The Secesh category archive

God forbid that they should relinquish their emblem of treason heritage.

Attorneys for a Southern heritage group are urging members to resist a recall of now-banned Virginia license plates with an image of the Confederate battle flag.

More rising again at the link.

Unreconstructed frolics.

Monumental doings down the road a piece.

What puzzled me most about this story in my local rag is why, in the print edition (yes, we subscribe to the print edition; we believe in supporting our local rag–it’s not perfect, but, all-in-all, it’s a pretty good rag), the Sons of Confederate Veterans was referred to as a “Vets’ Group” on the overrun page.

“Vets” of what? Of the war to preserve chattel slavery, to keep persons in bondage, to steal the labor of others because of the color of their skin?

Dollars to doughnuts not a one of them lifted a weapon in that war.

Or is “Vet” newspeak for “Secesh”?

Words fail me.

Watch what they do, not what they say.

Wayne Curtis ruminates on the statue of General Robert E. Lee that graces downtown New Orleans and the discussion over whether it should be removed to a different location. A snippet:

Not surprisingly, there has been considerable resistance. As of this week, nearly 20,000 people had signed a petition at change.org calling on the mayor to “cease and desist any and all talks that involve the demolition and re-naming of the Robert E. Lee historical monument.”

Others have invoked the slippery slope argument—if you rename this monument, where do you stop? New Orleans may not be a celebration of the confederacy, but it’s marbled with it, like gristle. There’s the Beauregard monument at the entrance to City Park, not far from the Jefferson Davis Parkway. There’s Palmer Park, named after minister Benjamin Morgan Palmer, who gained some fame for declaring it the duty of the south “to conserve and to perpetuate the institution of domestic slavery as now existing.” And there’s Calhoun St., named after John C. Calhoun, who once said that “we have never dreamed of incorporating into our union any but the Caucasian race. … Ours, sir, is the government of the white race.” How far down are the shadows cast? Should the highly regarded Isidore Newman School be renamed because its namesake once donated to a fund for the Beauregard statue, implicitly hailing the man who defended slavery?

Those who revere symbols must know that, in their reverance, they also revere what the symbols symbolize (for Pete’s sake, that’s why they are called symbols. They symbolize).

Indeed, the very energy with which they attempt to deny that (“The war, suh, was about economics, not slavery”) attests that, on some level, they do in fact recognize it and the hypocrisy that attends their reverence.

Warning: Language.

A California Democratic State Senator has a proposal. Here’s a bit from his article in the Sacramento Bee:

Our public buildings should be named for people of great accomplishments who are role models of good behavior, morals and principles. Unfortunately, some public places in California still honor Confederate leaders who split the country in two to preserve slavery.

I don’t want to erase their names from our history books; I just don’t want our children looking up to people who fought for a system that treated humans as chattel.

This is the basis for my legislation, Senate Bill 539, the Frederick Douglass Liberty Act, which seeks to remove names of elected and military leaders of the Confederachttp://www.sacbee.com/opinion/op-ed/soapbox/article27733588.htmly from public places, including parks, buildings, roadways and schools.

I fear it is too much to hope that the big lie of Gone with the Wind and the “Land of Gracious Living” has run its course. I expect that the New Secesh will double-down on their culture of insurrection, on holding on to what they gained after losing the war, but winning the peace.

Nevertheless, it’s good to see public persons scrounge up the courage to call out the lie.

As business meetings officially began at the Sons of Confederate Veterans national reunion in Richmond, one of the group’s stars warned that a backlash is brewing against a “mania of anti-Southernism” sweeping the country.

Yeah. They decry “anti-Southernism” while relentlessly turning their faces from the meaning of “Southernism.”

And, in the same item, an ex-actor suffers a sense of residual loss.

Ben Jones, a former U.S. House member known for playing Cooter on the TV show “The Dukes of Hazzard,” said Thursday that there’s been a “visceral reaction to this wave of cultural cleansing.” Those who see the Confederate flag as indisputably racist, Jones said, went “a bridge too far” by pulling “Dukes of Hazzard” reruns off the air.

More self-righteous Pharisaical hypocritical bigotry at the link.

Really, now, North Carolina Republicans, is “outside agitators” the best you can do?

Furrfu.

. . . then wonders why persons got provoked.

The stupid. It burns.