From Pine View Farm

Mammon category archive

Systematizing the Game 0

At the Bangor Daily News, Steven Barken wonders what would happen if Monopoly imitated the American economic system. For example . . .

If Monopoly were more like real life, here’s what would happen.

Let’s assume there are five players, and instead of each player receiving $1,500 at the start, the $7,500 they share to begin the game is instead allocated according to the distribution of wealth among Americans. In this scenario, the wealthiest player, Player A, would begin with about $6,668, because the top fifth of Americans hold about 89 percent of the nation’s wealth. Based on the proportion of wealth held by the next fifth of Americans, Player B would begin with $705. Meanwhile, Player C, representing the middle fifth of Americans, would begin with $195, while Player D would begin with $15. Finally, Player E, representing the bottom fifth of Americans, would begin the game $90 in debt.

Follow the link to see how the game plays out.

Share

Panama Rats, One Person’s Story. 0

Just read it.

Share

The Snaring Economy 0

In an article about Uber imitators is buried this nugget, alsmost as an aside.

Under the guise of “sharing,” the snaring economy is facilitating monopoly (emphasis added).

One of the most interesting things about Uber is that it’s consolidating a sector of the economy that had been characterized for so long by hundreds of different taxi companies,” said Brishen Rogers, a Temple University law professor who has written about the Uber-led transformation of the car-hire sector. “And just like Apple has done with all the third-party apps created for its iPhone, it’s no surprise that Uber is creating an ecosystem of smaller companies surrounding it.”

Follow the link for the rest of the article.

Share

“Nobody Likes You When You Are Down and Out” 0

Sing it, Steve Wynn!

The 74-year-old billionaire then tried to break it down for investors.

“Or to put it in a more colloquial way, rich people only like being around rich people, nobody likes being around poor people — especially poor people,” he said.

Share

Panama Rats, the Moral 1

Daniel Ruth read the Panama Papers and finds a moral:

In the movie Network, a bloodless business titan explains to the certifiably insane anchorman Howard Beale that there are no real nations. The world, he rants, is ruled by corporations and currency.

Yes, countries do saber-rattle. They bluster and fulminate. And occasionally somebody invades somebody else for old times’ sake. But what the Panama Papers prove is the universal glue that holds the world together is greed.

Meanwhile, Above the Law offers this handy graph to help you understand what’s going on here:

Panama Paper graph:  the more money you have, the fewer laws apply to you.

Share

How Stuff Works, Panama Rats Dept. 0

Thom talks with Dr. Richard Wolff about what the “Panama Papers” say about the antics of the plutocracy.

Share

Tax Havens 0

Plutocrat standing on U. S. shore facing islands labeled

BadTux has a theory as to why so few Americans were named in the Panama Papers.

Here’s the gist; follow the link for the full discussion:

. . . the United States is already an offshore tax haven. There’s no reason for our rich people to send their money overseas — because they’ve already purchased so many tax breaks here in the United States that they’re already taxed less than they’d be in most of those so-called “tax havens”.

Image via Job’s Anger.

Share

Everybody Must Get Fracked 0

Share

Bad Medicine, Bad Bad Medicine . . . 0

. . . but good news.

The largest pharmaceuticals merger in history, between Pfizer and Allergan, has been abandoned after the US government took fresh steps to clamp down on tax avoidance deals.

The $160bn (£113bn) deal, announced in November, was thrown into doubt following the move by the US Treasury on Monday to make so-called tax inversion deals, by which corporations relocate their headquarters to countries with a lower tax rate, less financially appealing.

Share

Great Moments in You Get What You Pay For (Updated) 1

Facing South points out that among those businesses protesting North Carolina’s “It’s Okay To Hate the Gay” law are a number that helped fund the election of the legislators who sponsored and supported it.

Over 120 companies including Dow Chemical, Red Hat, American Airlines, Apple, PayPal, Cisco, IBM and Google have stated their opposition to the law. CEOs of many of these companies sent a letter to Gov. Pat McCrory (R) last week opposing the law.

But many of these same businesses funded two outside political groups that helped elect five of the bill’s sponsors, 13 other legislators who voted for it, and McCrory, who immediately signed the measure into law. Outside groups are unaffiliated with campaigns and are not allowed to coordinate with candidates.

At least 36 companies that have come out against HB2 so far have given a combined $10.8 million to those Washington, D.C.-based groups, the Republican State Leadership Committee (RSLC) and the Republican Governors Association (RGA), in recent election cycles.

I have nothing to add, because actions speak louder etc.

Details at the link.

Addendum, Comment Rescue Dept.:

George Smith commented:

Why don’t they just start calling these things Pink Triangle laws?

He has a point.

Share

Model Legislation 0

In the Sacramento Bee, Meredith Hattam discusses proposed California legislation to extent to fashion models (who are, after all, performers) the sane workplace protections that actors have enjoyed for decades. She starts by describing her short career as a fashion model:

When I was an 18-year-old college student in San Diego, a woman told me I had the chance to be someone special, but I had to lose weight.

I was 5-foot-9, and 135 pounds, an awkward teenager bullied in high school. My mother was in a hospital with a terminal illness, and my father was there with her. Losing weight was probably the only thing I could control. If I had the potential to be a model, why shouldn’t I at least try?

And so I only ate protein and vegetables and ran 3, 6, 10 miles a day. In eight weeks, I had lost 20 pounds, and I returned to the agent’s office. I modeled in California and New York from 2006 until 2010, when I quit to graduate from college. Most of that time, I was starving, though I denied that fact to my father, my friends, my co-workers. My period stopped. I was cold all the time. I stayed up late nights obsessively chronicling how many calories I’d eaten.

Read the rest.

Share

The Rich Are Different from You and Me 1

They have money.

Share

Something Fishy This Way Comes 0

Share

The “Panama Papers” . . . 1

. . . contain no revelation, only confirmation.

If you didn’t already know that the system is crooked, you haven’t been paying attention.

Share

Food for the Ears 0

Harry Shearer interviews David Cay Johnston about Donald Trump and related topics.

Johnston has followed Trump’s careen career for almost four decades. The discussion ranges over Trump’s business dealings, apparent ties with the mob, history of–er–prevarication, and much, much more, with a side trip into business tax law in theory and in practice.

Listen up, y’hear.

Share

Real Sharks Would Be Ashamed 0

Headline:

Judge says $1,820 repayment on $200 loan ‘unconscionable’

Couple looking at loan office with shark swimming in window and blood running out from under the door.  Man says,

Click to see the image at its original location.

Share

How Stuff Works, the Corporate Shell Game Dept. 0

Frank Clemente discusses how multinational corporations dodge their taxes by expatriating themselves. A nugget:

Pfizer — maker of Lipitor, Lyrica, Viagra and many other prescription drugs — wants to turn its back on America by claiming to be an Irish company through an offshore merger, giving it access to Ireland’s low tax rates. The change would be only on paper. The company would still be run from the United States, enjoying all the benefits of being based in America — such as our taxpayer-supported roads, public colleges and patent protections — without paying its part to support them.

Share

Misdirection Play, Tiny Bubbles Dept. 0

Remember, not every “public interest group” is a public interest group. Witness this “public interest group” that is lobbying against a soda tax in Philly (emphasis added).

The antitax group, which (surprise!) is funded by the American Beverage Association, referenced Niemoeller in response to a tweet from a skeptical Ed Rendell, who asked why doughnuts and other unhealthy foods aren’t being considered for a new tax, too.

I do like my daily diet cola, but, as far as I am concerned, this is like the fellow who, after getting pulled for speeding, turns to the cop and asks, “Why didn’t you pull over that other guy? He was going as fast as I was.”

Share

Flint-Hearted 0

This is contemporary Republican governance writ large, poisoning the poors for profit.

Share

The Snaring Economy 0

“Anti-trust me, bro.”

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.