Political Economy category archive
Gang of Sickness 0
Facing South parses the “compromise” proposal from the Gang of Six.
“Gang” is right.
Here are some snippets:
Lowest rate to which that would be reduced by the Gang of Six proposal: 23%
Estimated amount in profits being held offshore by U.S. companies, which under the plan would see an end to taxation of most of their overseas profits: $1 trillion
Follow the link for the full post and the links to their sources.
A Modest Proposal 1
I have a pretty low opinion of Ralph Nader.
His best days are far behind him, and his fits of scolding everyone have become tiresome.
Then there’s that enabling George the Worst thing.
But I must admit that he raises a good question in a recent column in the Chicago Trib, to wit (I’m paraphrasing here):
Read it.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
For all practical purposes, no change:
“Duck, Dodge, and Dismantle” 2
Aside:
The interviewer spins wheels to get her to commit to concessions.
Of course, if she did so, they would not longer be “concessions.”
They would be the starting point in the next round of talks.
(I nearly wrote “negotiations” instead of “talks,” but there aren’t any “negotiations.” It takes two to “negotiate.” Going limp on the floor and yelling “my way or the highway” in Republican fashion is not “negotiating.”)
A Modest Proposal 0
Dana Garrett has a suggestion:
So instead of a balanced budget amendment, I recommend an amendment to the constitution that requires Congress to raise taxes across the board whenever the nation undertakes a major military endeavor to cover the FULL cost of the military endeavor.
It doesn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell, but it does point out the absurdity of the current budget kabuki in Washington.
Follow the link to read his entire argument.
Update from the Foreclosure-Based Economy 0
Philly dot com takes a look at foreclosures in Willingboro, N. J., one of the original Levittowns.
The foreclosure market is still going strong:
In 2005, 209 foreclosure actions were filed against homeowners in Willingboro. In 2006, when the crisis hit, the number shot up 34 percent to 281, according to an analysis from American Foreclosures Inc., a firm that collects detailed foreclosure data.
Since 2005, about 2,400 foreclosures have been filed in the township of 12,000 homes, according to the analysis.
I am going to predict that the foreclosure segment of the economy is starting to weaken and that jobs created by the need to process foreclosures may be in jeopardy.
Why? Because I am starting to see commercials on television inviting Joe and Jane Viewer to call this number! or click that website! to learn how they, too, can get in on the foreclosure bonanza and pick up a houses for “as little as $1,000.00!”
I think this is the foreclosure-based economy’s equivalent to all those mailings we used to get from CountryWide and AmeriQuest, inviting us to jump on the mortgage-go-round.
Foreclosure entrepreneurs are running out of a market; they need to drum up new marks.
No doubt this will be followed by shows on cable channels with names like, “Flip This Foreclosure.” Other, lesser cable channels will follow with clones. Viewers by the twos and threes will drive ratings.
After a couple of years, pundits will start to wonder whether there is a “foreclosure bubble” that has become unsustainable.
Other pundits will argue that “God ain’t making no more foreclosures,” so the market for foreclosures should continue to thrive and grow.
And then–well, you know.
Crash.
This time, though, no one will become unemployed and homeless, because everyone who is not a CEO or hedge fund manager already will be living in tent cities and begging at freeway exits.
Coming up:
The emerging new market in tricked-out shopping carts: the latest rage in tent cities.
And a new show on the latest trend to help families make ends meet: Pimp My Bride.
Countering the Crazy 0
Decoding the eleven dimensional chess.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Via Bob Cesca.
Your Defense Dollars at Work 0
One of the projects involves improving the “official entertainment space” in the house.
Cutting social security will no doubt fix this.
In other news, LiberalGeek has 10 suggestions for reducing government expenses that are far more realistic than anything Republicans have advanced.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Still over 400k:
Aside:
How can I get a job as one of those forecasters?
They are less accurate than astrologers and better paid.
Rabbit Holes, War Spending Dept. 0
Steve Chapman sums it up in the Chicago Trib:
Pensions Pending 1
This is something that has been nagging at me for some time, but I wasn’t sure how to address it. Now a letter writer to the Philly Inquirer has saved me the trouble.
When politicians complain about the cost of retirees’ pensions, they often leave out the full term: “Unfunded pension obligations.”
It’s not the pensions. It’s the politicians who refused to plan for them, but instead have used pension funds for other purposes.
The situation with social security is similar.
Social Security isn’t broke; it’s looted, sacrificed to the fetish against taxes citizens paying for the services they demand from the government.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
For all practical purposes, this is no change from last week:
Supply-chain disruptions from Japan’s March earthquake, European default concerns and gasoline prices that neared $4 a gallon prompted some companies in recent weeks to fire workers, further weighing on the consumer spending that makes up two thirds of the economy. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg forecast the Labor Department will report tomorrow that the unemployment rate in June held unchanged at 9.1 percent.
The decrease in persons receiving extended benefits is meaningless, as many persons are still unemployed but are aging out of benefits into destitution.
Boogie Woogie Budget Boys 0
Daniel Ruth at the St. Petersburg Times writes about what he calls the “Washington kabuki.” I can’t say I agree fully with this, bit I agree mostly. I’m glad he included war defense spending. A nugget:
If you are a Democrat you will not fill a $14.5 trillion hole by simply raising taxes, unless you also are willing to fiddle around with entitlement spending on stuff like Social Security and Medicare, as well as defense.
If you are a Republican you will not address the debt problem by opposing an increase in taxes, or at least making sure wealthy people and corporations pay their fair share of the tax burden they should be paying anyway. When General Electric, which made a profit of $14.2 billion last year, paid zero in corporate taxes, something is horribly nuts.
And Wesley Snipes went to jail for not paying his taxes?
For both sides, the debt crisis won’t be solved if every time someone offers a proposal Washington’s special interest lobbies start sobbing uncontrollably while accusing the offending politico of being an anti-American sot with Marxist and/or fascist tendencies.
Follow the link. The first part of the column, in which he describes the empty ritual of Washington meetings, is a hoot.
(Link fixed.)
Third Rail Ryan 0
Had Paul Ryan offered something constructive about Medicare, he might not have turned himself into a third rail for Republican candidates.
But the public quickly realized that, ultimately, his plan was classic Republicanism: Decreasing the quantity and quality of services while turning buckets of money over to Wall Street bonus babies.
In other words, more rich richer, poor poorer.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
The patient’s condition is unchanged.
No doubt laying off more teachers will fix this.









