Politics of Hate category archive
Welfare Cowboys 4
Pap and Robert Kennedy, Jr., discuss Mili(tant) the Moocher.
Part 1: The history.
Part 2: The Moocher.
Aside:
Pap makes an error of fact in Part Two. It was the Philadelphia Police, not the Feds, that tried to bomb the MOVE house. I lived in the Philadelphia suburbs at the time and could see the smoke from my bedroom window. Also, MOVE was a quite an oddball outfit, more apocalyptic cult than anything else,* and extremely annoying to their neighbors, who wanted them to go away.
The Gloomy Historian offers an additional perspective; there’s an excerpt below the fold:
“Suffer the Children” 0
It’s the new Republican rage.
I am confident that racism and the implicit assumption that mostly little black kids benefit from free school lunches underlie this. Once again, Republicans play to their racist base.
The Secesh 0
Still fighting–and lying–after all these years.
Moved below the fold because it autoplays on some systems.
Autoplaying is rude.
The Nugget of Nugent 0
Dick Polman thinks he knows why Republicans keep Ted Nugent around.
So why do Republicans – like Mitt Romney in 2012 – abide this guy in the first place? . . . .
But the thing is, Republicans don’t view Nugent as a mistake. They think he’s useful, that he serves a purpose, that right-wing politicians like Abbot can parade him with cynical intent.
Nugent is viscerally in touch with the haters in The Base – and the haters tend to vote heavily, especially in Republican primaries (Abbot’s first task is to win his March 4 primary). Nugent can travel the low road and say all the vile stuff that the politicians aren’t free to say. And after the haters guzzle Nugent’s red meat, the politicians play tut-tut on the high road. What a deal: Nugent does the dirty work while they keep their hands clean.
In other words, because hate sells, and hate is what they got.
More at the link.
Facebook Frolics 0
In Alabama, wingnuts have discovered how to spot RINOs–by their Facebook friends.
Twits on Twitter 0
An apparently inexhaustible supply of racist twits.
Decoding de Code 0
The societal meanings of words often differ from the dictionary meanings. My South Carolina grandmother used to refer to black folks as “darkies” so as not to remind them that they were “colored.” Never in her life could she bring herself to refer to them as “black.” It was not proper. (Other, less polite words, I never heard from her.)
Leonard Pitts, Jr., explores the imagery around words and their social meanings in the context of the trial of Michael Dunn, a white man who stood his ground against shot an unarmed black kid because he didn’t like the “thug” music the kid was playing. A nugget:
The nugget continues below the fold, but, before you read it, try his little exercise.
“If You Call Them, They Will Come” 1
Republican dog whistle politics and the destruction of the middle class:
Via C&L, which also links to the transcript.
The New Secesh: Bunker Mentality 0
Yes, it’s crazy. Crazy is dangerous.
In addition to loads of guns, ammo, and a shooting range, there was a bunch of Nazi paraphernalia. Nevertheless, according to one of the residents, “It’s a workshop. It’s not a bomb shelter,” which leads to the question, “Just what are you working on?”
Republican Family Values 0
In the context of a post about Chris Christie and the George Washington Bridge closing, Shaun Mullen has a wonder (follow the link for the rest):
Why do so many Republican officials today use their power to hurt people?
I think the answer is simple.
I have said here many times that the Republican Party has devolved into the party of mean for the sake of mean. For some folks, being mean is fun. They are called “sadists.”
Sadism: a Republican Family Value.
Twits on Twitter 0
Twits who put the “nut” in wingnut.
I’m a Southern Boy 0
I know bigotry when I see it.
I grew up surrounded by it and I’m too old to have patience with it any more.
The Booman is a Yankee boy. He also knows bigotry when he sees it.
Hate is hate, regardless of the fancy words with which some would try to cloak it.
The Party of Random Offensiveness 0
This is little more than being nasty just for the sake of being nasty and cornering the nastiness vote.
Walker’s action rewrites a 2010 law — the first of its kind in the nation — that made it extremely difficult for schools to keep their Indian team names if they had complaints filed against them.
Tribes fought the effort to scale back that law and had urged Walker to veto it.
Nastiness: A Republican family value.









