From Pine View Farm

January, 2011 archive

Facebook Frolics 0

El Reg takes a look at Facebook’s current security practices.

It’s conclusion: Somewhere between non-existent and lousy:

“I definitely feel that Facebook could be doing more to both better secure their users, and to ensure that privacy is treated as a higher priority,” Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos, told El Reg.

Facebook may talk a good game but a quick search (viewable only if logged into Facebook and safe providing you don’t click on the links) shows hundreds of victims have installed a rogue app that falsely promises the ability to “see who has viewed your profile”.

Facebook ought to have someone searching for such scams and stamping them out, something that isn’t happening as yet. “Often I see these scams spreading for days on end, with no obvious action taken by Facebook,” Cluley said.

Share

No Strings Attached 0

Bennett

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Florida Republicans want to encourage politeness by further allowing folks to pack heat on campus and forbidding adoption agencies and doctors, including psychiatrists, from asking clients about gun ownership.

Daniel Ruth comments in the St. Petersburg Times; follow the link for the full article:

But perhaps the most delusional bill is sponsored by Sen. Greg Evers, R-You Talking To Me?, which would make it illegal and punishable with a $5 million fine for any doctor to ask a patient about guns, or to include firearm ownership information in a medical record.

If you think Evers’ First Amendment assault on the doctor-patient privilege has about as much chance at passage as Jared Loughner merely getting probation for his alleged role in the Arizona shootings, well, don’t be so hasty.

(snip)

By the standards imposed by Evers, R-Lock & Load, a psychiatrist treating a patient for depression would be barred from determining if the patient owns a weapon, or even making a note about it. A doctor prescribing medication that may induce mental side effects could be precluded from asking if the patient owns a weapon — and, again, prevented from adding a notation to the patient file.

The blatant political pandering aside, this is not about hunting, nor target shooting, or nor even self-defense.

Nor is it in any way about a “well-regulated militia” (or a “well-regulated” anything).

Guns are to gunnuttery as shoes are to foot fetishism–objects of compulsive, unrestrained, unreasoned desire.

Share

Differential Calculation 0

Non Sequitur

Share

QOTD 0

John Maynard Keynes:

Americans are apt to be unduly interested in discovering what average opinion believes average opinion to be.

Share

No Depths Too Deep 0

Less than two weeks on the job, Colorado Secretary of State Scott Gessler says the $68,500 a year salary doesn’t pay enough.

That’s why Gessler, a Republican, says he is going to be moonlighting as a lawyer for his old law firm – a firm known for representing clients on elections and campaign law issues, the very areas Gessler is now charged with policing as secretary of state.

So, why did he run for the damned job?

He’s a member of the same party that thinks public employee salaries and pensions are too high and must be destroyed.

Words fail me.

Via Balloon Juice.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 3

(Link Expired)

Bennett

Via Tampabay dot com.

Share

If a Tree Falls in the Forest and No Villagers Are Around To Hear . . . 0

Will Bunch agrees with David Sirota in suggesting that it is because Spokane is in flyover country.

Share

“Let’s Go Out with a Bang” 0


Morbid Curiosity Leading Many Voters To Support Palin

Via Andrew Sullivan.

Share

Dustbiters 0

My friend had cataract surgery yesterday (when seems to have gone very well) so I missed the FDIC’s weekly celebration of responsible fiscals and universe masters.

Don’t look for these responsible fiscals. They ain’t mastering universes no more:

Share

IOKIYAR 0

Where was he when George W. Bush and Walmart were closing the deal?

U.S. Rep. Randy Forbes strongly criticized President Barack Obama’s lavish White House state dinner for Chinese President Hu Jintao, saying Friday that American leaders were wrong to honor China’s success rather than challenge its growing influence.

Share

Driving While Brown 0

Share

QOTD 0

Henry David Thoreau:

Every generation laughs at the old fashions, but follows religiously the new.

Share

And Now for Something Completely Different 0

Share

Bait and Stitch 0

From the if-it-ain’t-broke-don’t-fix-it files:

A Carrollton woman has filed a medical malpractice lawsuit that claims she was given the wrong-sized breast implants.

Gwen Haden says a surgeon at a Nevada VA hospital shorted her by 50 cubic centimeters. She is asking for $150,000 in damages.

In November 2009, Haden underwent elective breast augmentation surgery at Mike O’Callaghan Federal Hospital, near Las Vegas. She says in the suit she paid $1,850 for the surgery plus $800 for 300cc implants.

Share

ConsTEAtutional Amendments 0

Leonard Boasberg, writing at the Philadelphia Inquirer, wonders why, if teabaggers so revere the Constitution, they are so eager to amend it. A nugget:

The new Republican majority in the House of Representatives played to its tea-party base by opening the proceedings with a reading of the Constitution – well, most of it anyway, skipping some embarrassing parts, like that business about “three-fifths of all other persons.” But now let us turn our attention to how the tea-party folks would amend the document they regard with such reverence.

The so-called “repeal amendment,” if approved – which, fortunately, seems unlikely – would allow the repeal of any act of Congress or federal regulation by the legislatures of two-thirds of the states. Legislators in 12 states have come out in favor of this nutty idea, as have Virginia’s attorney general, Kenneth Cuccinelli, and the new majority leader in the House, Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia.

(snip)

Instead of reading the Constitution aloud, the Republican members of Congress might do better to read the Federalist Papers, written by Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay to explain and defend the Constitution to the then-disunited states. In Federalist No. 34, Hamilton countered those who objected to the idea that the laws of the United States would be the supreme law of the land.

“But what inference can be drawn from this, or what would they amount to, if they were not to be supreme?” he asked, and answered: “It is evident they would amount to nothing.”

Like phony preachers who wave the Bible while stuffing their pockets from the offertory, they like only the parts they like and so there!

Share

Terrorism in Idaho 0

The story of the very real bomb that was in Spokane is getting far less play than the story of the underwear bomb that fizzled. One wonders why.

Meanwhile, the Rude One is so outraged at the attempted bombing of a Martin Luther King Day parade that he cannot even bring himself to be profane, at least not to his usual standards of profanity which often keep me from quoting him directly.

Excerpt below the fold.

Read more »

Share

Back Alleys 0

Glomarization points out why the back alleys are coming back.

Share

When Chickens Come Home To Roost 0

A live hen was thrown through the open window of a Kentucky Fried Chicken (KFC) restaurant in Warwickshire (UK–ed.).

RSPCA inspectors say they want to speak to the two men who approached the restaurant in Bermuda Park, Nuneaton, on a moped on Tuesday evening.

The RSPCA wants to talk to the two men about their abandonment of the chicken. The chicken is up for adoption.

Share

QOTD 0

Ed Markey:

The war against terrorism is a war against those who engage in torture.

Afterthought:

Sometimes it is unclear who exactly is on the other side:

Share