From Pine View Farm

Politics of Hate category archive

Memories of Apartheid 0

I have mentioned earlier that, when I was young, white Southerners looked to South Africa as a beacon of sympathy.

Read Dan Simpson’s memories of serving in South Africa.

And weep, for, though they dress it up in fancy language, this is the vision of the New Secesh.

Share

The Secesh 1

Out Harper’s Ferry way, a new rebellion is taking shape.

“In Maryland, we have a number of irreconcilable differences with the state government and how they govern,” he said.

The laundry list of grievances that underpins the Liberate Western Maryland movement runs from higher taxes on alcohol and cigarettes to “oppressive” gun control legislation, in-state college tuition for illegal immigrants, and even stricter rules on septic tanks.

Several hundred people had signed a petition backing the statehood movement by the time Strzelcyzk and a handful of supporters presented their vision to about 80 people who attended the rally at Allegany College in Cumberland.

Also, the rest of Maryland is full of the blahs.

They certainly won’t talk about it, of course, but, if racism isn’t a big undercurrent in this, I’m not a southern boy.

Share

Bad Fence, Bad Neighbor 0

The bad neighbor: why, the one who built the fence, of course!

Share

Republican Jesus 0

The teachings of Republican St. Paul Ryan:

Via Escape from Whitemanistan. Follow the link for commentary.

Share

“I’m Not Racist, but . . . .” 0

. . . almost always means, “I’m racist, and . . . .”

Video moved below the fold because autoplays on some systems.

Dammit.

Read more »

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

Entitled twits.

Share

The Secesh 0

Via Raw Story.

Share

The Secesh 0

You realize, of course, that these people are nuts, and dangerous nuts at that.

Share

The Secesh 0

Harold Meyerson nails teabaggery. The nugget (emphasis added):

Today’s tea party-ized Republicans speak less for Wall Street or Main Street than they do for the seething resentments of white Southern backwaters and their geographically widespread but ideologically uniform ilk. Their theory of government, to the extent that they have one, derives from John C. Calhoun’s doctrine of nullification — that states in general and white minorities in particular should have the right to overturn federal law and impede majority rule. Like their predecessors in the Jim Crow South, today’s Republicans favor restricting minority voting rights if that is necessary to ensure victory at the polls.

Share

The Secesh 0

Out in the New River Valley, the Roanoke Times is hosting a duel between the secesh and the sane.

Indeed, Godwin’s Law has come into play.

Here’s a snippet from a column by Halford Ryan in response to an exercise in Confederate revisionism by John C. Cahoon (that’s right, “Cahoon,” not “Calhoun”):

But Cahoon’s most troubling claim is his attempt to rationalize the Civil War. “Like the Vietnam veteran, the Confederate soldier did his duty as he understood it to be in his era . . . all deserve to be honored by us irrespective of what we today think of their wars or the governments that asked them to fight.” Surely, the ends for which soldiers fought must be considered. Go figure why Germans do not celebrate Nazi History Month or the Nazi heritage of hearth and home.

Share

How the Tea Was Bagged 0

Reg Henry follows the trail of teas. A nugget:

The Tea Party was a strange phenomenon from the start. It began no later than February 2009, apparently sparked by the efforts to stimulate and shore up the economy left moribund by the previous administration. This, of course, was an outrage to some. How dare anybody rebuff the iron will of the market for the general welfare!

President Barack Obama had been in office one month — one month! — yet already he was considered a socialist/Marxist. Most presidents get a political honeymoon — Mr. Obama wasn’t given enough time to find the White House bathroom. But thank goodness his race was not a factor, and if you believe that, pull my leg, it’s got a bell on it.

The other day, we grabbed lunch at a beachfront eatery; it was mid-afternoon, the season is waning, and business was slow, so we had a pleasant chat with the only waitress on duty, who looked to be college age.

She mentioned that, based on the attitudes of some of her customers, she thought that persons are more bigoted and prejudiced than they used to be.

I disagreed, but I did say that, as far as I can tell, compared to a couple of decades ago, persons sure are a damned sight more willing to be open about their bigotry than they were a couple of decades ago.

Teabaggery is exhibit A-one.

Share

Base Assumptions 0

Excerpt, about the Republican “base”:

There’s the corporate shills, there’s the religious fanatics and then there are the ‘freedom’ fiends, the one that want to make sure that you have the right to sleep under a bridge.

Via Raw Story.

Share

Twits on Twitter 6

In a follow-up to the previous post, twits with tea crackers.

Share

Just What It’s Crackered Up To Be 0

Chauncey Devega, in a typically long and tightly reasoned post (I almost always say that, because his posts almost always are), exposes the recipe for Tea(bag) Crackers(TM).

A nugget:

The disruptive political behavior by the Tea Party is also a direct function of how the Republican Party is the country’s de facto “White” political interest group–and how the Tea Party, its most extreme element, functions as a White Identity organization.

Obama has been the focus of repeated efforts by the Right to delegitimize his presidency. Most of these are fundamentally rooted in a deep anxiety about his race. In all, a black man is incompatible with the “real America” that the Tea Party and neo-Confederate Republican Party yearns for. Obama’s personhood, and all of the history and weight that comes with it, is outside of the boundaries of what it means to be “American” for the White Right, their allies, and many in Red State America.

Share

Mapping the Secesh 2

Map showing location of districts of House members who demanded legistion to defund Obama care of else.


Click for a larger image.

Via C&L.

Share

Night of the Long Knives 0

Chauncey Devega unloads on Republican efforts to destroy the food stamp program.

Here’s a snippet:

Last week, Republicans in the House of Representatives voted to cut 39 billion dollars from federal food assistance programs. Their vote is more than just the next act in the ongoing politics of cruelty by the Republican Party in the Age of Obama.

It is a decision to kill poor people.

In America, discussions of poverty are linked in the public imagination to stereotypes about race, class, and gender. The face of poverty is not white (the group which in fact comprises the largest group of recipients for government aid). Instead, it is the mythical black welfare queen, or an “illegal” immigrant who is trying to pilfer the system at the expense of “hard working” white Americans.

Discussions about poverty are also easily transformed into claims about morality and virtue. Consequently, while the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is very efficient and involves very little if any fraud on the part of its participants, stereotypes about the poor can be used to legitimate the policing and harassment of Americans in need of food support through mandatory drug testing and other unnecessary programs.

Here, the long-term end goal for Republicans is revealed for what it is—a desire to make being a poor person into a crime.

He’s quite correct, you know. The Republican positions on helping the poor cannot be separated from their decision, at the time Nixon initiated the odious Southern Strategy, to become the new Confederate Party. Witness this comparison of the Eisenhower platform with the Romney platform.

Do please read the rest.

Share

Dis Coarse Discourse 0

Picture the God Squad.

Share

Hunger Gamers 0

Republicans vote to kick poor folks off food stamps.

Elsewhere, E. J. Dionne comments on the logic of these tactics. A nugget:

There is a thread running through the antics of kamikaze caucus. Almost everything they are doing is designed to keep government from acting against inequality and addressing the stagnation or decline of incomes among both poor and middle-class Americans.

These are not nice people.

Share

The Secesh, Zombie Apocalypse Dept. 0

Determined to be where they are not wanted.

The North Dakota town of Leith, population 24, has established a legal defense fund to resist being taken over by white supremacists, the Bismark Tribune reported Thursday.

Craig Cobb, 61, purchased a dozen plots of land in Leith (pronounced ‘Leeth’) and plans to turn it into a colony for white supremacists, the Bismark Tribune reported last month. He has already sold or transferred ownership of some plots to people who share his white nationalist beliefs, and advertised the town as a place where “responsible hard core” white nationalists can fly “racialist” banners, the New York Times reported.

Read the story from the Bismark Tribune.

Visit the town’s nascent website.

Share

Water over the Damned 0

As I said once, I’m not a big Al Sharpton fan, but, as my old boss used to say, even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.