From Pine View Farm

Republican Hypocrisy category archive

Multiple Count Indictment 0

Via the Booman, see the Bill of Particulars.

Share

Cantor’s Cant: Facts vs. Fantasy 0

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Via the Richmonder.

Share

Cantor’s Cant, No Duplicity Too Baldfaced Dept. (Updated) 0

Steve Benen on Our Boy Eric’s hopping bandwagons whose funding he opposed:

Indeed, there’s a clear pattern here. In April 2009, Cantor heralded a high-speed rail project in his district, made possible by the stimulus package. Just two months prior, Cantor fought tooth and nail to prevent that project from existing, and specifically mocked government funding on high-speed rail.

If Cantor were the only hypocrite in his caucus, the larger phenomenon wouldn’t be nearly as offensive. But at last count, 128 House Republicans — nearly three-quarters of the total — have tried to claim credit for creating jobs through a Recovery Act that they fought to kill, and continue to disparage.

Addendum:

The Richmonder was there.

Share

What Zandar Said 0

An excerpt:

It’s the same folks who say America is a the greatest country on Earth, that its people are exceptional and destined, who talk about how special we are as a people, invariably they are the first to turn on their neighbors and say “I don’t care if there’s not any jobs out there, go paint fences and collect aluminum cans. I’m not helping you. Get a job you lazy bastard.”

Share

A New Angle on Forthrightness, Nay, Fifthrightness Even 0

(Link fixed.)

You can’t make this stuff up:

Standing up for her beliefs, except when sitting down on them:

After the former state Rep won Nevada’s Republican Senate primary, Angle’s campaign took down most of its website, and later replaced it with a relaunched version that in some ways toned down her right-wing rhetoric. But Internet pages are rarely ever forgotten — the Reid campaign saved the old version, and put up a website called “The Real Sharron Angle,” reproducing the old content.

Then, they say, the Angle campaign sent them a cease-and-desist letter, claiming misuse of copyrighted materials in the reposting of the old website . . . .

One wonders why, now that she has the nomination, she doesn’t want voters in the General Election to know what she really stands for.

Share

On the Origins of “Constitutional Originalism” 1

Originalism” is the doctrine of Constitutional interpretation that asserts that the Constitution must be interpreted as originally written world has not changed since 1789.

Note that the writers of the Constitution were not originalists. They changed the damned thing as soon as it was passed, by adding 12–count ’em, 12–amendments.

Originalism did not originate from the pure logic of philosophical thinkers reaching the conclusion that the Constitution must be interpreted as originally written, so that therefore social security, environmental protections, FDA drug testing, and other such stuff which prevents them what has from reducing them what has not to serfdom must be done away with.

Rather, the folks who came up with originalism sat around in a great vaulted room and asked themselves,

Selves, how can we do away with social security, environmental protections, FDA drug testing, and other such stuff which prevents them what has from whatever we want to do, regardless of consequence, to amass as much money as possible?

After great thought in great think tanks funded by them what has, lo! great sophistry burst forth. They spake:

Aha! We’ll come up with something that sounds scholarly, pedantic, and oh so historical, while feigning reverence for democracy, and we shall give it a name of awkward sound and many syllables.

We shall call it originalism.

Originalism is not scholarship. It is not even strategy. It is tactic.

Share

Marshalling the Base 1

No doubt the Honorable Mr. Marshall’s having been one of “those kind of people” had nothing to do with it.

From TPM:

Looks like Senate Judiciary Republicans have at least one unified talking point today: Justice Thurgood Marshall, the first African-American to ever serve on the Supreme Court, was an “activist judge.” As Elena Kagan kept on her listening face, multiple senators slammed both Marshall’s judicial philosophy and her service as his clerk in the late 1980s.

Grandstanding bigotry is such a tribute to Republicanism.

Share

Driving While Brown 0

The hysteria spreads.

Underlying this is that modern Republicanism feeds on creating and exploiting fear.

Share

Delusions Illustrated 0

“Personally, I take every thing Glenn says on faith . . . because there’s never any evidence . . . .”

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Yahweh or No Way – The Blues Brothers & Glenn Beck
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor Fox News

Martin Luther King, Jr., is spinning in his grave.

Via TPM.

Share

Have Cake, Eat It Too, Old MacDonald Dept. 0

They really do think that they should have it both ways.

Just to get this straight, I’m not against farm subsidies per se, as long as they go family farmers, rather than to Huge Corporate Oligopolies.

It’s the hypocrisy.

Share

Plus Ca Change 1

Down with Tyranny looks at the Know Nothings–the Teabaggers of their time.

Share

Greater Wingnuttery XLXIX 0

Willing to sacrifice the Gulf.

Share

Spill Here, Spill Now, Have Cake, Eat It Too Dept. (Updated) 0

Dick Polman:

When word got around yesterday afternoon that BP had indeed agreed to establish a $20-billion escrow redemption fund, I knew it was only a matter of hours before Obama’s critics jerked their knees anew, and declared that the president (whom they had previously condemned for not being tough enough during the oil spill crisis) was now being too tough, especially in his attitude toward poor old BP. So I started the countdown. Three, two, one…sure enough, there it was: an email blast, late in the day, from the House conservatives who call themselves the Republican Study Committee. Who better to defend the worst environmental despoilers in the nation’s history, and paint BP as the victim of presidential thuggery?

Their gall no longer surprises, but it still appalls.

Addendum:

The Richmonder weighs in.

Addendum-Dee-Dum-Dum:

Steve Benen:

We talked earlier about the lengths Republicans are going to side with BP, despite the oil giant’s role in the worst environmental disaster in American history. I argued that the GOP is approaching the point at which Dems will reasonably be able to argue that Republicans are siding with BP over the country.

(snip)

I just never thought I’d see the day when a leading Republican publicly groveled to a foreign CEO, who just happens to be leading a company responsible for a devastating oil spill disaster.

Share

Spill Here, Spill Now, Can’t Win for Losing Dept. 0

Steve Chapman in the Chicago Trib:

Not long ago, Barack Obama was pilloried for being too activist, too meddlesome and too inclined to see himself as the messiah. He was forcing health care reform down our throats, running General Motors, wrecking the financial system and promising to make the oceans recede.

But that was a different guy, from a parallel universe. The President Obama we all know is a passive, detached do-nothing. Or so we have been hearing since the BP oil spill gained our attention.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Republican who once denounced Democrats for scheming to “increase dependence on government,” now demands that Washington do more for his state.

Former GOP House Speaker Newt Gingrich, who recently urged Congress to zero out the Environmental Protection Agency, challenges the administration to “save the Louisiana coast, save the fisheries, save the wetlands.”

Funny how nobody said that at the 2008 Republican National Convention, where the chant was “drill, baby, drill.” Back then, real men didn’t protect sea turtles.

Read the whole thing.

Afterthought:

If President Obama were to raise high his staff, part the waters of the Potomac River, and lead us all to the land of milk and honey, Republicans would find fault.

They would fault him for holding his staff at the wrong angle, parting the river too much or too little, using a staff of ash rather than maple, picking the wrong place to part the waters, or finding too much milk and not enough honey, or something. Or all those things.

We don’t know what the complaint would be, but we can be certain that it would be.

Finding fault when you have no ideas is easier than finding ideas.

Share

Spill Here, Spill Now, Republicans, ACORN, and BP Dept. 0

Rachel Maddow looks for the outrage:

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Excerpt:

As of June, BP has received $837 million this year in federal contracts. Where is the call to defund this company?

Some of the same Republicans were basically tripping over themselves to bury ACORN last year are lining up behind BP.

The Republican Party, then and now the Party of Privilege.

Via the Brad Blog.

Share

Internal Contradictions 0

The Boston Globe skewers the silliness of teabaggery:

. . . Tea Partiers and others galvanized by anger over the financial meltdown have somehow ended up embracing candidates who would give Wall Street license to wreak greater havoc. It’s an impressive con job: Candidates whose real agenda is a deregulated market are claiming the mantle of the antibailout movement.

Share

Colorblinders 0

Jamelle Bouie points how “colorblind” isn’t:

In an earlier era, this same “colorblind racist philosophy” was used to craft laws targeting African-Americans. Rarely were Jim Crow laws explicitly racist, instead, they relied on “colorblind” mechanisms — like poll taxes and grandfather clauses — to achieve the desired, anti-black outcome. Arizona’s immigration law is obviously not the same as Jim Crow, but it’s animated by the same basic idea of “colorblindness” — if something doesn’t explicitly mention race, then it can’t be racist. And the converse is also true, anything that mentions race is de facto racist, even if it’s designed to ameliorate racial prejudice . . . .

(I remember my daddy talking about paying his poll tax. He was white. He could afford it.)

While the Booman describes how the odious Southern Strategy, which the Republican Party created to capture the South, has captured the Republican Party:

The modern GOP doesn’t have a coherent governing philosophy. But they are more united than ever. Race hatred is central to that unity, . . . .

Read both posts. And weep along with Lincoln.

Share

Have Cake, Eat It Too, Rand Paul Dept. 3

Persons who call themselve “Libertarians say that they believe in the Constitution (indeed, they speak of it almost as if it were inerrant), except, of course, when they don’t.

On the same topic, the Atlanta Journal Constitution recalls a pamphlet from the 1964 Goldwater campaign:

EMPLOYEES
READ THIS:

Did you know that Lyndon Johnson’s Civil Rights Bill can get you fired from your job and give it to a person of another race? No matter what ability you have to do your job … or how much seniority you have on your job … you can lose your job because of Johnson’s Civil Rights Bill. This is your last chance. Vote to put an end to racial favoritism…vote to protect your job…your family…your home.

EMPLOYERS
READ THIS:

This is your last chance to save your freedom to run your own business as you choose!

Color, of course, has nothing to do with it.

Share

Wait for It 0

Steve M.:

. . . I’d say it’s going to take about an hour and a half for the right-wing talking points to change from While the Gulf is being destroyed, hapless Obama is ceding power to BP!!! to See? The government did nothing and private industry got the spill under control! Just goes to show — you can’t trust big government to do anything right!!!

Share

“No” 0

To answer Bob Cesca’s question.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.