Republican Lies category archive

Via C&L.

The lies, followed by the truth.

Via Bob Cesca’s Awesome Blog.

The three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and Republican talking points.

Kansas gets creative in the art of disenfranchisement.

Why are Republicans so frightened of the electorate?

(Yeah, I know. The question answers itself.)

The Republican Party spins a fantasy world. Sadly, their base likes to fantasize.

Media Matters looks back at news coverage of the Affordable Care Act during 2013 and finds it wanting:

And this surprises you how?

Two University of Massachusetts Boston academics — Keith G. Bentele, an assistant professor of Sociology, and Erin O’Brien, an associate professor of Political Science — recently published a paper looking at the proposal and passage of restrictive voter access legislation from 2006 to 2011. In the paper, titled “Jim Crow 2.0? Why States Consider and Adopt Restrictive Voter Access Policies,” the authors conclude that restrictive voter measures are connected to both partisan and racial factors.

“We looked at proposed and passage over this period, and we looked at just 2011 specifically,” Bentele told TPM in an interview this week. “And you have this consistent emergence — over and over and over — these partisan and racial factors are the most strongly associated with these outcomes.”

More at the link.

Below the fold because it autoplays.

Read more »

Dick Polman wonders why Republicans fell for the patently false wingnut charge that President Obama is closing the U. S. Embassy to the Vatican (he’s not, never was, never would) and why Republicans are so susceptible to lies and lying liars.

Hopefully, on some not too distant day, a smart historian with a degree in psychology will look back on this era and analyze why so many conservatives have become allergic to factual reality. This psychosis has manifested itself so often – among the birthers, the skeet shoot paranoids, the Gettysburg truthers, the list is endless – that one is tempted to simply ignore the behavior. But no. In the name of rationalism, it needs to be called out.

Read the rest.

Get out the bucks, gut out the vote.

Dick Polman on the latest wingnut tizzy in a teapot:

Since Abe’s assassination, there have been 27 presidents. Care to guess how many of them have participated in Gettysburg anniversary ceremonies? I’ll save you the time. Here’s the answer:

One.

That was William Howard Taft, in 1909.

And it bears noting that a goodly part of the Republican Party wishes that the other side had won the Battle of Gettysburg anyhoo.

More tales to tantrums at the link.

Gutting out the vote in Ohio.

Michael Smerconish realizes that he has to vote absentee in a recent local election and runs afoul of the Republican gut-out-the-vote initiative. He managed to vote, but at significant inconvenience, inconvenience which might have deterred many persons (which, natch, is the reason for the inconvenience):

Clearly we need to boost participation. And yet, around the country, most election changes are headed in the wrong direction, and at an escalating pace.

That’s the net effect of Shelby County v. Holder, in which the Supreme Court ruled in June that nine states (and several other counties and municipalities) that had been required under the Voting Rights Act to obtain preclearance before adopting new laws concerning elections would no longer be so obligated. Freed of Justice Department oversight, many states are enacting laws that would not have been permitted before the decision.

Read the full story at the link.

What jason330 said.

Graham.

Cracker.

’nuff said.

If you wonder why the Republican Party is so determined to gut out the vote, just read this.