From Pine View Farm

Culture Warriors category archive

Biblical Literalism 0

Roy Moore points at stone tablet that says,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

An Audience of One 0

Juanita Jean does the math.

Share

Art Imitates Life Imitates Art Imitates Life . . . 0

Little girl starting off on bicycle ride.  Mother says,

If you want to understand how Roy Moore and others of his ilk are able to hold on to power and status, there may be no better place to start than chapter 19 of The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, in which “the Duke and the Dauphin” are introduced to the narrative.

Image via Job’s Anger.

Aside:

If you have not read Mark Twain’s masterpiece, do so.

Many Southerners haven’t changed much since it was written.

Share

No Ifs, Ands, or Buts 0

Dana Goetsch explores the craven, lick-spittle world of the “No Apology Apology.”

Share

On Keeping One’s Hands to Oneself 0

The Baltimore Sun’s Tricia Bishop points out the sexual misconduct can be anywhere, as it knows no party, no industry, no social strata, no political or religious affiliation. She offers some advice for men befuddled as to what constitutes acceptable behavior. Here’s the gist:

Appropriate behavior seems a hard lesson for many men to learn, for reasons my female brain cannot fathom. As I’m in a helpful mood, let me break it down in very simple terms. Just as you shouldn’t say every little thing that pops into your head, you shouldn’t act on every little sexual urge that pops into your pants.

Share

Hoist on the Elmer Gantry 0

Man and woman walking past newspaper box displaying the headline,

Click to see the image at its original location.

Share

“In the Biblical Way” 0

Title:  Crawling Out from under Roy Moore's Rock.  Image:  Republican Elephants trapped under giant Ten Commandments statue, variously saying,

Click for the original image.

Dick Polman has more on the Republican Party’s perverse response to purported perversion. A nugget:

But the problem is that the GOP, which once prided itself as the party of high moral character, keeps sinking lower. And the GOP is a fractious party, evidenced anew by its clashing responses to the Moore story. While most senators have embraced the “if true” talking point (which gives Moore plenty of wiggle room to deny and dig in), the Alabama branch of the GOP is basically saying that even if Moore did do what he says he didn’t do, that would be just fine with them.

Why? Because they say the Bible says so.

Follow the link for Polman’s analysis of the Republican Party’s novel interpretation of the scriptures.

Share

Escape Clause 0

Elie Mystal reports. A snippet:

Get out of Jail free cardNo matter how many people are “outed” for their sexual misconduct (Louie CK, Mark Halperin, Donald Trump) there are people who resist the notion that this behavior is somehow authorized. There are people who refuse to accept that we have erected a system and society designed to allow men to victimize women they meet, and then protect those men from their accusers.

This week, we have as close as we’re going to get to contractual evidence that sexual harassment and assault is both contemplated and condoned when powerful men are involved.

Follow the link for Exhibit A.

Share

A Matter of Lives 0

Writing in The Charlotte Observer, Tiffany Capers describes her own first #metoo moment, then moves a new topic to the discussion. Here’s an excerpt, in which she highlights some hypocrisy.

As a black woman, I don’t get to choose which aspect of my identity matters more. If I were to declare “Women’s lives matter,” your rebuttal probably wouldn’t be “No, all lives matter.” After all, I am a woman with #metoo stories. But if I say “Black lives matter,” some who believe my life matters as a woman don’t believe my life matters because I’m black.

Do please read the rest.

Share

Predators on the Prowl 0

Jessica Valenti suggests that predatory behavior, far from being penalized, is too often rewarded. A snippet:

Perhaps it’s time to consider that abusive men aren’t rising to the top in spite of their disdain for women, but because of it. In a country where domineering bravado and casual misogyny can land a man in the White House, it’s not unreasonable to believe that this kind of behavior in men not only goes unpunished – but that it’s actively rewarded.

For too long, we’ve lauded men’s domination and aggressiveness as a sign of leadership rather than possible red flags. When men talk over everyone else in a room, we call it confidence rather than entitlement. If they berate others in meetings, we call them powerful and passionate, not bullying. And when they treat women at work differently than they do men, we’re told that they’re not sexist – they’re just “old-school.”

Share

The Court Is in Session 0

Elie Mystal suggests–well, to be precise, states outright–that Attorney-General Jeff Sessions is a “zealous theocrat.”

Methinks he has a point.

Share

How Stuff Works, Dominance and Desire Dept. 0

I must say that, in none of the places I’ve worked–and by that I mean my own little corner of the company, not the company as a whole–have I heard of, let along witnessed, predatory sexual behavior such as that recently in the news.

Nonetheless, the recent news stories in no way surprise me.

I know that such conduct went on in parts of at least one company I worked for. It was early in my career, which started just as the Mad Men days were coming to a close. As one of my co-workers told me at the time, “No woman wants to be in the elevator with [Vice President X]. He thinks every woman in [Department Y] is a member of his harem.” I also recall that, when an accomplished and diligent woman in my department received a promotion, it was accompanied by a whispering campaign that she had “slept her way” into it (she didn’t).

Historiann argues that there much more going on workplaces which tolerate such behavior than sexual hanky-panky. Here’s a bit of her piece; follow the link for the rest.

This is the playbook for sexualizing people and workplaces as a part of the process of marginalizing and alienating the junior folks who get caught up in these relationships, whether they’re consensual or not. This is also a primary means by which men re-create the hierarchy of men over women, again and again. Exploiting younger women (which is the overwhelming majority of sexual harassment and abuse cases) is a win-win for these guys, because they can get their rocks off, and–here’s the beauty part–you keep junior women from becoming senior women who might step on your nuts about all this because you’ve created an sexualized environment in which the junior women must either become victims or collaborators. Most of them will quit eventually, and the ones that hang on are compromised because they’ve been drawn in as collaborators (or heck, even apologists for the abuse of younger women.)

Share

Suffer the Children 0

Mike wonders why Republicans and their vocally self-proclained “Christian” supporters are willing to condemn children to sickness and death through their failure to renew CHIP. (Warning: Language.)

Share

Hat Trick 0

Share

Suffer the Children 0

It’s not scripture. It’s policy.

Share

Real Big Men 0

Alfred Doblin muses on the state of “manhood” (whatever that is) and concludes that it has been Trumpled.

A snippet:

Too many men believe the art of the deal is more important than the actual deal itself. Getting away with it is not an accomplishment worthy of praise. It is not manly in the least.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Hijab hijinks.

Share

Hazardous Duty 0

Woman to man:  In my previous job, I always carried mace and a stun gun.  Man:  Were you in law enforcement?  Woman:  No, I worked for Fox.class=”aligncenter” width=”500px” height=”373px”

Share

“Think of the Bakeries” 0

Redacted Tonight discusses how the religious right is attempting to leverage the recent hurricanes so it can suckle at the public teat.

Warning: Language.

Share

Whinestein 0

Also at the Inky, Will Bunch excoriates Harvey Weinstein’s farcical attempt to attribute his predations on the 1960s. A snippet:

In Hollywood, the phrase “the casting couch” — the sexual scam that Weinstein updated — originated in the 1910s, making that sick tradition essentially as old as the movie studios themselves. And if “Weinsteinism” is some kind of warped offshoot of 20th century liberalism, how to explain the abuses by conservative heroes such as O’Reilly or his boss, the late Roger Ailes?

The biggest difference in sexual abuse — by family members, “trusted” adults, bosses, or the otherwise powerful — before the arrival of the 1960s and ’70s was that victims were more likely to suffer in silence, increasing their trauma. As for those changing “rules” that Weinstein clings to as his excuse, the only real rule changes that mattered that came from the early 1970s were the ideas that women had a right to more freedom, more respect and greater opportunity in the workplace and in every other social arena that mattered.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.