Republican Hypocrisy category archive
Courting Disaster 0
Joe Patrice dissects the duplicity of Cannon’s law.
Myth Buster 0
In the course of a longer article how, in evaluating candidates for office, we need to look at the big picture when evaluating candidates for office, the Portland Press-Herald’s Victoria Hugo-Vidal makes a trenchant observation (emphasis added):
Follow the link for context.
Immunity Impunity
0
Der Spiegel talks with Harvard law professor Lawrence Tribe about the Supreme Supremacist Court’s recent decision granting Donald Trump “presidential immunity” for “official acts.” Professor Tribe finds the decision to be–er–of questionable legitimacy.
It is a timely and disturbing read. Here’s a tiny bit of it (emphasis in the original):
Tribe: My colleagues in the government department are exactly right. It is a dangerous phenomenon. Minorities are entitled to protection in every respect. But no minority should be able to run roughshod over the majority. After all, it is not a minority of the oppressed that has gained such power in our system. It is the minority of those with the greatest wealth and the best connections. And they are now running the show in a way that is very dangerous to our democracy.
If One Standard Is Good, Two Must Be Better 0
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA) rips into the hypocrisy of Republicans’ attempting to punish AG Merrick Garland for refusing to comply with a subpoena while a many Republicans have ignored subpoenas without penalty or protest from their own party.
Via C&L, which has commentary.
The Courage of His Conniptions 0
Methinks this sets some kind of new record for weasel-wording.
The Bell Tolls . . . . 0
Jim Wright is, let’s see here, somewhat pessimistic.
The Perjurors 0
At Above the Law, Joe Patrice delineates the deceit.
Originalist Sin 0
PoliticalProf parses the perfidy.
The Rule of Lawless 0
At Above the Law, Joe Patrice dissects the Supreme Supremacist Court’s duplicitous doubletalk crowning Donald Trump (or, for that matter, any President, including Joe Biden, though methinks he would decline the privilege, as he believes in the rule of law) as 
a king somehow above the rule of law.
The Founding Fathers, who, granted, had many flaws, not the least of which was tolerance of chattel slavery, wished to escape the rule of a sovereign,
Today’s Republican Party wishes to crown one.
Unprecedentedly Partisan 0
Michael in Norfolk, a lawyer with decades of experience, notes that
Follow the link for context.









