does Not Repeat Itself, but It Often Rhymes”* 0

At the Washington Monthly, David Masciotra hears a rhyme.

__________________

*Mark Twain.

Share

The Enemy Within 0

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette’s Gene Collier note that

If any foreign country, any rival government, even any loosely aligned shadow terrorist movement, had done to America what the second Trump administration has wrought within the space of 84 days, we’d be at war.

Follow the link to see why he wrote that.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Warning: Short promo at about the one minute mark.

Share

The Rule of Lawless 0

It appears that Donald Trump believes that “freedom of the press” should be subordinate to “fee-fees of the president.”

Share

Defensive Driving on the Disinformation Superhighway 0

Sam Goldstein, writing at Psychology Today Blogs, offers some tips.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

Gut Reactions 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Kenneth Barish argues that “(w)e are motivated in our political opinions first by feelings and secondarily by ideas.” I don’t know that I fully agree with him, but, given the increasingly toxic nature of dis coarse discourse, I think his article is well worth a read. Here’s a tiny bit from it:

A Supreme Court justice is not conservative because he is an “originalist” or a “strict constructionist.” He is an originalist because he is conservative. Antonin Scalia disputed this, even called it a slander, but his argument is unconvincing. Liberal justices are not liberal because they believe in a “living constitution.” They believe in a living constitution because they are liberal. For Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the starting point and core premise of her judicial philosophy was the awareness of injustice. For Scalia, the starting point was what he perceived as moral decadence in society and the need to defend traditional values. This is why Scalia and Ginsburg, friends for decades, continued to disagree.

Share

This New Gilded Age 0

Frame One:  A group of plutocrats approach Lady Liberty and say,

Click for the original image.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.