From Pine View Farm

Republican Lies category archive

Mythbusters 0

Connie Schultz busts myths in the Cleveland Plain Dealer. A nugget:

That’s the thing about those so-called “pampered” union workers. They don’t exist. But the mythology comes in handy when you’re looking to redirect the blame for these tough economic times.

A wise man once wrote, “The working classes didn’t bring this on. It was the big boys that thought the financial drunk was going to last forever and overbought, overmerged and overcapitalized.”

That came from Will Rogers on Oct. 25, 1931.

Today, he’d be accused of engaging in class warfare.

I am reminded of the union mantra: They only call it class warfare when we fight back.

Share

On! Wisconsin 0

James Woolcott takes on the Wis. Kid.

Don’t miss this one.

Share

True Colors 0

Republicans: not a party, a marauding gang.

Brendan comments so I don’t have to.

Share

Denial Is Not Just a River in Egypt 0

It is what Republicans do to facts. Dennis G. demonstrates, using facts to do so.

Share

Spitball’s Old News 0

The only thing new about this is the confession:

The defector who convinced the White House that Iraq had a secret biological weapons programme has admitted for the first time that he lied about his story, then watched in shock as it was used to justify the war.

Rafid Ahmed Alwan al-Janabi, codenamed Curveball by German and American intelligence officials who dealt with his claims, has told the Guardian that he fabricated tales of mobile bioweapons trucks and clandestine factories in an attempt to bring down the Saddam Hussein regime, from which he had fled in 1995.

I remember reading that he got the name “Curveball” because intelligence types thought that was what he was throwing.

Bushies believed him because they wanted war more than they wanted truth.

Share

Mythbusting, Reprise 0

The Stark truth.

Via DelawareLiberal, which posted the transcript.

Share

Pernicious Legacy 0

Cynthia Tucker explains the damage done by Ronald Reagan. A nugget:

He . . . infamously turned voters against their government — or at least the idea of their government. In his first inaugural address, he said, “In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” That set the tone for his presidency, in which he constantly blamed government for creating more problems than it solved.

That has led to our present dilemma — one in which the United States is nearly ungovernable. American voters are more dependent on government than ever. Just try reducing the size of Medicare or Social Security or agricultural subsidies. (Reagan didn’t actually reduce the size of government; he didn’t even try. See chart below.) But they stubbornly resist the idea of raising revenue to cover those programs — because that would feed government!

Some voters are so philosophically opposed to government that they simply block out the idea that programs they love, such as Medicare, are government programs. (Reagan opposed the creation of Medicare, by the way, insisting that it would lead to “socialism.)

Share

Mythbusters 0

Field takes on Reagan.

Sadly, one fears that truth cannot stand against myth.

Share

Bachmann History Spurner in Overdrive 2

Republicans must make stuff up about our history because the facts indict their beliefs and policies:

Via TPM.

Share

At the Beck and Called Out 1

When Glenn Beck’s radio show was canceled in Philly, Beck ranted that Philly was some kind of post-Apocalyptic hell hole out of Grand Theft Auto.

Philadelphia is a big city. It’s got good parts and not so good parts, like any other city. When I worked there, I walked all over the Center City and University City areas without difficulty.

John DeBella, a local Philly radio host, calls out Beck’s lies.

By the way, the Indepence Hall area is just around the corner from where the Philly chapter of Drinking Liberally met for a while when I was there. Because street parking in Philly can be a nightmare difficult, I commonly parked two to four blocks away. Never a problem. (DL has since moved to a location closer to City Hall where street parking is in your dreams–most of the attendees walk or take transit.)

Via Glomarization, who provides more background.

Share

Politifact Awards “Political Lie of the Year” 0

Republican Party continues to dominate the awards.

Share

Old Tea, New Bags 0

Tennessee Teabaggers want to whitewash (you will pardon the expression) slavery.

Rewrite

These folks are nuts.

Share

Suffer the Children 0

Republican legislator claims child labor laws are unconstitutional.

Honestly, these folks are nuts.

Share

Birthwrongs 0

Steve Chapman, writing in the Chicago Tribune, takes a look at the current rage in Wingnut World–repealing the citizenship provisions of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. He skewers the paranoid race-baiting that underlies that effort, including the bizarre fears of Manchurian pregnancies. A nugget:

Last year, U.S. Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas, said terrorists are sending pregnant women to have children on U.S. soil so they can “come back in 20, 25 years” to “blow us up.”

Sure they are, congressman. And while they’re here, they’re putting LSD in the water supply. Unfortunately, the fear of “anchor babies,” as they are known among anti-immigration activists, is spawning not only weird fantasies but also actual legislation.

Read more »

Share

Non-Starters 0

A letter writer in Florida has suggests that Republicans turn the table on President Obama:

How the GOP can reach out to President Barack Obama.

Stop shouting lies about his birthplace and trying to convince the American people that he was born in Kenya and is a Muslim (not that there is anything wrong with being a Muslim).

Admit the truth that the Bush administration and the Republican-controlled Congress was responsible for the breakdown of the financial markets that caused this economic downturn.

Stop spreading falsehoods about the reforms to health care.

Not holding my breath.

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

The confluence of racist lies and gunnuttery: School board member decides to attend meetings backing heat. Wonder whether this leads to a new meaning for the expression, “a heated discussion.”

A Greeley radio station owner who has been broadcasting an anti-Martin Luther King Jr. message was served with a temporary restraining order and lost his permit to carry a concealed weapon Thursday after he allegedly threatened a business rival.

Brett Reese is alleged to have left a voice-mail message for KFKA-AM 1310 owner Justin Sasso on Wednesday in which he threatened a “shootout” if Sasso did not stop his advertising reps from calling on businesses that underwrite Reese’s noncommercial station, KELS-FM 104.7, the complaint said.

(snip)

Critics, including other members of the school board, have said the letter was originally written by white supremacists.

A statement from KFKA said Reese’s letter has been reviewed multiple times by historians, who have labeled it, at best, “full of ‘half truths.’ “

Share

“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0

Fact Check dot org investigates:

On CNN’s “State of the Union with Candy Crowley,” Republican Sen. Mike Lee of Utah perpetuated a falsehood about gun ownership and lower murder rates.

    Lee: And to the contrary, I think there is abundant research suggesting that in cities where more people own guns, the crime rate, especially the murder rate actually goes down.

That’s not true.

Follow the link for the full report.

Share

What Happened to the Tea Party? 0

Share

Clowns to the Left, Jokers to the Right (Updated) 0

I received an email today from one of my leftie mailing lists with the subject line

Tell Sarah Palin: Violent threats have consequences.

You may recall that many found Sarah Palin’s gun sight graphic deplorable when it was first published.

It was indeed crude, rude, stupid, combative, tasteless, and silly all wrapped up in one cute little ball of yarn-spinning (much like Palin herself).

But it was not a threat.

Calling it one detracts from the larger problem and requires ridicule, for it clouds the issue, which is this:

    Adherents of the right wing quickly and casually label those with whom they disagree as traitorous, treasonous, and unAmerican (as well as perverted, godless, and whatever else pops up in their Roget’s–no insult is beyond their pale).

Rightwingers cannot brook disagreement. Anyone who disagrees with them becomes not just an opponent, but also their and the country’s enemy. Once someone is so labeled, he or she becomes fair game for whatever loony-toon decides that the violent rhetoric of the right is not rhetoric, but a call to action.

You seldom hear violent rhetoric from the mainstream left (such as it is). As Bob Cesca pointed out this morning:

And, by the way, screw anyone who says there’s similar language on the left. If there is, who’s saying it? Blog commenters? So what. Liberals leaders aren’t. It’d run entirely contrary to the nature of liberalism for a left-wing authority figure who enjoys similar status to Sarah Palin to suggest that we ought to use “Second Amendment remedies” as a means of pushing our agenda. I can’t possibly imagine Cory Booker or Howard Dean using such metaphors. And even if one slipped out, I don’t know any militaristic, gun-toting… anti-war pacifists. Maybe they’re out there somewhere hanging with leprechauns and hobbits. Nevertheless, it goes without saying that liberals aren’t violent (there are exceptions to everything, but not enough exceptions to make “left-wing extremism” as serious threat).

Furthermore, the rightwing’s tactics of hate militate against reason and compromise.

After all, one cannot reason with a traitor, can one? If one’s political opponent is ipso facto a traitor, simply because he or she opposes you, conciliation becomes impossible.

So, why do they do it?

The facts lean left.

Fear and hate obscure facts. Fear and hate is what they got.

Addendum:

I did not expect to have an update for this post, but I really must direct you to Field’s remarks.

Share

Shorter Scalia: Women Don’t Count 0

Ann Woolner, writing at Bloomberg, explains. A nugget:

“Certainly the Constitution does not require discrimination on the basis of sex,” he said. “The only issue is whether it prohibits it. It doesn’t.”

When the Amendment was written, “Nobody ever thought that that’s what it meant,” Scalia said.

Here we have a perfect example of what’s so very wrong about so-called originalism, the theory Scalia claims to follow. The idea is that the Constitution should be interpreted according to its authors’ original intent, no changes allowed.

The 14th Amendment wasn’t meant to protect women, religious minorities, ethnic groups, and certainly not homosexuals. Written after the Civil War, its single aim was legal rights for newly freed slaves.

Newly freed MALE slaves, that is.

The leopard reveals his spots.

“Originalism” is to the law what the Laughable Curve is to economics: Fancy dress clothes for sacrificing the public good to the benefit of the privileged.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.