From Pine View Farm

Culture Warriors category archive

Establishmentarians 0

Emma and the crew delight in CNN’s Boris Sanchez’s unrelenting grilling of establishmentarian Lauren Ventrella’s duplicitous doubletalk.

Aside:

I find it somewhat disconcerting that Ventrella considers an English text of a commandment that Sanchez displayed on the screen to be the “most historical” version of it. As far as I remember, the commandments had been around for two or three millennia before being rendered into English.

Then, again, we are a society of stupid, which idolizes the ignorant and venerates the vacuous.

Share

Republican Thought Police 0

Writing at the Kansas City Star, Joe Kohlburn offers an explanation for recent mobilization of the Republican Thought Police SWAT teams across the country:

Book challenges are never about protecting children. They are about protecting parents from the reality that the world around them is changing.

Follow the link for his reasoning.

Share

Republican Family Values 0

You can’t make this stuff up.

Share

Psychological Projection Anyone? 0

Man standing between a building advertising a drag show and a church where a man with several children stands in the door.  Man points to drag show building and asks,

Click to view the original image.

Looking for some examples?

Share

“History Does Not Repeat Itself, but It Often Rhymes”* 0

Thom hears a rhyme.

_____________

*Mark Twain.

Share

Republican Thought Police 0

Last week, a Florida school board band the book, Ban This Book, a children’s book about school book bans. In response, Scott Maxwell offers some advice to the Republican Thought Police:

To that end, I have a new proposal for Florida’s book-banners: Before pushing to censor any book, you have to first actually read it and then prove you understood it. In this case, “Ban This Book” was written for 8-to-12-year-olds. So you might need to put on your thinking cap.

Follow the link the rest of his response.

Share

Transmogrification 0

At the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Keith Burris discusses the path from populism to nationalism to fascism. Though I’m not sure I agree with everything he says, I think it a timely read. Here’s a bit (emphasis added):

The darker side is reaction against a world that seems to be changing too fast. A world in which an African American man can be president and a woman of color can be vice president. A world in which there is gay marriage and there are trans teenagers.

Reaction is the ignition and the fuel. Not conservatism, not preservation, but reaction.

And reaction often leads to wrecking balls.

That is when nationalist populism turns into something properly called fascism.

Methinks a lot of the antics of the right-wing evangelical they-call-themselves Christians fits right in with Burris’s thoughts on reaction.

Share

Seeing What They Want To See 0

Welcome to a clear case of psychological projection.

The delusion. It gobsmacks.

Share

Still Rising Again after All These Years 0

I think it’s not an exaggeration to suggest that what was once the “Party of Lincoln” is now the Party of the Secesh.

Share

The New Golden Rule 0

According to right-wing evangelical they-call-themselves Christians. it’s “do unto others.”

Share

True Colors 0

Sam Alito's wife on the phone to her husband as she hangs a Confederater flag from the balcony of their house:  Yes, Sam, I put up another flag, but, don't worry, no one can tell if this one's upside down.

Click to view the original image.

Kathryne Rubino has more.

Share

Republican Family Values 0

Heavily-armed GOP Elephant wearing MAGA hat, F**k Biden vest, a slew of buttons with hateful slogans, points to Pride flag and says,

Click to view the original image.

Share

Establishmentarians, Reprise 0

A establishmentarian in robes.

Share

The “Political Correctness” Misdirection Play 0

In an interview, Julia Louis-Dreyfus takes issue with Jerry Seinfeld’s recent complaint about what he dubbed “PC crap.”

“If you look back on comedy and drama both, let’s say 30 years ago, through the lens of today, you might find bits and pieces that don’t age well,” she said. “And I think to have an antenna about sensitivities is not a bad thing. It doesn’t mean that all comedy goes out the window as a result.”

The Veep actress said pushing back on political correctness could be a “red flag.”

“When I hear people starting to complain about political correctness — and I understand why people might push back on it — but to me that’s a red flag, because it sometimes means something else,” she said. “I believe being aware of certain sensitivities is not a bad thing. I don’t know how else to say it.”

My take is simple.

When persons start complaining about “PC crap,” it’s generally because they don’t like being called out for being mean for the sake of mean.

Share

Republican Family Values 0

Share

Establishmentarians 0

Thom discusses Thomas Jefferson’s view of establishmentarians.

Share

Still Rising Again after All These Years, Reprise 0

As Mark Twain said, “History does not repeat itself, but it often rhymes.”

And the rhymes are Trumpeting.

Title:  Many White Americans Fail To Assimilate.  Frame One, captioned

Click for the original image.

Share

American Taliban 0

Thom discusses the danger posed by right-wing evangelical they-call-themselves Christians.

Share

Republican Thought Police 0

The Editorial Staff of the New Orleans Times-Picayune suggests that Republican Thought Police look back on history and shout, “Get me rewrite!”

Share

Still Rising Again after All These Years 0

Via Rolling Stone, meet one of the New Secesh.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.