According to Andy Borowitz:
In a performance guaranteed to raise some eyebrows in Delaware and beyond, Tea Party candidate Christine O’Donnell said at a senatorial debate last night that she strongly supports “the separation of speech and thought.”
The alarming thing is that O’Donnell’s reading of the Constitution is typical of that of the teabaggers. They are the Humpty-Dumpties of historical interpretation–they make it mean what they want it to mean, one thing today, another tomorrow.
She is just the most incoherent at expressing it.