From Pine View Farm

“That Conversation about Race” category archive

“Laboratories of Autocracy” 0

Sam talks with David Pepper about how Republicans craft their skills to gut out the vote.

Share

Decoding De (Color) Code 0

Gordon Weil translates.

Share

Plus Ca Change 0

At The Roanoke Times, Jeff E. Shapiro argues that, in Virginia, it’s 1885 all over again.

Share

The Merch 0

Title:  Trump Post-Presidency Merchandise.  Image:  A tee-shirt with a picture of a noose bearing the words,

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

The Politics of Moral (Pseudo) Panics 0

Thom wonders, “Who are they going after next?”

Share

Ipso Facto 0

The Arizona Republic’s E. J. Montini comments on a law progresssing through the Arizona legislature to ban teaching critical race theory in schools, where it is not taught. A snippet:

. . . as Victor Ray, a sociologist who works with the Brookings Institution, so succinctly points out, “Making laws outlawing critical race theory confirms the point that racism is embedded in the law.”

Share

Affirmation 0

At AL.com, Roy L. Johnson affirms the action.

That’s why I chuckle, at best, when the “affirmative action” is used as a weapon, when it is wielded to diminish or deflate.

More than once during my career I heard some form of this: “You’re really here because you’re Black.”

More than once did I respond: “And you’re really here because you’re white, so guess we’re even.”

Follow the link for the rest.

Share

A Tune for the Times 0

Share

Those Who Ignore History . . . . 0

At AL.com, Auburn professor Elena Aydarova, descendant of emigrants from soviet Russia, writes of the hazards of pretending that what happened didn’t happen. Here’s bit of her article (emphasis added); follow the link for the rest.

As someone born in the Soviet Union, I have followed debates about bans on the teaching of “divisive concepts,” such as “race” or “sex,” with trepidation.

My family bears the memory of what happens when states weaponize such types of teachings. My great grandfather was executed in the Soviet purges of the 1930s – a time when anyone who disagreed with the state dictums paid the ultimate price. Among those who lost their lives were teachers, educators, academics, and researchers. My family rarely discussed his story, but I learned one important lesson to share with the world – when governments decide to ban academic theories and concepts because they are deemed as “divisive” and “dangerous,” they undermine democracy and pave the way for authoritarianism.

Share

The Fire This Time 0

Nazi Cat, looking at a pile of burning books, asks,

Click to view the original image.

Share

Decoding De (Color) Code 2

Frame One:  Ronald Reagan says,

Kathryn Rubino runs the numbers.

Image via Job’s Anger.

Share

Thought Police, Redux 0

Heaven forbid that students should be exposed to ideas and facts while at school.

We are a society of stupid.

Share

Freedom of Screech 0

At Above the Law, Joe Patrice explains that one thing is not like the other thing. An excerpt; follow the link for more.

. . . it’s not the same thing. Banning Maus . . . is a government action raising all manner of thorny constitutional issues because governments are obligated to represent everyone while Neil Young is a private actor telling another private actor that it can no longer profit off of his property.

Share

All That Was Old Is New Again, Reprise 0

The Arizona Republic’s Laurie Roberts celebrates an honest Republican. A nugget:

Finally, we have a Republican legislator who is honest about the party’s intentions with the dozens upon dozens upon dozens of bills aimed at “reforming” our elections.

“We should have voting, in my opinion, in person, one day on paper, with no electronic means and hand counting that day,” he said, during a Wednesday hearing on an election bill. “We need to get back to 1958-style voting.”

Ah yes, 1958, the golden era for those of a certain hue. The good old days when we could use literacy tests and poll taxes to keep certain people (you know who you are) from having a vote.

More celebration at the link.

Share

All That Was Old Is New Again 0

Will Bunch looks at the current right-wing freak-out over book learnin’. A snippet:

This right-wing freak-out over what they claim is children becoming indoctrinated with ideas about racism or homophobia feels like a new McCarthyism. But when I spoke this week to Jonathan Friedman, director of free expression and education for the writers’ advocacy group PEN America, he said the pace of what his group calls “gag orders” against classroom instructors is the worst since the 1920s’ crusade against teaching evolution that climaxed with the infamous “Scopes Monkey Trial.” That trial took place in Tennessee just 28 miles west of where Maus was banned in the 2020s.

Image of the Pulitzer-prize winning book, Maus, caught in a mousetrap labeled

Image via Job’s Anger.

Share

Racism Supreme 0

Thom discusses today’s Republican Party’s embrace of racism as it relates to the recent vacancy on the Supreme Court.

Share

Thought Police 0

Michael in Norfolk discusses the right-wing’s war on thoughts. A snippet:

. . . Christofascists and the politicians who prostitute themselves to those who embrace ignorance and bigotry have been trying to ban any books and knowledge that challenge their primative beliefs from public schools and public libraries. Now, this forces have merged with racists – studies have shown the two overlap by wide margins – to push for a new round of book banning to prevent students and members of the public from learning accurate and truthful history and the common humanity of racial minorities and LGBT people.

Image of

Share

Still Rising Again . . . . 0

At the San Francisco Chronicle, Andrew Straus suggests that the United States could learn from how Germany deals with the legacy of Nazism and the Holocaust.

In the course of the discussion, he gets to the nub of the current fuss in the United States over critical race theory and “divisive concepts” (emphasis added):

The recent furor over teaching “critical race theory” in schools doesn’t stem from disagreements over how best to guide students through this history and its continued impact on contemporary American life. Rather, at the heart of the matter is a refusal to face the wrongs of the past and a desire to suppress discussion of whether Americans today have any obligation to rectify those wrongs.

I commend the entire piece to your attention.

Share

Conceptualizing Governor Trumpkin 0

Noting the Virginia’s new Republican governor wants to ban “divisive concepts” from public schools, Jim Marchman, writing at The Roanoke Times, wonders precisely what that term encompasses. For example:

. . . . what could be more “divisive” than high school sports programs where neighboring communities are driven to passionate rivalries as their teams struggle with each other on playing fields or arenas?

Afterthought:

Of course, Marchman purposely misses the point to make his point.

As Paul Krugman pointed out (see below), a “divisive concept” is nothing more than one which makes Governor Trumpkin and his dupes, symps, and fellow travelers feel uncomfortable.

Share

If You Don’t Talk about It, It Didn’t Happen 0

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.