From Pine View Farm

All the News that Fits 0

In the Raleigh News and Observer, Edwin M. Yoder, Jr., considers the wasteland that constitutes contemporary news coverage in the United States. An excerpt:

At an end of term party (after leaving journalism, he taught at Washington and Lee–ed.) one of my bright students asked: “Are you aware, sir, that when you mentioned television news you invariably called it ‘the so-called news’?” I was unaware but not surprised. Even with ornaments like Cronkite, Brinkley and Sevareid, all originally schooled in print, the 15- to 30-minute programs offered only superficial glimpses of a complex world. “So-called news” indeed.

In those latter days of print supremacy, few foresaw the chaos generated today by “social media,” which is so often anti-social in effect. Add a twittering president who regards newspapers as “enemies of the people” and applies epithets worthy of a banana-republic caudillo to his critics : “the failing New York Times” and “the lying Washington Post.” Donald Trump is so prolific a source of fables and fantasies that the Post counts them in the hundreds. You needn’t be deeply schooled in psychology to identify his epithets as the projections of his own ingrained hostility to truth.

In a related article, Bella DePaulo attempts a taxonomy of Trumpian lies. A snippet:

As I read through Trump’s lies in the process of categorizing them, I realized I could not limit myself just to the categories of self-serving and kind lies. I had to add the category of cruel lies — lies that hurt other people or disparage or embarrass or belittle them. In the research my colleagues and I did, we found that only 1 or 2 percent of all lies were cruel. That’s why I wasn’t going to bother with them when coding Trump’s lies. . . .

Now let me tell you what I found when I tallied Trump’s cruel lies. Instead of adding up to 1 or 2 percent, as in my previous research, they accounted for 50 percent.

Share

Comments are closed.