From Pine View Farm

Politics of Hate category archive

Flagging Interests: “History” and “Heritage”–Not the Same Thing 0

Brendan, who has some German ancestry, makes the point adeptly. A snippet:

I think if I was to “honor” my family’s heritage by flying a Nazi flag from my front porch, I’d be the neighborhood pariah. It wouldn’t matter a tinker’s damn what my pathetic excuses were: that flag would be seen, rightly, as the flag of race hatred and terrible violence that killed millions of innocent victims, not to mention the lives of the soldiers engaged on the battlefield. Why is the Confederate Army flag–which stands for treason, rebellion, the right to own and sell people, and the deaths of more Americans than in any other war we’ve been involved in–any different?

Do read it.

Share

All the News that Fits 0

Chauncey Devega considers the intersection between media and Dylan Roof.

Share

Southern-Fried Doublespeak and the “Land of Gracious Living,” Reprise 0

In the Bangor Daily News, a transplanted Virginian recounts what he was taught about the Civil War and how he realized it was a lie. His story sounds similar to mine, even though we grew up about as far apart from each other we could be and remain within the borders of the Commonwealth. Here’s the bit about his schooling; follow the link for the discovery of the lie.

Growing up in southwestern Virginia, the far corner of the state tucked deep into the Appalachian Mountains, we were never far from the shadows of the Civil War and its legacy.

The “Southern Cross,” as the flag is sometimes called, was portrayed as a symbol of independence and bravery in battle – “heritage, not hate” as the saying goes.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

We studied the Civil War in school, learned the names of the generals, visited the battlefields and the graves. The “Lost Cause” was ingrained in us early on. The mythology passed on.

Share

American Taliban 0

Share

Sowing the Wind 0

Werner Herzog’s Bear wonders whether the time has come for Republicans to reap the whirlwind they have conjured up. Here’s the opening of his post:

Back when the Tea Party winds stared blowing back in the early parts of this decade, I wondered whether the Republican Party had signed a devil’s bargain. It was encouraging the support of fringe elements that had long been outside of the mainstream of American politics, all in order to benefit politically from the rising feelings of resentment among white people.

One such example is the Republican eagerness to put the grievances of the “open carry” movement into law, as just recently happened in Texas. This is a movement that worships guns and views the Second Amendment as a protection against tyranny, as if the only thing standing between the status quo and a dictatorship is a bunch of dudes carrying AR-15’s into the local Chipotle. Voters who vote on gun issues tend to be highly motivated, so the Republicans are willing to break bread with armed vigilantes if it means electoral success.

Follow the link for more. After you read it, you will likely conclude, as did I, that Mr. Bear is an optimist.

Share

In Aurum Veritas 0

Dick Polman follows the money. A snippet:

There’s an old saying in politics: If you lay down with dogs, you get up with fleas. And there’s no better illustration than the longstanding ties between the contemporary southern-based GOP and the white extremist group known as the Council of Conservative Citizens.

This is the group that runs the website that educated Dylann Roof in the ways of racial hatred; we know this because Roof reputedly said so in an online manifesto. He educated himself with some bogus crime stats on the CCC site – about how blacks supposedly kill whites in droves – and he wrote, “I have never been the same since that day.” In all likelhood, he also noticed the CCC’s so-called statement of principles, which opposes “all efforts to mix the races of mankind.”

And now it turns out that, since 2011, group president Earl Holt III has donated lavishly and exclusively to Republican candidates: Ted Cruz, Scott Walker, Rand Paul, Rick Santorum. Plus a slew of Republican House and Senate candidates: Michele Bachmann, Tom Cotton, Joni Ernst, Thom Tillis, Mark Sanford, and Chris McDaniel. Plus a slew of conservative PACs on the Republican right.

Back in the olden days, when I was a young ‘un, it was the White Citizens Councils. That was where the respectable racists, the ones who didn’t (admit to) wearing sheets, hung out.

The names change, but the bigotry remains.

As an aside, this is the perverse outcome of Nixon’s odious Southern Strategy. Nixon hoped to harness Southern racism to maintain a Republican majority, but the Southern strategy went out of control, as appeals to hatred and bigotry are wont to do.

Racism is now the user; the Republican Party is the tool.

Share

Buyer Beware 0

Content warning labels:  skill and crossbones, hazmat symbol,
Click for the original image.

Share

Southern-Fried Doublespeak and the “Land of Gracious Living” 2

At Talking Points Memo, Tony Horwitz explains how the South lost the war and won the peace. If you have not yet figured out that the South of Gone with the Wind is a lie and a fraud, it might be a good place for you to start. Here’s a bit.

It would take a book to explain the history behind this belief, and some excellent ones have been written (to name one, David Blight’s Race and Reunion). The very short version is that white Southerners lost the war but won its aftermath and the battle for how the conflict would be remembered. Violent Southern intransigence and Northern war-weariness killed Reconstruction; the nation chose regional reconciliation over racial justice; and ex-Confederates constructed a potent ideology—the Lost Cause—that romanticized plantation life and cast the war as a noble, doomed defense of Southern freedom and an agrarian way of life.

In the 20th century, mass culture and commerce spread the Lost Cause nationwide, most notably in movies like Birth of a Nation and Gone With the Wind. The moonlight-and-magnolia virus grew so strong that the U.S. Senate approved the construction of a Mammy monument in Washington in the 1920s, and after World War II the rebel flag became a faddish adornment on vehicles, beach towels and other products, a generalized emblem of independence, Southernness or good ol’ boyism.

Here’s a tidbit: the presence of the Stars and Bars on the South Carolina Capitol grounds has nothing to do with tradition. It was placed there in 1961, reputably in recognition of the Civil War Centennial, and retained there in defiance the Civil Rights movement.

The Confederate battle ensign was the darling of racists and symbol of racism then, it is so now, and it will be so forever.

Share

Misdirection Play, Haters Gotta Hate Dept. 0

Share

Stray Thought 0

No right-wing Bible-thumper will think to suggest from Sunday’s pulpit that the flooding of Texas may be a sign from the Almighty that the climates they are a-changing.

Not a single one.

Read more »

Share

Right-Wing Race Bait-and-Switch 0

Right wing talking point #4,747:  How to spot a

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

A Picture Is Worth 0

Know them by the company they keep.

Read more »

Share

When All You Have Is a Hammer . . . 0

What Ta-Nehisi Coates said.

Share

Jonesing for Conspiracies 0

Share

Self-Fulfilling Prophecies 0

Man pokes at rattlesnake.  Nothing.  Keeps poking.  Finally snake rears up and man shoots it.  Man says,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

The Creative Process 0

The inventiveness of those who would dress bigotry in Sunday go-to-meeting clothes is most impressive.

Share

Merchant of Hate 0

Via TPM.

Share

“Do unto Others . . . .” 4

Jesus at the Sermon on the Mount:  Love thy neighbor as thyself.  Onlooker:  Sorry, that unfairly burdens the religious freedom of us Indiana residents.

In related news, Little Ricky Derides again.

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Tipping Point? 0

Josh Marshall thinks that the reaction to Indiana’s recent law permitting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is qualitatively different from what’s happened in the past and that Indiana’s bigots did not anticipate it. A snippet:

Don’t we go through this story almost every year in which some red or reddish state pushes through some anti-gay rights law? This happens every year like spring follows winter. But this time something is different. Yes, there have been boycotts before. In Indiana itself, business groups wary of bad publicity and boycotts played a role in beating back another effort to ban same sex marriages. But here you have a flood of proactive statements by different companies saying they’ll shun the state. That seems to have created something of a rush to the exits (or entrances?) with various organizations which a few years ago likely wouldn’t have touched this kind of controversy signing themselves up for the effort.

Now Gov. Pence is reduced to lamely complaining that his and the legislatures efforts have been misunderstood or distorted. “I just can’t account for the hostility that’s been directed at our state,” Pence told the Indianapolis Star. “I’ve been taken aback by the mischaracterizations from outside the state of Indiana about what is in this bill.” He can’t even manage the standard, conservatives in my state are being victimized by the axis of gays and liberals. He seems genuinely surprised.

Share

The Blame Game 0

Steven M. is keeping score.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.