From Pine View Farm

The Unbalanced Balance 0

David Atkins considers the difficulty media faces in presenting a “balanced” range of opinion in editorial commentary and analysis, or, to put it another way, how persons like David Brooks and Bret Stephens, who are always wrong, manage to hold down jobs.

He suggests that those who employ them a face a dilemma: whether to portray the American right-wing as it is or as they would prefer it to be. Here’s a bit:

So let’s say you’re the editor of a major magazine or newspaper, and you want to give voice to the somewhat less than half or so of the country that identifies broadly with conservative perspectives. Do you hire an alt-right figure with openly racist and sexist attitudes, who actually represents what conservatism is today, even though it will outrage your readers and provide a dangerous platform for hateful views? Do you hire partisan operatives who will parrot the talking points du jour and defend whatever outlandish pronouncements Trump makes next, at the risk of ruining your brand in much the same way CNN has done by inviting commentary from the likes of Jeffrey Lord and Kayleigh McEnany? Or do you hire a never-Trump conservative like Bret Stephens who doesn’t actually represent very many people, but who won’t unduly offend readers’ sensibilities or implicitly encourage violence against women and minorities?

He goes on to point out that a similar situation exists as regards liberal commentators, but that it is no nearly so severe.

Share

Comments are closed.