2007 archive
Conservapedia 0
I have neither the time nor the inclination nor the ability to improve upon Phillybit’s deconstruction of that farce.
In the Meantime . . . 4
. . . let us keep our eyes on the bouncing ball. Dan Froomkin (emphasis added):
Gonzales’s inattentive management of the Justice Department and the repeated deception of Congress by senior Justice officials are certainly important issues.
But the central question before us is whether the unprecedented mid-term purge of eight U.S. attorneys was the result of their having failed to use their offices to pillory Democrats as much as the White House wanted them to.
Negligence and deceit are one thing; a policy of requiring law-enforcement officials to abuse the justice system for partisan ends is quite another.
It’s sounding awfully like “high crimes and misdemeanors” to me.
But why should this time be any different from all the other times?
Footnote:
This has nothing to do with “Conservative” or “Liberal.” This has to do with “truth” or “falsehood.”
Quiz 5
What is wrong with this picture?
How Martha Mitchell Started Alberto Gonzales’s Downfall. 0
Jon Swift dissects the evidence:
Now Gonzalez has been forced to admit that “mistakes were made” although he didn’t know anything about them. He pointed out that there are 110,000 people working in the Justice Department and he can’t possibly know what they are all up to. Unlike bloggers, Attorneys General and Time correspondents have real jobs and they can’t be expected to know everything.
Attorney-Gate 0
The five stages of spin:
1. Ignoring
2. Belittling
3. Blaming the Media
4. Evoking Bill Clinton.
5. BoredomThat last stage allows the sufferer to return to stage 1 and ignore the issue. Also note that righties don’t necessarily go through these stages in order or even one stage at a time.
Via Digby.
Brendan Sees the Implications . . . 0
. . . of measuring US Attorneys on political loyalty:
It gives Vince “Other People’s Money” Fumo’s “it’s just politics” defense strategy legs.
Nothing Ever Really Goes Away on Computers 0
But there is a lot that can rise up and bite someone later:
That same day information was sought on Google and MSN search engines on such topics as “instant poisons,” “undetectable poisons,” “chloral hydrate,” and gun laws in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
Ten days later, according to allegations by the state of New Jersey, Melanie McGuire murdered her husband at their Woodbridge apartment — using a gun purchased in Pennsylvania.
And you can bet that somewhere, there’re servers whose access logs show her IP address and those search terms.
Dick Polman on Scandal-Mongering 0
The Bushies have cornered the market.
Follow the link for the full post. It’s a hoot. But I just had to quote this part, because it fingers something that was bothering me all day (emphasis added):
The Passive Voice defense. He (Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez–ed.) confessed that “mistakes were made here,†the usual form of words that is meant to suggest that maybe the mistakes sort of happened by themselves, that no actual human being had specifically made them. Republicans might be well advised to remember that this was the same form of words used by Ted Kennedy right after Chappaquiddick.
Vigilantes Lose Vigilance 2
Couldn’t have happened to a nicer group of guys:
Former leaders of the Minuteman Project accuse founder Jim Gilchrist, 58, of using $300,000 of the group’s money to support his pet causes, including promoting a book he co-wrote and funding an unsuccessful run for Congress in a 2005 special election. Last month, saying they are the group’s board of directors, they took over the Minuteman Project Web site and bank accounts, and fired Gilchrist as president.
How Radical Am I? 3
Blogthings thinks it knows:
You Are 24% Politically Radical |
![]() You’ve got a few unusual political ideas, but overall you’re a pretty mainstream person. Chances are that you’re turned off by both the radical right and looney left. |
Oh.
Yeah.
Tag!
With a tip to Phillybits.
General Pace’s Views on Homosexuality 0
I will not comment on whether I agree or disagree with what he said, at least not in this post.
I will say that I think “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” is stupid seriously flawed.
In a statement Tuesday, he said he should have focused more in the interview on the Defense Department policy about gays _ and “less on my personal moral views.”
I do think those who demand that he apologize for his remark are missing the point. He was asked a question and he answered honestly. He should not have to apologize for being honest.
It’s one thing to say, “I disagree with you, and here’s why.”
It’s quite another to say, “I disagree with you, and demand that you apologize for your beliefs,” especially as regards what is one of the hot-button moral discussions of our time, one on which people of good will sincerely disagree (we will ignore the people of ill will).
Let us look in the bright side.
Someone appointed to his job by the Current Federal Administrator told the truth.
That is cause for celebration.
Support Our Troops 0
Because the Current Federal Administration does not:
The hypocrisy of the Current Federal Administration makes me gag.
Industrial Relocation 0
More to the point, does the United States have an extradition treaty with Dubai? Inquiring minds want to know.
Going to the Dogs 3
It didn’t matter that Lucy is a 10-month-old English bulldog, because he and Lucy are “best buddies.”
And Phillybits found this:
The cat, a black and white domestic male, went on the rampage Wednesday when a neighbor showed up at the door with a different cat, mistakenly thinking it belonged to the woman.
Foxy! 1
We had a little discussion about Fox News the other day.
This casts some light on how Fox operates–the evidence is in the crawl. Note that the poster used to work for Fox.