September, 2022 archive
Precedented 0
Michael in Norfolk sees a similarity.
Follow the link for the rest.
Nor Any Drop To Drink . . . . 0
Noz thinks we need to follow the money.
Facebook Frolics 0
It continually amazes me that folks will fall for stuff they read on a computer screen just because they read it on a computer screen.
Unfortunately, this same gullibility extends to what persons “share” as “news” on “social” media, dodgy websites, and Fox News.
Echoes of Sexism 0
I was listening to a mystery novel and the reader read
I must confess, I was mildly surprised that the stenographer was a he, because, when I was a young ‘un, stenographers were assumed to be shes.
We may not be able to shed the prejudices with which we grew up, but we can certainly make ourselves aware of them and thereby liberate ourselves from their blinders.
Originalist Sin 1
Mark W. Schwiebert points out that the concept of Constitutional Originalism is, in fact, contrary to the thoughts of those who originated the Constitution.
Here’s a bit from his article (emphasis added); follow the link for the rest.
Aside:
To be blunt, the motivating factor behind “Constitutional Originalism” it to restore the 3/5s clause, if not de jure, at least de facto. All the rest is smoke screen.









