From Pine View Farm

July, 2009 archive

They Don’t Report So You Can’t Decide 0

Emails reveal right-wing media efforts to protect Gov. Mark “the Hiker” Sanford:

It’s not surprising that the emails underline the utter confusion that beset the governor’s hapless aides as they tried to ward off inquiries about their boss’s whereabouts, without themselves having any idea where he was.

But they also show something even funnier: an effort by the right-wing media to curry favor with Sanford’s office by dismissing the story as a storm in a teacup created by the liberal media. It’s fair to say that, as news judgments go, it would be hard to find one that turned out worse than this — given the subsequent revelations about Sanford’s Argentinian liaison and his abandonment of his post.

Right-wing conspiracy? What right-wing conspiracy?

Share

Stray Questions 6

Why are the persons who write WordPress plugins so lax about uploading screenshots of what they look like on the front page of your blog?

I really don’t care what it looks like on the backend.

Share

The Internet Is a Public Place 0

We leave tracks.

Here’s where I’ve been, courtesy of web2.0collage dot com (pretty boring, ain’t it).

Web Collage

Dorkazine explains.

Share

In His Steps 0

Emphasis added:

Conman Bernard Madoff was transferred to the U.S. Penitentiary in Atlanta, where he will begin serving his 150-year sentence, the Bureau of Prisons said on its Web site.

(snip)

Charles Ponzi was also incarcerated at the Atlanta facility, CNN reported. Madoff asked at his June 29 sentencing for masterminding the largest Ponzi scheme in U.S. history to be sent to a medium-security prison in Otisville, New York.

Share

A Day Decade Late and a Dollar Short 0

Potentially big news in the “what you don’t know won’t hurt us” circles of high finance:

The U.S. Justice Department is investigating the market for credit-default swaps, according to Markit Group Ltd., the data provider majority-owned by Wall Street’s largest banks.

(snip)

The antitrust division sent civil investigative notices this month to banks that own London-based Markit to determine if they have unfair access to price information, according to three people familiar with the matter. U.S. lawmakers plan to regulate the $592 trillion over-the-counter derivatives market, which includes credit-default swaps blamed for helping worsen the biggest financial calamity since the Great Depression.

Share

We Need Single Payer 0

A caller to the Diane Rehm show:

Given a choice between a disinterested bureaucrat and an insurance company employee with a fiduciary interest in denying me coverage, I’ll take the bureaucrat.

Share

Republicans Got Nothing 0

Just racism and bigotry. And making the rich richer and the poor poorer.

Really, it’s just not a very nice party.

Via Balloon Juice.

Share

Greater Wingnuttery XXXIV 0

Why does the Republican Party think that the answer to every question is “War”?

Share

Drinking Liberally 0

Tuesday, Triumph Brewing Company, 2nd and Chestnut, Philadelphia, Pa., 6 p. Good food, good drink, good fellowship.

You’re probably safe to attend tomorrow. I have a summer cold that will likely keep me off the road.

Share

Quote of the Day 0

From a comment up the road a piece and to the left.

It amazes me how so many people in this country confuse “freedom of speech” with “freedom from consequences.”

Share

Spectral Beings 0

Brendan goes ghostbusting:

    In light of the latest unemployment figures, there are more persistent questions coming at the administration. Did Obama and his team get it right last winter when they put together their $787 billion stimulus package, or did they undershoot? If they made a mistake, what should they do now?

The guys at the Post must be too busy selling access to lobbyiststo do their homework, because that statement is not even close to accurate. As the AP reported in February, it was the Senate that insisted on a $787 billion stimulus. Obama asked for more than a BILLIONS more. And guess who was the driving force behind the cuts?

    Scaling back the bill to levels lower than either the $838 billion Senate measure or the original $820 billion House-passed measure caused grumbles among liberal Democrats, who described the cutbacks as a concession to the moderates, particularly Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., who are under pressure from conservative Republicans to hold down spending.

Actually, Arlen is really neither a Republican nor a Democrat.

He’s an Arlenicanocrat.

Share

Faith Is the Evidence of Things Unseen (Updated) 0

Not the disproof of things seen.

Karen Armstrong writes at the Guardian:

The extraordinary and eccentric emphasis on “belief” in Christianity today is an accident of history that has distorted our understanding of religious truth. We call religious people “believers”, as though acceptance of a set of doctrines was their principal activity, and before undertaking the religious life many feel obliged to satisfy themselves about the metaphysical claims of the church, which cannot be proven rationally since they lie beyond the reach of empirical sense data.

Most other traditions prize practice above creedal orthodoxy: Buddhists, Hindus, Confucians, Jews and Muslims would say religion is something you do, and that you cannot understand the truths of faith unless you are committed to a transformative way of life that takes you beyond the prism of selfishness. All good religious teaching – including such Christian doctrines as the Trinity or the Incarnation – is basically a summons to action. Yet instead of being taught to act creatively upon them, many modern Christians feel it is more important to “believe” them. Why?

Follow the link to read how she answers the question.

We see the disconnect between professed belief and action in the evil and sordid deeds of those who loudly and publicly congratulate themselves on how “Christian” they are; they thereby discredit, not only their own creed, but all creeds.

Comes now the best argument that atheists can muster on the side of disbelief: the actions of “believers.”

Addendum, Later that Same Day:

Speaking of those who pray loudly in the public square, as the hypocrites do . . . . (Via the Booman.)

Share

History Lesson 0

The Booman summed it up so I don’t have to:

. . . It’s pretty plain that something pathological has dwelt within the Right for a very long time. The difficulty in diagnosing it has been that almost none of us were alive and conscious in the 1920’s, the last time before the Bush Era that the GOP controlled all three branches of government.

The 1930’s brought a deep and abiding minority status for the Republican Party, all of which they spent nursing one form of paranoid grievance or another. In the 1930’s it was red-baiting, foaming about the New Deal, and apologizing for fascism. In the 1940’s, after the war, it was an unhealthy obsession with the Red Menace of Russia and China. In the 1950’s it was all about communist infiltration of the government, Hollywood, and the armed services. From the 1960’s on, it has been about countering the counterculture and fighting the expansion of rights to all our citizens, regardless of race, gender, religion, or sexual preference. Their one decent president in all this time wasn’t even much of a Republican. The Democrats would have happily nominated the Supreme Allied Commander in 1952 if Ike had only agreed to run on their ticket. The rest of the GOP’s lineup has been thoroughly corrupt, if not corrupt and incompetent.

Really, not much has changed. The right is still the right that Richard Hofstadter diagnosed over half a century ago.

They are afraid.

They are afraid of history.

Share

Charade 0

Share

Gun Nuttery 1

An armed society is a polite society. Not.

Share

We Need Single Payer 0

What Susie said.

The point of health care should be caring for health, not lining the pockets of CEOs.

Share

The Fee Hand of the Market 0

Anonymous Liberal on health care:

The bottom line is that, when it comes to health care, all the market is really capable of doing is providing reasonably affordable care to the young and healthy, people for whom the risk profile is essentially random and therefore the economic model more closely resembles that of other major types of insurance (car, home, life). But a system that only covers the young and the healthy is, by definition, a failure. That’s why every other industrialized country has long since adopted some sort of government insurance system. Expecting the market to provide affordable health care to all is like expecting the market to provide everyone with an affordable personal chef. It’s never gonna happen.

Ruin your Sunday. Read the whole thing.

Share

Tull 0

Share

Executive Immunity, Bushie Style 0

John Cole on Cheney and the violation of civil liberties:

I was listening to NPR yesterday, and one analyst stated that the reason Washington is terrified to investigate this is because they know that so many laws were broken so flagrantly that any investigation will lead to the indictment of Bush and Cheney, and that, for obvious reasons, terrifies the Democrats (you can listen to that piece here). It would simply consume Washington and destroy Obama’s agenda, and they want to avoid that at all cost. Holder, on the other hand, may not give two hoots about Obama’s agenda and the delicate sensibilities of the Democrats, and go after them anyway.

(Follow the link to see the links that Mr. Cole refers to above.)

Looking to the future is one thing. Turning a blind eye to evil is quite another.

Evil was done.

In our names.

Read more »

Share

Congressional Democrats 0

Ballsy

Via BartBlog.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.