From Pine View Farm

Culture Warriors category archive

Unholy Union 0

Kim Davis handing marriage license to two men labeled

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

It’s about Time 0

What Noz said.

Wingnuts would be funny if they weren’t so damned dangerous.

Share

Preventing Prevention 0

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette covers the deplorable HPV vaccination rate, which is somewhere under 50%.

Here’s the short version: Parents can’t deal with concept that their kids might have sex,* just like their parents didn’t.

_____________

*This has puzzled me for some time.

Why is it we say, “have sex,” like it’s a cup of coffee and a doughnut, when “sex” (you know, it) is something persons do, like bowling or golf (well, not like golf–sex can be entertaining–let’s say “like pool”)?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Share

A Picture Is Worth 0

Billboard:  Dear Kim Davis, You can't trade your daughter for three goats and a cow.  That means we have already redefined marriage.  (Signed)  PlantingPeace.org

Via Raw Story, which has details.

Share

Red Scare, Republican Style 0

Via C&L.

Share

Religious Freedom, Wingnut Style 0

Checkout clerk to customer:

Via PoliticalProf.

Share

Drill Here, Drill Now 0

Take that, you cow.

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.

Every time I think it can’t get any crazier, it does.

Share

The God in the Mirror 0

Tony Norman considers the much-married Kentucky court clerk Kim Davis, her enablers, and their symps, dupes, and fellow travelers. A nugget:

Once again, God was dragged kicking and screaming into the most common of debased religious fantasies — the one that imagines that God is just teeny enough to be reduced to the sum total of one’s own picayune bigotries.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Persons discussing the Republican campaign.  One of them conclues with


Click for a larger image.

Share

Blessed Unions 0

Kim Davis to two gay men:

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

American Taliban 0

Mike Huckabee and man wearing Arab garb labeled


Click for a larger image.

Share

“Two Different Wars, We Fight in Two Different Wars” 0

Southern Beale suggests that, as regards Kim Davis, many-time married opponent of gay marriage, the discussion is taking place on two different and unrelated levels:

Once again, liberals are arguing a point of logic and fact, while conservatives are arguing hurt fee fees about losing another battle in the culture wars. Look: the fight over gay marriage and the subsequent martyrdom of Kim Davis has zero to do with the Bible. It’s not about religion or theology. Like all culture war issues, it’s about conservatives’ lack of cultural relevance. It’s about how they’ve lost the culture wars and the poor dears just can’t deal with it.

Do please read the rest.

Share

Stray Question 0

Will there come a time when persons who have carnal thoughts be willing to admit that their thoughts are their thoughts, and not some phenomenon foisted upon them by outside agency?

Really, now, if you have a dirty mind, own up to it, take pride in it, revel in it, and, for Pete’s sake, stop blaming others for your carnal thoughts.

They are your thoughts and no one else’s.

Full disclosure:

I have nothing against dirty minds. Mine’s as dirty as they come.

I do have lots of things against hypocrites and Miss (and Mr.) Grundys.

Read more »

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

Huckleberry twits.

Share

“Truth in Labeling” 0

Kim Davis piously entering cell with her hands folded and her imagined halo while casting shadow of Satan labeled

Truth is a concept that the right eschews. Leonard Pitts, Jr., sums it up (emphasis added):

The political right has long had a genius for wrapping noxious notions in code that sounds benign and even noble. The “Patriot Act,” “family values” and “right to work” are fruits of that genius. “Religious liberty” is poised to become their latest masterpiece, the “states’ rights” of the battle for a more homophobic America.

More Pitts at the link.

In related news, Badtux explains “reasonable accommodation.”

Image via Job’s Anger.

Share

Delusions of Virtue 0

Bigotry wants itself some equal rights.

The magnificent chutzpah of the twisted rationalization is stunning. Stupid, nasty, perverse, self-serving, vile, hypocritical, craven, and evil, but stunning.

(Ask me nicely, I’ll tell you what I really think.)

Share

Separate and Sequel 0

John Romano reminds us of another time in which separation of church and state was an issue. A bit:

It is surely odd that presidential candidates today are arguing that religious beliefs should somehow supersede an elected official’s constitutional oath.

For 55 years ago this week, another presidential candidate had to swear the exact opposite to appease a group of skeptical Protestant ministers.

In 1960, the nation was gripped by the idea that a Catholic president might willfully ignore U.S. laws and instead follow the Vatican’s doctrines.

I guess how one some persons feel about separation of church and state depends on whose church is being separated . . . .

Share

A Nation of Immigrants 2

Alfred Doblin is disheartened by Republican rants about brown people.

Most frightening about the tenor of the immigration debate on the Republican side is the unrelenting dehumanizing of immigrants into something less than a whole person. Maybe it is not so accidental that Trump wants to get rid of the 14th Amendment. If America returns to a pre-Civil War mentality, it can just replace blacks as being 3/5ths of a person with all undocumented immigrants.

Scary stuff. Maybe America is not 1933 Munich, but we are not a shining city on a hill, either. This rhetoric by smart, pragmatic politicians like Christie and Bush is dangerous. It shows how much both men will sacrifice to become president. They are willing to abandon all that was good about their public lives just to compete with a billionaire P.T. Barnum with straw-colored hair. Is this the only choice: The scarecrow or the straw man?

Follow the link for the rest.

Share

American Taliban: Sharia and Sharia Like Dept. 0

The Rude One points out that contemptuous of court Kentucky county clerk Kim Davis is, by her actions, attempting to impose Sharia Law. A snippet:

Tweet:  No one is being jailed for practicing her religion.  Someone is being jailed for trying to force someone else to practice her religion.If you don’t get it, let’s make it clear: This is an attempt to enact fundamentalist Christianity as law. It is an attempt to make religious doctrine take the place of secular legal decisions. It is, in theory and operation, no different than the Shariah law that cowardly conservatives fear will overtake the nation, with Muslim Obama as chief mullah or some such shit. You can say you prefer your flavor, but it’s still motherfuckin’ ice cream. (Note: The Rude Pundit really wants some ice cream.)

Image via Kos.

Share

The New Crusaders 0

Giles Frazier writes of England, but his words apply throughout (to use an old term) Christendom.

For years our politicians have piggy-backed upon Christian morality for electoral advantage. We should “feel proud that this is a Christian country”, said Cameron earlier this year (pre-election, of course), in what some might uncharitably see as a call to maintain a Muslim-free view from his Cotswold village. But there is no respectable Christian argument for fortress Europe, surrounded by a new iron curtain of razor wire to keep poor, dark-skinned people out.

More at the link.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.