Political Economy category archive
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
For all practical purposes, this is no change from last week:
Supply-chain disruptions from Japan’s March earthquake, European default concerns and gasoline prices that neared $4 a gallon prompted some companies in recent weeks to fire workers, further weighing on the consumer spending that makes up two thirds of the economy. Economists surveyed by Bloomberg forecast the Labor Department will report tomorrow that the unemployment rate in June held unchanged at 9.1 percent.
The decrease in persons receiving extended benefits is meaningless, as many persons are still unemployed but are aging out of benefits into destitution.
Boogie Woogie Budget Boys 0
Daniel Ruth at the St. Petersburg Times writes about what he calls the “Washington kabuki.” I can’t say I agree fully with this, bit I agree mostly. I’m glad he included war defense spending. A nugget:
If you are a Democrat you will not fill a $14.5 trillion hole by simply raising taxes, unless you also are willing to fiddle around with entitlement spending on stuff like Social Security and Medicare, as well as defense.
If you are a Republican you will not address the debt problem by opposing an increase in taxes, or at least making sure wealthy people and corporations pay their fair share of the tax burden they should be paying anyway. When General Electric, which made a profit of $14.2 billion last year, paid zero in corporate taxes, something is horribly nuts.
And Wesley Snipes went to jail for not paying his taxes?
For both sides, the debt crisis won’t be solved if every time someone offers a proposal Washington’s special interest lobbies start sobbing uncontrollably while accusing the offending politico of being an anti-American sot with Marxist and/or fascist tendencies.
Follow the link. The first part of the column, in which he describes the empty ritual of Washington meetings, is a hoot.
(Link fixed.)
Third Rail Ryan 0
Had Paul Ryan offered something constructive about Medicare, he might not have turned himself into a third rail for Republican candidates.
But the public quickly realized that, ultimately, his plan was classic Republicanism: Decreasing the quantity and quality of services while turning buckets of money over to Wall Street bonus babies.
In other words, more rich richer, poor poorer.
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
The patient’s condition is unchanged.
No doubt laying off more teachers will fix this.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
The Republican campaign strategy continues:
Stocks slumped and Treasury securities rose as the figures, combined with a drop in new-home sales, showed the recovery was struggling to gain momentum. Bernanke said yesterday that joblessness above 9 percent and weakness in housing show the economy’s “headwinds” may be stronger than Fed policy makers initially estimated.
(snip)
Purchases of new homes dropped 2.1 percent in May to a 319,000 annual rate, figures from the Commerce Department showed today in Washington. The median price of new properties sold declined from a year earlier.
Congressional Democrats seem to have become vertebrates; they’ve called out the Republican strategy:
We’ll see how long that lasts.
Also, what Atrios said.
Endless War and the Entitlement Society 1
At the Asia Times, Ellen Brown considers how military spending is actually a drag on the economy. A nugget (emphasis added):
Most politicians understand … that weapons production is currently the number one industrial export product of the US. They know that major industrial job creation is largely coming from the Pentagon. Thus most politicians, from both parties, want to continue to support the military industrial complex gravy train for their communities.
That explains why the country seems to be permanently at war. If we had peace, the war machine would be out of a job. Every year since World War II, the US has been at war somewhere. It has been said that if we didn’t have a war to fight, we would have to create one just to keep the war business going. We have a military empire of over 800 bases around the world. What is to become of them when the lion lies down with the lamb and peace reigns everywhere?
She goes on the explore ways to move to an economy that’s not based on killing somebody somewhere day after day.
“Waste, Fraud, and Abuse” 0
Blah, blah, blah.
The truth is, there just isn’t that much of it in real terms. The real waste, fraud, and abuse are in what items are funded, not in how the funds are spent.
Click for a larger image.
Meanwhile, piles of money are set on fire in the Middle East and South Asia.
Legal Vigorish 0
Da mob got nuttin’ on dis racket:
Fifteen minutes after turning over the car’s title to a title lender in Suffolk, he emerged with the cash his girlfriend needed.
That was in late August.
Today, Wood regrets being in such a hurry. After paying more than $700 so far for the $500, he still owes $1,265, much of it interest, and is behind on his monthly payments, he said.
If he fails to pay what he owes, the 20-year-old Suffolk resident likely will lose his car, which is essential for getting to work and running errands for his girlfriend, Wood said.
Follow the link for much more.
Legacy 0
Celebrate thirty years of Reagonomics’s making the rich richer and the poor poorer.
From MarketWatch:
Well, it turns out that working longer is indeed an option, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute latest study. The only problem is that the latest research shows that you’ll have to work much longer than you anticipated. In fact, many Americans will have to keep on working well into their 70s and 80s to afford retirement, according to the study, titled “The Impact of Deferring Retirement Age on Retirement Income Adequacy.”
What’s more, it’s even worse for low-income workers, according Jack VanDerhei, one of the co-authors of the study. Those who earned (on average over the course of their careers) less than $11,700 per year, the lowest income quartile, would need to defer retirement till age 84 before 90% of those households would have just a 50% chance of affording retirement.
Much more at the link, if you can bear it.
________________________
Note: Yeah, except for that pesky no-jobs-to-be-had thing.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Still over 400k:
Further declines in dismissals followed by gains in hiring would help sustain consumer spending, which accounts for about 70 percent of the economy. While payrolls have been climbing, a jobless rate above 9 percent underscores the need for a pickup in employment that will spur an expansion entering its third year.
As Dick Destiny has repeatedly pointed out, as in this post, trying to prosper on consumption without creation is a fool’s game.
Zombinomics 1
Writing as “Spengler” at Asia Times, David P. Goldman is gloomy. A nugget:
Read the whole thing, then go have a drink. Or four.
Update from the Foreclosure-Based Economy 0
Foreclosures are just fine, thank you, Country Wide and Ameriquest:
Meanwhile, the median price of homes sold last month dipped to $189,000, down 11.1 percent from May 2010, the Virginia Beach-based multiple listing service reported.
Nearly one of every three homes sold in May – 31 percent – were in foreclosure or sold for less than what the homeowner owed, according to the report. That’s up from 21 percent a year ago.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
No doubt throwing more persons out of work austerity will fix this:
Update from the Foreclosure-Based Economy 0
Strong indicators for continued foreclosures:
The firm’s quarterly report said 22,967 more mortgages in the region will be underwater if home prices decline 5 percent from current levels.
Economists and real estate experts say that owing more on a home than it is worth is one of the most common precursors to foreclosure.
As Duncan frequently points out, our Galtian overlords have broken the economy and are not bothering to put it back together.
Rather, they’re off looking for the next bubblelicious con.
Nothing To Do, Nowhere To Go 0
Still above 400k:
Bloomberg put “less that forecast in its headline.”*
Less than whose forecast? one might ask.
Why, Bloomberg’s, of course.
This says nothing about unemployment, but something about forecasters.
__________________________
*As it that actually meant anything to anyone other than bookies.










