Republican Hypocrisy category archive
The Fifth Freedom: Freedom To Hate 2

It’s a coordinated campaign of calumny; hate sells, and hate is what they got.
Image via Bob Cesca’s Awesome Blog.
Founders and Expounders 0
Celebrate President’s Day with the Rude One (warning: rude).
Rugged Individualists 2
Teabaggery in a nutshell: Handouts for me, but not for thee.
GRandhog Day (Updated) 0
Juanita Jean assesses Rand Paul, serial plagiarist:
Rand Paul lives in the movie Groundhog Day where he keeps trying to steal without getting caught.
Details at the link.
Addendum:
Noz adds a lawyer’s perspective.
The Fee Hand of the Market 0
“Anti-regulation” Republicans attempt to regulate wind energy out of business.
Makers and Takers 0
My friend and I were talking yesterday about what it would be like to have no heat when the temperature is in the 20s and you have no fireplaces or other sources of heat and, likely, because of frozen pipes, no water. I don’t want to imagine.
I used to live on the Main Line, where it seems all cold Hell is breaking lose. It really was a nice place to live; I feel for the persons freezing in their dwellings.
But I have been made cynical, I guess because I pay attention.
When I read this story, all I could think was that here’s yet another wingnut governor who decries the evul fedrul guvmint except when his hand is out.
Not nice people.
American Originals 0
In the Roanoke Times, Harvard Law Professor Cass Sunstein points out three major issues with Constitutional “originalism,” the theory the U. S. Constitution should be interpreted as if the horse were still the primary mode of transportation and outhouses the primary sanitation device. Here’s the first:
It seems like an appealing argument, but it faces three objections. The first is historical. Did those who ratified the Constitution embrace originalism? If not, originalism turns out to be self-contradictory, because the original understanding rejected originalism as Scalia and Thomas understand it.
Sunstein is charitable to treat originalism as a subject of polite discourse.
It is, at its origination and in its manifestation, an intellectual scam, a pretty theory to give legitimacy to those who would return our social structures to status quo ante bellum (and you know to which bellum I refer).
“Yes, but He’s Sincere about Being a Bigot” 0
You can’t make this stuff up (emphasis added).
“Specifically, I plan to propose a new section in Article I – the Pennsylvania ‘bill of rights’ – that will prohibit government from punishing an individual or entity if the individual or entity makes hiring or other employment decisions, or provides services, accommodations (including housing accommodations), advantages, facilities, goods or privileges based on sincerely held beliefs,” the memo says.
When I grew up in the Jim Crow South, I knew many folks who made “hiring or other employment decisions, or provide(d) services, accommodations (including housing accommodations), advantages, facilities, goods or privileges” based on sincerely held beliefs–beliefs that they had the God-given right to lord it over darkies, wimmens, and any one else who was not a white folk like them.
Folks who think like that were bigots then, they are bigots now, and they will be bigots tomorrow.
These are folks who put the “sin” in sincerity.
Hackery 0
Charles Krauthammer clutches his pearls because President Obama “never had his heart in the Afghanistan War.”
Why the hell should he?
It was George the Worst’s War, and he blew it. In the process of not getting Osama bin Laden, he sent hundreds of Americans and thousands of Afghanis to useless, pointless death (and put First Son in harm’s way).
Nevertheless, what Krauthammer and his fellows most want is for you to forget that George the Worst ever happened. Even more than that, they want you to forget that Krauthammer, Cal Thomas, David Brooks, and their like spent eight years trying to convince you that George the Worst was the greatest thinker since Socrates.
Why these folks have not been expelled from my local rag’s editorial pages escapes me. I guess that, once you whore yourself out for wingnut welfare, you are fixed for life.
Right-wing hacks: Always wrong, never penalized.
And, yes, I’m fed up. Fed up that intellectual incompetence seems to be a job requirement for “conservative” political columnists.
They are not nice people.
“Some Pigs Are More Equal Than Others” 0
Delaware Liberal explicates democracy, teabagger style.
Misdirection Plays, The Welfare Fraud Fraud 0
In the Bangor Daily News, Ethan Strimbling crunches the numbers and finds the actual welfarm queens:
Yet where do Republicans focus all their energy? Well you know. The question is why? Unfortunately, the answer to that is simply pure ideology and politics.
Follow the link for the arithmetic.
Contemporary Republicanism Is Not “Conservative” 0
It’s just mean for the sake of being mean.
E. J. Dionne explains:
This, of course, is a quite precise description of what happened when Gov. Chris Christie’s aides ordered the closure of some access lanes to the George Washington Bridge last September.











