Last Updated on May 27 2017, 12:51 pm EDT
Weather by NOAA
Current Conditions: Mostly Cloudy
Wind: NE at 9mph
Heat Index: 83°F
Your 5-Day Forecast at a Glance
Second Thursday of the Month
Drinking Liberally Website
Join us at Meetup.
Follow the conversation at Facebook.
Updated March 11, 2017
Video via io9. Story via Wait! Wait!
March 23, 2013 at 8:08 pm
There’s something wrong, er — fishy, about the feature photo. It’s the only one like it on the web and I recall seeing it over a year ago. The rest of the photos of the monster goldfish are much smaller, match the size described in news stories — about 14 inches, 4 and some pounds. Plus there are multiple photos of different people holding different samples at different times, not one guy with a fish that looks like it could topple him over backward. This UC Davis biology flyer lists the big invasive fish, max size 16 inches.
March 23, 2013 at 8:21 pm
I sourced it as well as I could in 15 seconds, but it’s local TV news, Nothing would surprise me. It could be the freshwater of equivalent of alligators in the sewers, I guess.
I’ve been fooled before. That’s what divorce lawy–never mind.
I would find even a 16 inch long goldfish to be rather startling.
Afterthought: On another look, the one in the feature photo does look rather more like a blow-up doll than a real goldfish, at least any real goldfish I ever saw. (A blow-up goldfish doll–shudder).
March 23, 2013 at 9:35 pm
The story is real. 16-inch goldfish -are- startling. The LA Times had a picture of one of the scientists holding a recently caught 14-incher and that was big. It’s the on-the-fly news stations and websites that have put that other one in with the collection.
March 24, 2013 at 8:39 am
I know the story is real. But I share your skepticism about that yard-long goldfish!