Geek Stuff category archive
Twits on Twitter 0
Yet another lying twit.
Remember, just because you see it on a computer device screen, it ain’t necessarily so (especially if it’s on “social” media).
Twits Own Twitter 0
Legal-oriented subreddit Xes out links to Twitter. Here’s the gist; more at the link.
(snip)
r/law, a popular subreddit about the law announced last week that it was completely banning links to Twitter for this reason.
It’s All about the Algorithm 0
Rebecca Watson takes an in-depth look four recent studies of the effects of the Zuckerborg’s algorithms. She discusses not only what the researchers reported, but also what limits the Zuckerborg placed on their studies and how many grains of salt you need to digest the research.
Or you can read the transcript, which includes links to various citations in the video.
Facebook Frolics 0
Have you been assimilated by the Zuckerborg? You might be due some ducats.
Geeking Out 0
The QMMP media player on Magiea v. 8 with the Fluxbox window manager. The wallpaper and the QMMP skin are from my collections.
One reason I like QMMP is that I can use my extensive library of Winamp (remember Winamp?) skins with it. Nevertheless, the skin in the screenshot is a QMMP skin.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
Last night we watched a movie we had DVRed*. As a matter of course, we keep closed captioning turned on.
I have become convinced that many studios use AI tools to create closed captions these days. I offer as evidence this line from the said movie (I’m doing this from memory, so I may not have it exactly word-for-word):
Precedented 0
At Psychology Today Blogs, Patrick L. Plaisance sounds a cautionary note about chatbots and other AI tools, urging us to not make the same mistake again. A snippet:
Notwithstanding all the benefits of social media connectedness, our failure to seriously address its harms, coupled with the conceited, unrestrained culture of Silicon Valley, has arguably left us diminished in many important ways. The dark side of our digital platforms has contributed to economic disparity (Heuer, 2015), political tribalism (Bail et al., 2018), eroded concentration levels (e.g., Zhao et al., 2021), data exploitation, cyber-bullying—the list goes on.
In the light of the strikes by the screenwriters guild and SAG-AFTRA, as well as suits for copyright infringement, this is a particularly timely piece and well worth the few minutes it will take to read it.
It’s All about the Algorithm . . . 0
. . . but the hands of those who create the algorithms, no doubt, will be found to be clean in the unlikely event that this case ever comes to trial.
One more time, “social” media isn’t.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
Sarah Silverman, among others, is suing the makers of AI bots for copyright infringement. She has the unmitigated gall to think that Tech Bros shouldn’t just vacuum up the work of others so as to line their own pockets.
A snippet:
“AI needs to be fair and ethical for everyone,” Matthew Butterick, one of the suit’s lawyers, said in a statement. “But Meta is leveraging the work of thousands of authors with no consent, no credit, and no compensation.”
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
Bruce Schneier points out the ChatGPT and similar “AI” bots work by mining data produced by others, then spitting in back out.
He proposes that those whose data is mined deserve to be reimbursed for their contributions. Follow the link for his reasoning.
All That Was Old Is New Again, Reprise 0
Thom reminds us that, as Mark Twain once observed, history doesn’t repeat itself, but it often rhymes.
Legends in Their Own Minds 0
Methinks Atrios is onto something.
Geeking Out 0
Magiea v. 8 with the Fluxbox window manager. The wallpaper is from my collection.
If I had to pick one thing that keeps me using Fluxbox, it’s the right-click menu.
Anywhere the mouse pointer is on the screen, as long as its not on an application window, a right-click brings up the menu.
Artificial? Yes. Intelligent? Not So Much. 0
At Psychology Today Blogs, Matt Grawitch argues that one of the effects of the growing use of artificial “intelligence” has been paradoxically to highlight the importance of human expertise and research. A snippet:
(snip)
Fast-forward to today and the increasing availability of AI-driven tools for research and decision-making. While many of these tools are very confined in terms of the scope of their capabilities, the introduction of broader AI, like Bard and ChatGPT, makes it possible for people to by-pass the process of researching a topic and building an argument and head straight to the conclusion or decision. The dangers of this, though, have been on full display recently, such as when a professor incorrectly flunked all his students for cheating (because ChatGPT told him they had) or the lawyer who used ChatGPT for legal research only to find that the cases he had cited didn’t exist (he was subsequently sanctioned).