From Pine View Farm

April, 2009 archive

Twits on Twitter: The Twitter Revolution 0

Well, maybe not so much. On the Media reports:

When 10,000 Moldovans filled the streets in protest last week, it was characterized as the ‘Twitter revolution.’ But now that the dust has cleared, what role did Twitter really play? And was it a revolution? Ethan Zuckerman, a fellow at Harvard’s Berkman Center for Internet and Society, tells the tale of the tweets.

Follow the link to read the transcript or listen here:

Share

The Entitlement Society 0

These people live in another world:

Portfolio ran an anonymous piece today by a self-described TARP wife lamenting how far she’s fallen both socially and monetarily. . . . What’s always astonishing about these Wall Street “look how much worse my life is” pieces is that they’re written with the belief that people, besides their friends at the country club, will have any sympathy for them whatsoever.

Share

Armstrong 0

Share

Bye-Bye Bybee 0

Sign the petition here.

Via Atrios.

Share

Off to Drink Liberally 0

Cheers.

Share

Tead Off 0

An hordette in search of an enemy. Terry Mancour sips tea parties in the Guardian:

So what did motivate (the teabaggers)? Mostly hatred for Barack Obama, pure and simple. The American public rejected them and their failed policies. Blaming him for the profound self-pity that arises out of getting your arse royally kicked in an election was a factor. They held signs insisting that Obama was simultaneously a socialist and a fascist, a radical Muslim and a radical black Christian, a hopeless incompetent and an evil genius.

These accusations were designed to incite strong feelings, even hatred, among the conservative base. Open calls for secession in Texas and repeated calls for “revolution” (even though we just had a well-attended, well-executed election cycle) from policies that hadn’t even had time to take effect yet across the board were noteworthy. Plenty of teabaggers were proudly discussing their second amendment-protected personal armories and their willingness to use them, should real revolution come. Against whom, they couldn’t really say.

And there’s that black guy in the White House, and that’s just so foreign to their sensibilities that it all has to be a plot, a conspiracy, a secret plan by unseen forces working through “that negro” (one actually said that to me) to enslave the good hard-working American white folk and take away their freedoms to go to church and own guns and get married and not pay taxes – despite any real evidence to back that claim up. Indeed, some cite the very lack of evidence as proof of the conspiracy.

But after you scrape away the billionaires who founded and funded this “grassroots effort”, subtract the large number of liberal observers and amused media people, take away the faked-his-birth-certificate conspiracy crowd, remove the whacky costume-clad exhibitionists and the right-to-life-and-ammunition culture warriors, and I think you’ll find that most of the teabaggers were just pissed-off, middle-class white people who got screwed in the economic downturn and are looking for someone to be angry at.

Walter Brasch has more commentary at ASZ:

But, these protesting masses aren’t the rich, and they aren’t being forced to give up more of their income. In fact, the Obama tax cuts benefit about 95 percent of all Americans.

The idea of a Tea Party was probably that of CNBC commentator Rick Santelli, who ranted against any government assistance for persons who lost their homes through foreclosure. Pushing the tea bagging of America were Fox mouths Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Glenn Beck, and dozens of other conservative talking mouths who are among the top 5 percent, and whose seven-figure incomes would be reduced under the Obama plan to restore fiscal sanity to America.

Well, I guess it’s true. Americans really are revolting.

Share

When Zombie Banks Walked the Earth 0

Dean Baker in The Guardian:

This backdrop in extremely important in assessing the “fix the banks” battle cry of the economists who did not see the housing bubble. The word from this distinguished group is that if we can get the banks lending again, then the economy will be on its way to recovery. Coincidentally, the central ingredient in their formula is throwing hundreds of billions, or even trillions, of taxpayer dollars at the banks. In other words, they want to impose huge taxes on ordinary workers to give more money to the people who were most directly responsible for the propelling the bubble.

The elite economists tell us that even if this idea might offend our sensibilities, it is the only way to get the economy going again. This is where a little basic economics would be useful again.

(snip)

In other words, the arithmetic shows that a bank fix, while desirable, cannot possibly be sufficient to offset the collapse of the housing bubble. If our priority is to save the bankers from suffering the consequences of their own mistakes, then it makes sense to throw all our money at them. But if the point is to fix the economy, then we have to look elsewhere.

Those of us who know economics recognise this fact. Those who insist on the bank-fix route should be asked one simple question: “When did you stop being wrong about the economy?”

Share

Home from Fantasy Land 2

Of course, facts never stopped a Republican before. Dick Polman analyzes Rick Perry’s secessionist fantasies.

The fact is, Texas can’t secede even if it wanted to. In the 1845 language that brought Texas into the union, there isn’t a single word about any secession option. One might also suggest that the secession issue was settled forever in 1865, after 600,000 American soldiers lost their lives fighting over it. The bottom line, however, is that the U.S. Supreme Court settled it in an 1869 ruling…which means that the so-called Texas secession option has been judicially dead for the last 140 years.

From the decision in Texas v. White: “When, therefore, Texas became one of the United States, she entered into an indissoluble relation. All the obligations of perpetual union, and all the guaranties of republican government in the Union, attached at once to the State. The act which consummated her admission into the Union was something more than a compact; it was the incorporation of a new member into the political body. And it was final. The union between Texas and the other States was as complete, as perpetual, and as indissoluble as the union between the original States.”

The current Texas governor, we can assume, isn’t really as dense about Texas history as he appears. This was all just a calculated bid to gin up the GOP extremists (for political reasons that I will mention shortly). His calculation is actually easy to spot. Because while Perry purports to be outraged by big government in Washington – last week he called it “oppressive” and condemned its “interference with the affairs of our state” – in reality he is in constant pursuit of big government’s bucks. And whenever he brings that “oppressive” money home to Texas, he brags about it.

Share

The Entitlement Society, Reprise 0

The Philadelphia Shrinquirer on rising credit card fees:

Credit-card companies say they need to raise fees and interest rates, even on good customers, to recoup some of their losses from bad loans. But this is punishing customers who are not bad risks. And it comes at a time when money is especially cheap for banks, which can borrow from the Federal Reserve at virtually no cost.

In other words, the credit card companies say that they are entitled to the money because, well, they are entitled to the money.

Share

The Entitlement Society 0

They weren’t there. They had nothing to do with it. They didn’t see anything.

And they think the world owes them their houses in the Hamptons, just because, well, because.

To Wall Street people who have grown up in the bubble, the meaning of the crisis is only slowly sinking in. They can’t yet grasp the idea of a life lived on less. “Without exception, Wall Street guys have gotten accustomed to not being stuck in the city in August. So it becomes a right to have a summer home within an hour or two commute from Manhattan,” says the Goldman vet. “There’s a cost structure of going with your family on summer vacation that’s not optional. There’s a cost structure of spending $40,000 to send your kids to private school that is not optional. There’s a sense of entitlement, that you need that amount of money just to live, that’s not optional.”

It you really really like self-pity pr0n, follow the link and read the whole thing.

Via the Democratic Daily.

Share

Stray Thought 0

You can’t control the deal.

You can only play the cards.

Share

Running Out of Names To Call 0

Republicans face “ism” shortage.

Delaware Liberal runs down the list.

Addendum: As of this morning, their site is down for maintenance and following the link gets a 404. Try again later.

Share

Must Be That Pesky UAW Again 0

Toyota Motor Corp.’s production in Japan for fiscal 2009 will likely drop below the 3 million unit level for the first time in 31 years, the Yomiuri Shimbun reported Tuesday, citing unnamed sources.

Toyota’s domestic output would fall to about 2.8 million units, marking a decline of more than 30% from the company’s peak production in fiscal 2007, the report said.

What’s that you say?

There’s no UAW in Japan. Or at Toyota?

But the Republicans tell us it’s all the UAW’s fault. What’s with that?

Share

Weekly Address 0

John Cole has commentary.

Share

Goodman and Krupa 0

This, by the way, is my ringtone of choice, except for three special persons who get their own ringtones. (They are not all special for the same reasons.)

Share

A. Peanuts, Walnuts, Chestnuts, Wingnuts 0

Q. Name one dishonest and three honest breeds of nuts.

Via Delaware Watch.

Share

Blue Genes 0

A potential new field for all those unemployed lawyers and soon-to-graduate law students and science students out there. From Scientific Blogging:

It is said that people go into psychology to understand themselves…well, one of my main reasons why I went into genetics was to prove that I was not related to my family. That, of course, didn’t happen – The Addams Family is a more functional collection of misfits than my assortment of relatives, but now I may have a second option. Maybe I can sue my parents for the genetic material that they gave me.

Does it sound like I just took a break from reality? Maybe…but in today’s world anything may be possible. A recent case in New York State may have set the stage for me to actually proceed with my lawsuit.

Share

How To Waste Money and Bankrupt What Used To Be a Great Paper 0

Steve has the skinny.

Aside: I could live on $3500.00 a month. And often have.

Share

They Have It sdrawkcaB 0

Newt Gingrich claims that the Obama administration is “secular and nonreligious.”

The last time I looked, this was not a theocracy, despite the wingnuts’ attempts to turn it into one.

Jack Cluth gets it frontwards (Aside: It somehow seems fitting that I stumbled over this while sitting in my church’s office doing treasurer stuff):

Gingrich is seeking to burnish his politcal apple by playing and age-old Republican game. If you can’t win over your base with the force of your ideas…well, then find someone you can convince people to hate. It’s not quite “divide and conquer”, but it certainly is “demonize and conquer”. When people begin to hate, they cease thinking, and a charismatic leader can manipulate the intellectually stunted to their own advantage. This is the very definition and arc of Newt Ginrich’s career.

(snip)

Too bad that the Religious Right is less concerned with hypocritical Right-wingers willing to milk Christianity to every ounce of advantage they can gain than with the “evils” of a Democrat occupying the White House.

Stop using the God of Love to foster the politics of hate.

Share

Drinking Liberally 2

Tuesday, Triumph Brewing Company, Chestnut within sight of Penn’s Landing if it weren’t for the Chinese Wall of I-95, 6 p.

Good food, good talk, good company.

Hold a stool for me. If the creeks don’t rise, I’ll be there.

Share