From Pine View Farm

“That Conversation about Race” category archive

Buffaloed on the Disinformation Superhighway 0

The SPLC dissects the misdirection play. Here’s how the article begins; follow the link for the evidence.

As white supremacist violence has emerged as a predominant threat to national security and a recurrent topic in the news, the far right has increasingly leaned on disinformation campaigns to deny or distort that reality. Extremists and collaborators often use the tactic of suggesting liberals, leftists or the federal government staged acts of far-right terrorism. One recent example is using Twitter’s trending topics to float the lie that antifa caused the attack on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Polls showed that many Republicans ultimately believe such lies, proving the effort successful.

In the wake of the Buffalo, New York, mass shooting, veteran disinformation posters on Twitter such as male supremacist Mike Cernovich and Malaysia-based RT (formerly Russia Today) contributor Ian Miles Cheong led a campaign to suggest that the terrorist harbored a left-wing ideology . . . .

Share

A Notion of Immigrants 0

PoliticalProf.

Share

Hate and Mongers of Hate 0

Seth skewers points out the internal contradictions in the right-wing’s racist “great replacement theory” myth lie.

We are a society of stupid.

Share

The Transmogrification 0

Title:  The Great Replacement.  Image One, titled

Click to view the original image.

Share

Still Rising Again after All These Years 0

Field predicts that those who profit from America’s original sin will continue to foment death. An excerpt from his poat (emphasis added):

There will be more Payton Gendrons (the Buffalo shooter–ed.) in the days to come, because the right-wing hate machine that profits off white fear and resentment of others will not stop cranking out their hatred for profit. And gullible poor and undereducated white people will continue to think that folks who look like I do are the root of all of their problems.

We are a failing state.

And we will continue to be a failing state as long as there are those among us who look away, look away, look away to Dixie Land.

Share

Originalist Sin 0

At the Bangor Daily News, Gordon Weil looks at the implications of Justice (sic) Alito’s draft abortion decision. He is not sanguine. A nugget:

Alito wrote that states did not allow abortion when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in 1868, so the court cannot rule that the amendment protects the right to abortion. In short, each part of the Constitution should be interpreted according to the conditions prevailing at the time it was adopted.

That’s constitutional originalism. That logic could raise the question of whether the Second Amendment right to own a gun, adopted in 1791, should be limited to protecting only muzzle-loader ownership.

If the only rights the federal government can protect are limited to those expressly listed in the Constitution and then only as they applied when the document was adopted, the U.S. would plunge headlong back to the late 1700s.

Share

The Republican Platform 0

PoliticalProf sums it up.

Share

A Notion of Immigrants 0

The Arizona Republic’s E. J. Montini dissects the deception behind the dog whistle (emphasis added).

The first time it (“replacement theory”–ed.) got any attention was when the supremacists rallying in Charlottesville, Va., in 2017 chanted, “Jews will not replace us.”

They were playing off a book published in France some years earlier claiming that Europe was being overrun by immigrants (in this case, Muslim and Black immigrants) under a plan by “elites” to replace native-born Europeans.

This ugly “replacement theory” was quickly picked up by nativists here and expanded to “you will not replace us.”

(snip)

Creating an honest and fair immigration system, and a secure border, is a sensible, necessary national policy. This isn’t that.

This is an attempt to use fear and deep-seeded insecurities to win elections. And it works.

Share

Indoctrination Nation 0

The Tampa Bay Times and the Miami Herald do the math.

Share

“Just Live with It” Is Not an Option 0

A law professor takes issue with Justice (sic) Clarence Thomas. Here’s how he opens his article; follow the link for the rest.

United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas has said, regarding those who protest the potential decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, that “We are becoming addicted to wanting particular outcomes, not living with the outcomes we don’t like.”

This is a remarkable statement.

By this same philosophy, we should chide those, who were unwilling to “live with” Dred Scott v. Sanford.

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

He was a mere twit. Now he’s a no account twit.

Share

Theocracy, Reprise 0

Methinks Michael in Norfolk identifies the original sin.

Share

As the Twig Is Bent . . . 0

. . . and, boy, are these twigs bent.

And you know very well they didn’t get that way all on their ownsome.

Share

Still Rising Again after All These Years 0

At the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Maureen Downey explores the effects of the state of Georgia’s war on historical fact. Here’s a bit:

The bills reveal the willingness of this Legislature and governor to exploit ginned-up fears of conservative white parents that schools are becoming woke boot camps where their kids learn about LGBTQ relationships, Black Lives Matter and white privilege.

It’s not a coincidence that the misinformation campaign that Georgia schools taught critical race theory followed the election of Georgia’s first Black and Jewish American senators, and as Confederate monuments fell across the country.

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

Professor Twit.

Share

The Marjorie Taylor Greene New Deal 0

Aside:

Farron missed the undercurrent. Let’s decode the code.

When right-wingers attack “welfare,” they are invoking the spirit and racist imagery of Ronald Reagan’s “welfare queen.” The word “welfare” has become yet another racist dog whistle.

Share

Still Rising Again after All These Years 0

Honest to Betsy, this is just mean for the sake of mean.

Share

What’s the Opposite of Woke? Asleep 0

At the Idaho State Journal, Chris Huston skewers the duplicity and under-lying bigotry of Florida’s “anti-woke” law. Here’s a bit;

Florida’s new law also makes illegal any statements in the classroom or employee training that people are oppressed (or privileged) based on their race, gender or national origin. This provision may make it tough for teachers to talk about the Civil War, unless you want to suggest that Black enslaved humans actually enjoyed their all-expenses paid cruise ship voyage to America to be sold on the auction block, thereby qualifying for a lifetime of free room and board, along with cool custom branding.

Share

A Notion of Immigrants, Reprise 0

Sam and his crew discuss the Republicans’ weaponization of anti-immigrant bigotry.

Share

Freedom of Screech 0

Murjani Rawls finds an irony in the right-wing’s celebration of Elon Musk’s promises to make Twitter a bastion of free speech screech.

Isn’t it ironic that speech should be allowed “to exist on a social media platform,’” when all over the country, Republican state legislators are banning race and slavery discussions in schools, books referring to LBGTQ and non-binary identifying people, and talk of what they deem “divisive concepts.”

More irony at the link.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.