From Pine View Farm

Politics of Hate category archive

Context 0

White football fan watching Colin Kaepernick take a knee during National Anthem to protest treatment of minorities says,


Click to see the image at its original location.

Share

“Facts Are What People Think” 0

Leonard Pitts, Jr., laments the passing of truth. A nugget:

“Why haven’t you reported that Colin Kaepernick’s actions are due to his radical Muslim beliefs? Why are you covering this up?”

So reads an email sitting in my inbox.

Not shockingly, Snopes, the fact-checking website, has rated the claim it makes as false. . . . .

That truth is not offered in hopes of persuading my correspondent. It is presented simply as a snapshot in time, a postcard from post-factual America. Meaning America of the last 20 years, where untruth is gospel, reality is multiple choice and “facts” are whatever you have testes enough to say and somebody is dumb enough to believe.

Read it. And weep.

Share

Deplorable Things Politicians Cannot Say 0

Charles Blow. A snippet:

What Clinton said was impolitic, but it was not incorrect. There are things a politician cannot say. Luckily, I’m not a politician.

Trump is a deplorable candidate – to put it charitably – and anyone who helps him advance his racial, religious and ethnic bigotry is part of that bigotry. Period. Anyone who elevates a sexist is part of that sexism. The same goes for xenophobia. You can’t conveniently separate yourself from the detestable part of him because you sense in him the promise of cultural or economic advantage. That hair cannot be split.

Share

Cataloging the Cavalcade of Lies 0

Keith Olbermann is back, and it’s about time.

Via Raw Story.

Share

Meet Donnie and the Deplorables 0

Excerpt:

Once you see the burning cross, and at that moment, you do not choose to leave, you are at a cross-burning.

Via Delaware Liberal.

Share

The Difference between “Remembrance” and “Remembering” 0

Jim Wright.

Read it.

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

Twits who laud tyranny.

Share

Drunk on Bircher Beer 0

Werner Herzog’s Bear details the resurgence of the Birchers.

Fun fact: The Koch Brothers come by it honestly. Their daddy was a big wheel in the John Birch Society.

Share

A Missive from a Mainer 0

You can’t make this stuff up.

Afterthought:

I never expected to see so much stuff I couldn’t make up as I’ve seen this year . . . .

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

The Chairman of the Board.

Via Atrios.

Share

Up against the Wall 0

Of course, if LePage wasn’t such a jerk, some other outcome would have been likely, however it might have been spun.

Share

Samuel Johnson Was Right 0

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel In related news, David Niose questions attempts to “instill” patriotism. A snippet:

Knowing that group loyalty is a natural human inclination, we should consider why certain sectors of American society are so obsessed with trying to “instill” patriotism in us. Lawmakers in Missouri, for example, enacted a new law last week requiring recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at least once each day in public schools. (Note the “at least” in that last sentence—as if mere once-a-day pledge recitation might be insufficient!) Missouri is following the cue of other states around the country, believing that government (and sometimes private institutions) must take affirmative steps to condition citizens, via a steady flow of patriotic exercises, into the mental state of national allegiance.

Such conditioning is neither necessary nor healthy, and as a society we should rethink it. Just ask Colin Kaepernick, the NFL player who unleashed a public outcry after respectfully dissenting from the national anthem. For doing nothing more than sitting out a ceremonial song at the start of a football game, Kaepernick has been called a traitor and worse. Or ask Bradford Campeau-Laurion, who was once ejected from Yankee Stadium for having the audacity to use the seventh-inning stretch to visit the men’s room rather than sing “God Bless America.” Such hostile responses to mild gestures of dissent show not a healthy patriotism but an aggressive, chauvinistic nationalism.

Share

Outreach 0

Title:  Minority Outreach.  Image:  Donald Trump in in tee-shirt wearing chains and baggy jeans to black couple in street who are shrinking away from him:  Yo, Crooked Hillary's a bigot, know what I'm sayin'.  Fist bump?

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Know Them by the Company They Keep 0

Share

If One Standard Is Good, Two Must Be Better 0

Frame One:  White Man Criticizes America:  Donald Trump says,


Click for the original image.

Share

Left Untaught 0

I never ran across this in any of my history classes.*

H/T to BadTux, who’s been on a roll this week.

___________________

*My degree is in history, with a focus on U. S. Southern. I did know that many persons thought that “America, the Beautiful” would have been a better choice, but I was unaware that “The Star-Spangled Banner” had a history of being sung at lynchings.

Share

A Kinder, Gentler Trump 0

Title:  Softening

In related news, Josh Marshall explains why Trump’s rhetoric is, by any measure, hate speech. A snippet:

But it’s (using specific ethnic slurs–ed.) not hate speech. Hate speech is rants meant to inflame, inspire fear or rage or violence against a particular class of people. The precise vocabulary is not the heart of the matter. There’s no question that what Trump’s Wednesday night speech was was hate speech, a tirade filled with yelling, a snarling voice, air chopped to bits with slashing hands and through it all a story of American victims helpless before a looming threat from dangerous, predatory outsiders.

Share

The Privatization Scam 0

BadTux has a theory.

If true, it is more disturbing than anything I’ve come up with, and, as my two or three regular readers know, I’m no Pollyanna. Even more disturbing in this time in which white supremacists feel free to let their filthy flag fly, it is too plausible for comfort.

I’m not saying I buy it, but I find the fact that it is plausible quite chilling.

Share

Take a Walk in the Park 0

Thom takes a serious look at Donald Trump’s rhetoric about crime (“It’s a war zone out there”), the actual crime rate (down significantly over the last 30 years), and the roots of crime. (You can skip the first two minutes–it’s recitation of Trump’s rhetoric. The facts start after that.)

Share

“I Trolled You So” 0

At Psychology Today Blogs, Joe Pierre reviews recent research revealing why anonymous internet comments are so wretched. A snippet (emphasis added):

(Psychologist John–ed.) Suler attributed the disinhibiting effects of online communication to several factors, most notably the ability to be anonymous (hiding our identity), invisible (not seeing nor being seen in face-to-face contact), and asynchronous (not interacting in real time). While Suler’s hypotheses were largely speculative at the time, subsequent research by Dr. Russell Haines and colleagues suggests that while anonymity does increase participation on online discourse, it does so across the board, without any specific or disproportionate benefit to shy people.2 The potential for anonymous online communication to have an “equalizing effect,” allowing shy people to speak up, was not supported in his experimental study. Instead, Haines found that anonymity “removes the accountability cues and frees members to express unpopular or socially undesirable arguments,” freeing reticent opinions as opposed to reticent people.2 In other words, the anonymity of online communication gives us the sense that it’s okay to speak our minds, sharing opinions that we’d more likely keep private – appropriately so – in face-to-face social interactions.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.