From Pine View Farm

2015 archive

A Bit More Hope 0

SS United States
See the full-sized image

. . . an anonymous donor just buoyed it (the S. S. United States–ed.) with $250,000.

“We’re singing from the rooftops – or whatever a maritime version of that would be,” Susan Gibbs, executive director of the SS United States Conservancy, said yesterday.

The massive ship (it’s as long as the Comcast Center is tall) remains docked at Pier 82 on the Delaware River. The owners constantly stave off the threat of the ship being scrapped. The monthly maintenance costs stand around $80,000.

Gibbs believes that donations like this could spur more of the same.

Share

QOTD 0

Redd Foxx:

Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing.

Share

Juxtaposition 0

Sign:  Toys 'R Us, Hooters

Via Sampler, an image site (some images NSFW).

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Demonstrate your politeness to your neighbors.

On Saturday, February 7, 2015, at about 5:30pm, the Sparta Police Department responded to an apartment on the 700 block of Birdie Court as a resident reported coming home and discovering a bullet hole in the ceiling and damage to personal property inside the apartment. . . . .

Officers spoke to 25-year-old Mark Hayes, of Sparta, who stated he was handling a pistol when he accidentally discharged the firearm. Luckily, the victim was not home at the time the shooting occurred and no one was injured.

This story is notable in that the gun was not reported to have fired itself.

Share

The Galt and the Lamers 0

In the Bangor Daily News, Bloomberg’s Noah Smith exposes Rand Pauls ignorance of accounting. He cites three points on which Paul gets stuff exactly backwards. Follow the link for his explanation of each point.

Paul’s first error was in his understanding of leverage.

(snip)

His second error was his definition of bankruptcy.

(snip)

The senator’s third error came from his calculation of the size of the Fed’s liabilities.

Share

The Snaring Economy 0

Robert Reich asks,

How would you like to live in an economy where robots do everything that can be predictably programmed in advance, and almost all profits go to the robots’ owners?

Meanwhile, human beings do the work that’s unpredictable — odd jobs, on-call projects, fetching and fixing, driving and delivering, tiny tasks needed at any and all hours — and patch together barely enough to live on.

Follow the link for his answer.

Share

The Actualization of Potentialities Manifests Itself in Imperative Fashion 0

In my local rag, Bernadette Kinlaw takes on corporate doublespeak. A snippet:

CNN provided us with a wonderful yet horrifying example of gobbledygook.

Management had plans “to leverage internal efficiencies by enlisting external resources, thus driving a reduction in operating costs, thereby enhancing shareholder value.”

How would you interpret that?

We’re laying off people to save money and please our stockholders.

I worked in corporate America for a long time and I learned that long words and convoluted language meant one or both of two things: emptiness and treachery.

Do read the rest.

Afterthought:

You can rephrase the title of this post loosely as “git ‘r done.”

Share

The Pusher Men 0

Via Raw Story.

Share

The Climates They Are a-Changing . . . 0

. . . but you didn’t hear about it on your telly vision . . . .

Share

The Doctor Is (Almost) In 0

This should be fun:

Retired surgeon Ben Carson on Sunday said he could form a committee to explore a bid for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination this month and make a formal announcement in May.

So he is maybe possibly thinking about throwing his hat in the ring.

On the bright side, he would be a better candidate than Donald Trump. So far as I know, he hasn’t gone bankrupt four times, at least not monetarily. “Intellectually” is another matter.

Share

QOTD 0

Natalie Jeremijenko:

The idea that there is a rational truth out there that is not embodied in a person’s politics is something I can’t understand or subscribe to.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

I’ve seen a number of articles and blog posts claiming that Brian Williams’s fantasies of being embattled in Iraq don’t matter because, as the reasoning usually seems to go, “Who cares?” I disagree.

I gave up on television news three decades ago, when broadcast news morphed from being a “service” to being a “profit center.” I long before had realized I could read four times as much information in half an hour as I could passively have poured into me from television (and without the commercials). Nevertheless, Williams’s perfidy, intentional or not, matters greatly.

At Psychology Today Blogs, Denise Cummins discusses this; here’s a bit:

The media is the “fourth estate.” It has tremendous power to influence policy and hence history. And for that reason, news anchors can’t just be pretty faces, charismatic celebrities, or entertainers. They have to be people of integrity who are held to high standards. We need to know that what we are being told is the truth. And that means that news anchors must remain dispassionate, disinterested, and truthful reporters.

We already have one major “news” network dedicated to spreading propaganda and falsehood to poison public discourse. We need trustworthy–not error-free, which is an impossible goal, but given in good faith–reportage so as to make informed decisions.

Otherwise, the country will go to hell even faster than it already is.

Share

GOP Health Care: Don’t Get Sick. If You Do Get Sick, Die Quickly 0

Share

“Facts Are What People Think” 0

Leonard Pitts, Jr., explores the mania for “secret knowledge”:

No, the Secret Knowledge is the truth behind the truth, the real facts behind the facts “they” want you to believe. It unveils the conspiracies beneath the facade suckers mistake for real life. Not incidentally, the Secret Knowledge will always confirm your worst fears.

(snip)

Bad enough the Secret Knowledge drives our politics (Barack Obama is a Muslim from Kenya), our perception of controversy (Trayvon Martin was a 32-year-old tough with tattoos on his neck), our understanding of environmental crisis (there is no scientific consensus on global warming) and our comprehension of tragedy (9/11 was an inside job). Apparently, it now drives healthcare, too.

Read the rest.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Exercise courtesy on the roadways.

A driver was stopped behind a BMW at a red light on Rainier Avenue South and South McClellan Street just before 11 a.m. Friday, police reports say. When the light turned green, the BMW did not move, so the driver behind the car honked the horn. Instead of resuming driving, the BMW driver leaned out the car window and pointed a handgun at the honker.

Bimmer Boy is in custody.

Share

“Don’t Go There” 0

Share

Diligence 0

Not even bothering to go through the motions.

Share

If Congress Worked Like NASCAR 0

Congressman with label on back of his coat telling who gives him how much campaign money.  Caption:  Washington introduces new truth-in-labeling law.

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

QOTD 0

Anne Rice:

We’re frightened of what makes us different.

Share

Anti-Vax Facts 0

The Deseret News skewers the notion of “religious objections” to vaccinations.

And while the question of personal objections to vaccinations remains a hot topic, one aspect seems to be indisputable: No major religion explicitly objects to immunization. The Deseret News identified one faith, with approximately 12,000 members, that has a tenet explicitly rejecting injections or vaccines of any kind.

But the world’s major faiths — Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Judaism and Islam — have no explicit prohibitions against oral or injected vaccines. At times, some followers or preachers within a given religion or sect may have spoken against vaccination, but researcher John D. Grabenstein of Merck Vaccines, writing in the scientific journal Vaccine in April 2013, could find no sustained teaching against the practice in any major faith community.

According to the story, even Mary Baker Eddy said that vaccinations were okay.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.