From Pine View Farm

Culture Warriors category archive

Suffer the Children 0

It’s not scripture. It’s policy.

Share

Real Big Men 0

Alfred Doblin muses on the state of “manhood” (whatever that is) and concludes that it has been Trumpled.

A snippet:

Too many men believe the art of the deal is more important than the actual deal itself. Getting away with it is not an accomplishment worthy of praise. It is not manly in the least.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Hijab hijinks.

Share

Hazardous Duty 0

Woman to man:  In my previous job, I always carried mace and a stun gun.  Man:  Were you in law enforcement?  Woman:  No, I worked for Fox.class=”aligncenter” width=”500px” height=”373px”

Share

“Think of the Bakeries” 0

Redacted Tonight discusses how the religious right is attempting to leverage the recent hurricanes so it can suckle at the public teat.

Warning: Language.

Share

Whinestein 0

Also at the Inky, Will Bunch excoriates Harvey Weinstein’s farcical attempt to attribute his predations on the 1960s. A snippet:

In Hollywood, the phrase “the casting couch” — the sexual scam that Weinstein updated — originated in the 1910s, making that sick tradition essentially as old as the movie studios themselves. And if “Weinsteinism” is some kind of warped offshoot of 20th century liberalism, how to explain the abuses by conservative heroes such as O’Reilly or his boss, the late Roger Ailes?

The biggest difference in sexual abuse — by family members, “trusted” adults, bosses, or the otherwise powerful — before the arrival of the 1960s and ’70s was that victims were more likely to suffer in silence, increasing their trauma. As for those changing “rules” that Weinstein clings to as his excuse, the only real rule changes that mattered that came from the early 1970s were the ideas that women had a right to more freedom, more respect and greater opportunity in the workplace and in every other social arena that mattered.

Share

Blaming the Victim 0

John Kim, writing at Psychology Today Blogs, demonstrates that women are not to blame for male predation. Furthermore, he suggests Harvey Weinstein and his ilk are far from being monstrous exceptions to the rule, but, rather, are far too typical.

Here’s a snippet:

The exposure of Weinstein, Cosby, Trump and others in the last few years. They represent the very tip of a very deep iceberg. Their behavior exists in offices, car dealerships, schools, churches, yoga studios, fitness gyms, photo shoots, casting rooms, pretty much anywhere there are women.

Aside:

It’s not the best-written piece, but I think he makes points worth considering. And, in a related piece, Laura Gianino tells a tale of trolls.

Share

Trumpling Weinstein 0

At the Boston Review, Bonnie Honig sees both similarities and differences between Donald Trump and Harvey Weinstein. The similarities she perceives are not surprising, but the differences are chilling.

Here’s a bit:

Trump and Weinstein differ in one crucial way, however. Weinstein is old-school. He feared exposure. And his responses now show it.

(snip)

. . . Trump has changed the rules of the game. Trump would never offer to get treatment to save his job. He would never ask for a second chance. If you are emailing your friends asking for support, if you say you will seek treatment, if you are hoping for another chance, you are already—in Trump’s grade school terms—a loser: reality’s victim, not its maker. The game is over.

Follow the link for the rest; it is quite worth your consideration.

Share

Value Vultures 0

Jim Wright exposes the con.

Read it.

Share

One Thing Is Not Like the Other Thing 0

Randye Hoder points out similarities between the conduct towards women of Donald Trump and Harvey Weinstein because of Weinstein’s contributions to Democratic candidates and causes.

She then notes a crucial difference:

. . . there’s only one difference that matters: We didn’t make Harvey Weinstein president.

Click the link to follow her path the this conclusion.

Share

Return of a Classic 0

In The Roanoke Times, Steve Frey despairs at the revival of a TV classic. A snippet:

The problem is, this version of Eddie Haskell is 70 years old and the most important person in the world. He has the power of life and death over millions of people not just in America, but around the world. However, he’s still making fun of people, acting pretentious when it suits him, and is often caught in “untruths.”

In this modern scenario, Chief of Staff Kelly acts as Ward Cleaver, giving Donald fatherly advice, which the president seemingly ignores. Can’t you just see General Kelly standing by the fireplace advising, “Now Donald, you know that tweet was mean-spirited and will just get you into more trouble.” Wally and Beaver would listen and learn; Eddie Haskell Trump just keeps doing it. He can’t help himself. He seems to need A LOT of attention.

Aside:

For all who yearn for that portrayal of 1950s America, remember, Barbara Billingsley was a working mother.

Share

School for Scamdal 0

Pap and Frank Schaeffer discuss the home school scam and its origins as a proxy for re-segregating schools.

Share

The Entitlement Society 0

Share

A Picture Is Worth 0

Piggishness knows no party.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Jay Bookman discusses Donald Trump’s debasement of political debate. A nugget:

We can begin our foray with the following tweet from the president of the United States, ostensibly the most important person on the planet, yet a man who parades his deep and crippling insecurities as if they were missiles in a North Korean military parade:

    Nobody could have done what I’ve done for #PuertoRico with so little appreciation. So much work! pic.twitter.com/k2jAkIpfjI

    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 8, 2017

In ordinary times, such a childish whine for attention would be considered extraordinary evidence of a leader’s incapacity and weakness, and cause for global concern. It is literally inconceivable coming from any other major political figure, perhaps in history, and in fact is inconceivable from anyone else beyond the age of 10.

In the era of Trump, it’s just a Sunday.

Share

“Republican Family Values” . . . . 0

. . . is a con for the rubes.

Share

“Republican Family Values” 0

Juanita Jean.

Share

Into the Darkness 0

Subject:  Roy Moore's Alabama primary victory.  Image:  Highway with sign saying,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Schism 0

Using the contrast between reactions to a kneeling Colin Kaepernick and a kneeling Tim Tebow as a starting point, Michael Frost explores what he suggests is an increasing division with Christianity.

Of course, there has never been a monolithic Christianity, not even during Medieval times. Early on the Roman Catholic and the Orthodox Churches split, largely over political and cultural issues; for a short time, there were even two Popes, one in Rome and one in Avignon which was overtly political.

American Protestantism has long been a hodge-podge with a relatively staid main stream, but with fringes richly populated with con artists, fakers, and cultists. (“Place your hands on your television and prey pray with me.”)

Despite this checkered history, Frost discerns two primary and competing themes becoming dominant, at least in American Protestantism. I’m not sure that I buy his conclusions in toto, but I do think his piece is worth reading, as a growing number of religionists seem again to seek terrestrial political power and influence.

Here’s a bit:

One is reading the Epistles of Paul. The other is reading the Minor Prophets.

One is listening to Eric Metaxas and Franklin Graham. The other is listening to William Barber and John Perkins.

One is rallying at the March for Life. The other is getting arrested at Moral Monday protests.

Share

Child Shields 0

Frame One, 1940:  Man on soapbos saying,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.