From Pine View Farm

Republican Lies category archive

The Birth of a Notion 0

Frame One:  EPA Director watches Rudy Guiliani declare,

Click for the original image.

Share

Immunity Impunity 0

Black couple reading newspaper with headlines,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Pervasive Perfidy 0

Sarah Huckabee Sanders answers a question about Trump's use of the n-word, saying,

Share

All the News that Throws a Fit 0

Display window of electronics store.  Donald Trump saying,

Click for the original image.

Share

How Stuff Works, Gut Out the Vote Dept. 0

Thom and Greg Palast discuss the mechanics of voter suppression, focusing primarily on Florida and Kansas.

Share

The Voter Fraud Fraud 0

Share

Stimulus–>Response 0

Robert Epstein, former Editor-in-Chief at Psychology Today among many other accomplishments, offers a construct for understanding why Donald Trump does and says what he does and says. The concept is “sympathetic audience control”; it does not refer to the individual’s controlling the audience, but rather to the audience’s affecting the individual.

Everyone, of course, is affected by this to some degree. We behave differently at the in-laws than at the neighborhood watering hole, differently in church than at a party or in a business meeting.

Epstein suggests that Trump manifests an extreme version of sympathetic audience control.

I find this completely consistent with Trump’s behavior as observed and reported daily; follow the link to determine whether or not you find his argument persuasive.

Here’s a bit (emphasis added):

Sympathetic audience control and a small time window produce most of the odd cognitive glitches. Moment to moment, Trump either sees a foe and shoots, or he sees a friend and is influenced. In that kind of perceptual world, Trump inevitably shifts his views frequently and has no trouble denying what he said yesterday. All that’s real to him is what friends or foes are saying inside those small time windows. All else is fuzzy, and that’s why he can so easily tell so many lies. From his perspective, lying has no meaning. Only reacting has meaning. Trump reacts.

Aside:

In a similar vein, Dick Polman mourns the death of truth.

Share

A Spicy Publication 0

Farron is not impressed with Sean Spicer’s new book. (Unfortunately for Farron, he makes an egregious error in his rant. Can you spot it?)

(Typo fixed.)

Share

Bale Out 0

Share

Clouds of Witless 0

Donald Trump at podium, surrounded by clouds of speech balloons all saying

Click for the original image.

Share

Stray Thought 0

I’m still unsure what I feel about the propriety of the Red Hen Restaurant’s owner’s decision not to serve Sarah Huckabee Sanders. As the pearl-clutching has demonstrated, it provides right-wingers another opportunity to pretend that they have been victimized in some way when called to task for their misdeeds.

Nevertheless, I am certain of this:

If a baker can legally refuse to bake a cake for a gay couple, a restaurateur most certainly can legally refuse to serve a liar.

Gay is not a choice. Lying is.

Read more »

Share

The Voter Fraud Fraud 0

Thom talks with Greg Palast about Palast’s efforts to expose the workings of the “voter purge” scam.

Share

The Voter Fraud Fraud 0

Kris Kobach komes a kropper.

Share

How Do You Know that Donald Trump Is Lying? 0

Jay Bookman answers, His mouth is open.”

Share

Nor Any Drop To Drink 0

Thom interviews a reporter who thinks the decision to approve the water Flint, Michigan, to be questionable, especially as lead water lines are still in place.

Share

The Trumper-Go-Round 0

Paul Waldman looks at the spin cycle. A snippet (emphasis added):

No matter what ludicrous charge Trump makes, the entire political system reacts as though it might be true. If tomorrow the president said that “Robert Mueller” never existed and the person claiming to be him is actually Nancy Pelosi in elaborate makeup, we’d all find ourselves debating whether Mueller is a real person while House Republicans angrily demand that he produce a DNA sample.

(snip)

These are lies. They’re not “unconfirmed,” they’re not “misstatements,” and they’re not “exaggerations.” They’re lies. They should have been greeted with headlines reading, “President Trump lies to public about Russia investigation”

Follow the link for the numerous examples he was able to cite in one short article.

Share

Trumping Up the Charges 0

Jay Bookman discusses the serial mendacity of Devin Nunes. A nugget:

But if Nunes is not too bright or ethical, he is certainly diligent. That fake scandal was quickly followed by another, this time over the so-called Nunes memo. In that memo, the California congressman claimed to have compiled classified information proving the existence of an anti-Trump cabal within the FBI that had abused its powers in investigating the president. Once again, the conservative noise machine revved itself up; once again, Trump joined the fray, clearing the way to have the Nunes memo declassified and telling aides that it would prove his claim of a witch hunt against him.

Yet when the ballyhooed memo was made public, it too proved to be nonsense . . . .

Share

Both Sides Don’t 0

Thom talks to a caller who equates George Soros with the Koch Brothers. Thom explains why that bird won’t fly, then explores the darker aspect of Republicans’ Soros fetish.

(Misplet wrod corrceted.)

Share

Huh? 0

Title:  Why Trump's Lawyers Don't Want Him To Testify before Mueller.  Image:  Robert Mueller holding up his right hand saying,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

The Art of the Con 0

Farron tries to figure out Republicans’ loyalty to Donald Trump.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.