From Pine View Farm

January, 2011 archive

Oops 0

Er,

yeah.

This is just a quick musing, but it’s worth noting the extent to which political violence is virtually nonexistent in the contemporary United States. The attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan in 1981 was the last incident of major political violence. Since then, the odds of violence or injury for a major elected official have dropped dramatically.

I say it’s worth noting because political violence was once a regular feature of American life; in the 20th century, four presidents survived assassination attempts, while two — William McKinley and John Kennedy — were victims. In the 19th century, violence claimed two presidents: Abraham Lincoln and James Garfield, while Andrew Jackson survived an assassination attempt. Attempts have been made on the lives of presidential candidates, some successful — like the assassination of Robert Kennedy — and others, like the attempt on George Wallace, less so. Dozens of elected officials have been violently attacked over the course of American history, and dozens more have been killed (including 24 officials in the Reconstruction South). And of course, this is to say nothing about periods of widespread mob violence, and violence against prominent social leaders, like Malcolm X and Martin Luther King, Jr.

It’s impossible to say whether we’ll see a renewed spike in political violence, but it suffices to say that this current period is remarkably calm, and something of an achievement.

Another nice catch by Feastingonroadkill.

Share

QOTD 0

Eric Hoffer:

Take away hatred from some people, and you have men without faith.

Share

Beached Whale 0

I know from my days in the security industry, because I knew persons who worked for manufacturers, that Walmart would volunteer to teach manufacturers how to move their factories to China.

Bruce Sterling:

The US is broke. So they can’t buy anything from people; they’re not selling anything that people want, except for guns and iPhones. There’s just not a lot of reasons for foreigners to exercise any hostility against the US, or even care what the beached whale is doing one way or the other.

American soft power is vanishing. Foreigners are much less interested in American television, movies, pop music… America once had a tremendous hammerlock on those expensive channels of distribution, but those old analog megaphones don’t matter half as much in today’s network society.

The USA has become a big banana republic; in other words, it’s come to behave like other countries quite normally behave. The upside is that we don’t get blamed for what happens; the downside is, nothing much happens. Decay and denial. Gothic

But, as a consolation, Goldman’s sacks are full.

Via Feastingonroadkill.

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

This tale of suspense, betrayal, and the Golden Turnip is weirdly fascinating in a train wreck kind of way.

Background:

BIG TWEET’s power on Twitter has become a threat to celebrities, advertising agencies, network television & Twitter’s main competitor FACEBOOK. Online followers are the new currency. And BIG TWEET has them all. A billion. Whatever he says is heard. By millions. And his unmatched Internet influence has now made him (and his main girl) the number one target of the corporate underworld and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg. BIG TWEET and his girl are about to be DELETED! Ordered by an underground secret corporate society, a group of Mexican gangsters have been hired to kidnap BIG TWEET and his girl. Their mission is simple. They must delete them both.

(Warning: Some language that you are likely to hear at your local school bus stop and on the Daily Show.)

Share

Clowns to the Left, Jokers to the Right (Updated) 0

I received an email today from one of my leftie mailing lists with the subject line

Tell Sarah Palin: Violent threats have consequences.

You may recall that many found Sarah Palin’s gun sight graphic deplorable when it was first published.

It was indeed crude, rude, stupid, combative, tasteless, and silly all wrapped up in one cute little ball of yarn-spinning (much like Palin herself).

But it was not a threat.

Calling it one detracts from the larger problem and requires ridicule, for it clouds the issue, which is this:

    Adherents of the right wing quickly and casually label those with whom they disagree as traitorous, treasonous, and unAmerican (as well as perverted, godless, and whatever else pops up in their Roget’s–no insult is beyond their pale).

Rightwingers cannot brook disagreement. Anyone who disagrees with them becomes not just an opponent, but also their and the country’s enemy. Once someone is so labeled, he or she becomes fair game for whatever loony-toon decides that the violent rhetoric of the right is not rhetoric, but a call to action.

You seldom hear violent rhetoric from the mainstream left (such as it is). As Bob Cesca pointed out this morning:

And, by the way, screw anyone who says there’s similar language on the left. If there is, who’s saying it? Blog commenters? So what. Liberals leaders aren’t. It’d run entirely contrary to the nature of liberalism for a left-wing authority figure who enjoys similar status to Sarah Palin to suggest that we ought to use “Second Amendment remedies” as a means of pushing our agenda. I can’t possibly imagine Cory Booker or Howard Dean using such metaphors. And even if one slipped out, I don’t know any militaristic, gun-toting… anti-war pacifists. Maybe they’re out there somewhere hanging with leprechauns and hobbits. Nevertheless, it goes without saying that liberals aren’t violent (there are exceptions to everything, but not enough exceptions to make “left-wing extremism” as serious threat).

Furthermore, the rightwing’s tactics of hate militate against reason and compromise.

After all, one cannot reason with a traitor, can one? If one’s political opponent is ipso facto a traitor, simply because he or she opposes you, conciliation becomes impossible.

So, why do they do it?

The facts lean left.

Fear and hate obscure facts. Fear and hate is what they got.

Addendum:

I did not expect to have an update for this post, but I really must direct you to Field’s remarks.

Share

Untold Stories 0

Offered without comment:

A drunken driver with a woman on his lap crashed head-on into a game warden at Hungry Mother State Park on New Year’s Eve, according to police.

(snip)

“Only they know what they were doing; we can’t speculate on that,” said Virginia State Police Sgt. Steve E. Lowe. “As to what they were engaged in, you can draw your own conclusions. She was on his lap – we’re going to leave it at that.”

(Some) Details at the link.

Share

2nd Amendment Remedies (Updated) (Updated Again and Kicked to the Top) 1

(First published January 8.)

From AZCentral dot com:

Rep. Gabrielle Giffords is out of surgery and one of her surgeons said “I’m very optimistic about her recovery.”

“She was shot one time in the head through and through,” Dr. Peter Rhee said at an afternoon news conference at University Medical Center in Tucson.

The bullet entered one side of her head and exited the other after passing through her brain, Rhee said.

Giffords, 40, a third-term Democrat, was shot at an event in Tucson Saturday morning, at a Safeway at Ina and Oracle roads. Authorities identified the gunman as Jared Loughner and said the 22-year-old suspect is in custody. (Initial news accounts and reports from authorities misidentified the name as Laughner.)

Six people, including a girl who was about 9 years old, were killed and 18 were injured in the shooting at a Safeway in northwest Tucson at Ina and Oracle roads. Sources told The Republic that federal Judge John Roll was among the six killed.

President Obama speaks on the shooting:

TPM has the latest on the suspect. He appears to be a rightwing loonie of the type which calls itself “sovereign citizens.” (TPM is likely the best site for keeping up with this story as it breaks.)

No doubt this was completely unrelated to the drumbeat of anti-government and anti-Obama sentiment in Wingnut World.

This SPLC video, prepared for police to use for training during shift roll-calls, describes the particular form of sovereign citizen lunacy. The video is not for the squeamish.

Read more about sovereign citizens here.

Addendum:

The county sheriff speaks:

“When you look at unbalanced people, how they respond to the vitriol that comes out of certain mouths about tearing down the government. The anger, the hatred, the bigotry that goes on in this country is getting to be outrageous,” he said. “And unfortunately, Arizona, I think, has become the capital. We have become the mecca for prejudice and bigotry.”

In the meantime, those who speak the rhetoric of violence are busily washing their hands, saying, “Oh, no. It wasn’t us.”

I need a drink.

Addendum-dee-dum-dum, Two Days Later:

Another indication of the shooter’s having been attracted to the “sovereign citizen” ideology (idiotology?) is his fascination with language, as outlined in the Guardian this Monday:

Some reports have connected this with the arguments of David Wynn Miller – or as he styles himself, Judge David-Wynn: Miller – whose near-impenetrable, capital letter-heavy website expounds the notion that grammar is used to control the populace, and that by inserting colons or hyphens into your name you can escape taxable status by becoming a “prepositional phrase”.

While a small number of defendants have previously sought, without success, to use Wynn Miller’s methods to defend themselves against tax avoidance charges, he has until now remained largely unknown outside of far-right US circles. His name was connected to the Loughner inquiry when an official from the Southern Poverty Law Centre, which monitors extremist groups, told US television that it seemed Loughner had been “getting some of his key ideas from David Wynn Miller”.

Share

Goldman’s Sacks 0

Writing at Bloomberg, David Pauley dissects Goldman Sachs’s behind-the-scenes trading of Facebook in the “shadow stock marked.” He is skeptical of their valuation:

If you believe the company (Facebook-ed.) is worth $50 billion, take another leap. Using Facebook’s numbers from last week — the best we have in the absence of complete financial reporting — we might guess it made about $500 million for the year. That would mean its shadow market value was about 100 times its earnings. Google’s price-earnings ratio is 25.

Investors with short memories will pay whatever the shadow market and Goldman Sachs, the prospective underwriter, say they should.

Back in 2000, Cisco Systems Inc., then already the dominant company in computer network gear, had a P/E approaching 200. It’s now 15.

There’s another even more down-to-earth problem for the company. Facebook is now seen by analysts as a threat to Google as a gatherer of ad revenue. Who’s to say a few years from now another startup won’t pose a similar threat to Facebook?

Based on Goldman’s past, it could easily be that they are betting against the investors in the shadows. They have done it before.

The “shadow” part of the “stock market” should provoke extreme caution.

Remember, in three-card monte, the marks always lose.

Share

Can’t Win for Losin’ 0

Wasserman:

Wasserman

Share

QOTD 0

Jim Morrison:

Violence isn’t always evil. What’s evil is the infatuation with violence.

Additional reading here.

Share

The Morning Show 0

Effectively captured by Comically Vintage.

Share

The President’s Weekly Address 0

From the transcript:

This incentive is part of the economic package I signed into law last month – a package that also includes a payroll tax cut that will mean $1,000 more this year for a typical family. In fact, 155 million workers will see larger paychecks this month as a result of this tax cut.

Twelve million families will benefit from a $1,000 child tax credit and an expanded Earned Income Tax Credit. Eight million students and families will continue to benefit from a $2,500 tuition tax credit to make college more affordable.

And millions of entrepreneurs in big cities and small towns across the country will benefit not only from the business expensing plan I mentioned, but from additional tax cuts that will spur research and development.

Share

2nd Amendment Remedies, Reprise (Updated) (Updated Again) 0

Delaware Liberal has a timeline of domestic political violence, both committed and exhorted, from 2008 to the present.

The drip-drip-drip has not been so noticeable, but the total accumulation is quite appalling sizeable.

Addendum:


TPM’s Josh Marshall
on Countdown with sane and sensible comments:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Addendum-dee-dum-dum:

Michael Tomasky talks sense on the relationship between rhetoric and violence at the Guardian. A nugget:

In sum, he (the shooter–ed.) had political ideas, which not everyone does. Many of them (not all, but most) were right wing. He went to considerable expense and trouble to shoot a high-profile Democrat, at point-blank range right through the brain. What else does one need to know? For anyone to attempt to insist that the violent rhetoric so regularly heard in this country had no likely effect on this young man is to enshroud oneself in dishonesty and denial.

If buffoons run about for months and months spouting nonsense about “second amendment remedies” and “by force if necessary,” they lose the moral right to be shocked, shocked! shocked! if some fugitive from a looney-bin takes them up on it.

“But I never expected this to happen despite calling for it for the last two years” really doesn’t make it to the rational excuse list.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Polite maybe. Stupid, yes.

Quibble: I don’t think “supervised” is a good word in the first line. How in the world can a 15-year-old be expected to “supervise” a grown-up, even when the younger is plainly the more grown-up of the two?

A teenager who supervised an 8-year-old who shot himself with an Uzi submachine gun at a 2008 gun fair testified yesterday that he told the boy’s father that “it wasn’t a good idea’’ to let the child fire it.

(snip)

Spano said he offered the micro Uzi because Dr. Charles Bizilj wanted his two sons to shoot an automatic weapon and a regular Uzi the father had picked out was failing to fire in automatic mode.

“I told him it wasn’t a good idea because it shoots fast and kicks hard,’’ said Spano, who was 15 when the shooting occurred.

The story goes on to report that one juror has been dismissed because she could not contain her tears.

Share

QOTD 0

Will Rogers:

About all I can say for the United States Senate is that it opens with a prayer and closes with an investigation.

Share

Clownstitutionality 0

(I know that this has been amply echoed in the echo chamber, but I really just cannot resist.)

The hollowness of the Republican declaration of loyalty of the Constitution of the United States of America is exceeded only by their ignorance of its provisions.

In a follow-up to the embarrassing non-swearing-in of Reps. Pete Sessions, R-Texas, and Mike Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., on Wednesday, the House this morning approved a resolution nullifying their votes on six roll call votes, cast when, it turns out, they were still “representative-elect.

Sessions and Fitzpatrick sent letters to every member late Friday apologizing for the episode, saying they were deeply committed to “maintaining the integrity of the People’s House.”

In the immortal words of Bugs Bunny, “What a maroon. What an ignoranamus.”

Afterthought:

Hanlon’s comments seem appropriate. A nugget:

Do conservatives have a Constitution fetish? Yes, they do. In that they worship the image of the Constitution as a religious idol, not that they actually follow it any more strongly than progressives.

Share

Knee-Jerks 0

Lucovich

Dick Polman, writing elsewhere, provides context. A nugget:

The (health care–ed.) repeal vote is sheer simplicity. It’s political theater for the tea-party crowd, a gimmick by which the Republicans hope to bank some good will in the short run, knowing full well that the base will be disappointed down the road. Already, we’re getting word that a key GOP campaign promise – to cut $100 billion from this year’s budget – is as DOA as health reform repeal. The rumored reduction tab is now down to around $30 billion or less. For instance, Republican leaders were thinking about slashing federal road money – whereupon their good friends at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce told them, oh no, you can’t do that.

Share

Chucking Finn 0

Clarence Page discusses the recent silly attempt to bowdlerize Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn.

Twain was a man of his time who rose above his Southern heritage to reject the bigotry and prejudice of his upbringing. And even though the Civil War ended outright slavery when Twain was a young man, explicit and outspoken bigotry, prejudice, and racial oppression were accepted in the public discourse long after Twain’s death.

Page comments:

As a black kid who read “Huck” in a mostly white classroom with a white teacher, I know the unsettling startling pain of seeing the N-word used so casually in print. But I also am eternally grateful to our teacher for helping us to talk about it. She helped us to appreciate the book’s genius of language, vision and, most memorable, its quietly subversive satirical cleverness. It skewers the immorality of white supremacy that it so vividly portrays.

Young Huck’s moral compass is warped by his drunken, brutal father and the culture in which Huck was raised, as his casual use of the N-word illustrates. Escaping his father, he unexpectedly teams up with the slave Jim. He feels guilty at first about helping his neighbor’s “property” escape. Yet as he gets to know Jim and his desire to rescue his wife and children, the slave becomes a better father figure than the one Huck left behind. To me, the book is that rare classic that I not only praise but still enjoy reading.

Huckleberry Finn, despite the burlesque humor, is a novel of transcendence, of Huck’s realizing that the beliefs he was brought up with were evil.

The discomfort that Huck Finn causes today says more about the persistance of those same beliefs in our society than it does about Twain’s honest confronting of them, counched as it was in the common speech of his time, in the pages of a book.

Share

Seeing Red. Not. 0

Computers are stupid.

They just do what they are told, but they do it really really fast.

If they are operated by incompetents, they automate incompetence.

Case in point (emphasis added):

Stupid is as stupid does. Q. E. D.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Six girls have been arrested after students were invited on Facebook to take part in “Attack a Teacher Day” at two middle schools.

According to the story, they were arrested the same day as the Nebraska school shooting.

It’s not a Facebook issue, really.

It’s that the internet is a public place, and these folks don’t know how to behave in public.

When I was a teenager, “Don’t get caught” was one of my primary guidelines.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.