From Pine View Farm

Culture Warriors category archive

R-E-S-P-E-C-T 0

Via C&L.

Share

Trumpling the Women 0

At the Boston Review, Kate Manne explores the relationship between sexism and misogyny as manifested in Donald Trump and his supporters. She argues that misogyny can be thought of as the enforcement mechanism for sexism: sexism is believing that women belong “in their place,” which is inherently inferior to and servile to men, while misogyny is a means of putting and keeping them there if they dare step foot beyond their prescribed bounds.

It is a long and thoughtful piece that warrants your attention. Here’s a bit.

Trump’s misogyny has given us vivid examples of the phenomenon at its crudest. Trump is in many ways the American id—especially for the white men who comprise the majority of his voter base. He has won millions of supporters, partly by holding up a mirror to a certain segment of the population, reflecting its anxieties, hopes, fantasies, and narcissism. To make American white men feel great again is Trump’s implicit promise. This will involve casting others down the relevant social hierarchies.

But his misogyny is, for better or worse, strictly limited. This is because of a striking and alarming limitation of Trump generally: he seems to lack a superego, or even the ability to mimic one. This explains both his remarkable shamelessness and the non-moralistic quality of his misogyny. It isn’t moralistic because Trump isn’t either. His normative words are simplistic and aesthetic terms of praise: “best,” “beautiful,” “great,” and “winning,” are some of his favorites. When he tries to engage in moral talk, he becomes uncharacteristically flummoxed.

Share

Toll of the Tarheel Potty Police 0

Image:  N. C. Governor McCrory raising arms in triumph while holding a paper saying


Click for the original image.

Share

Deplorable and Proud Of It, By Gum 0

Voter intimidation was what it was all about, was it not?

And, in more news of the deplorables . . .

The stupid. It burns.

Share

The Candidates Debate 0

Via C&L.

Share

The Trumplets of God 0

These folks worship no Jesus that I know.

Share

Arbiters of Civility 0

Genteel is as genteel does. This was not genteel.

As my mother would have said, “The nerve, the absolute nerve!” (She wouldn’t in a million years have said, ‘arrogant a$$hole,” so I’ll say it for her.)

Words fail me. (Well, no, they don’t, but I prefer not to sputter profanities in these electrons.)

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Frolicking with intent to stifle.

Share

Trumpling the Ladies 0

Aid to Donald Trump:   Good news, sir,  You have a plausible path to 270 . . . the number of women who say you groped them.


Click to see the image at its original location.

In related news, writing at Psychology Today Blogs, Azadeh Aalai explores the assumptions and behavior of rape culture as personified in Trumpery. Here’s just a bit of her long and thoughtful article; do please follow the link for the rest:

Women supporters for Trump held signs at a rally in NYC following the leak of these tapes that read, “Better to grab a pus*y than to be a pus*y.” This is rape culture—when the very genitalia of an entire sex of people is used to degrade and offend, to indicate inferiority and weakness. When the very language that is constructed within the culture is phallic-centric and elevates male body parts while undermining or shaming female body parts. When Shonda Rhimes, prominent writer and executive producer of hit ABC shows, shares in interviews that the censors would limit how many times the actors could say the word “vagina” on a medical-based television show, this reflects the taboo associated with the female body (in fact, her shows are credited with breaking the taboo of naming female genitalia, and has been identified as pioneering a new generation of shows that are more apt—and able—to use the term vagina on air). When in the aftermath of the leaked tapes, the Trump campaign (and his supporters) disregard his comments as “locker-room talk” that further indicates the insidiousness of rape culture.

The self-proclaimed party of “family values” has come out of the closet to reveal that “family values” was never anything more than a pick-up line for grabbing voters by the ba**ot.

Video via Boing-Boing.

Share

How Stuff Works, Mansplaining Dept. 0

Title:  The King of Mansplaining:  Sinking ship against iceberg in distance.  Ship's Captain in lifeboat says,


Click it image to see this and more like it.

Share

A Deplorable Calvacade 0

Now we switch to Spocko for the round-up.

Share

The Endorsement 0

Evangelical saying,

Click to see the image at its original location.

Share

Republicans Reach Out to Women 0

Title:  The GOP Outreach to Women.  Image: Arm wearing

Via Juanita Jean.

Share

“Some People Are More Equal Than Others”* 0

Andres Oppenheimer wonders why it took so long:

Since Trump announced his run for the presidency in mid-2015, he based much of his campaign on the premise that most Mexican immigrants are “rapists” and “criminals.” He has repeatedly insulted Muslims, as if all 1.6 billion of them were terrorists, and has publicly made fun of the physically handicapped. And with some notable exceptions, Republicans looked the other way.

Where were McCain, New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte, former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and dozens of other high-profile Republicans who didn’t break with Trump until the Oct. 7 release of Trump’s now infamous video?

Most of them, like McCain, explained that they had made their difficult decision because “I have daughters.” Where were they when Trump demonized Hispanics? Don’t they have any Hispanic friends?

Read the rest.

________________

*With apologies to George Orwell.

Share

The Cure 0

Share

Sleazy Is as Sleazy Thinks 0

I have two daughters. I never ever thought–I cannot conceive of having ever thought–of dating either one of them.

Guess I’m not Republican Presidential candidate material.

Pardon me now while I take a few moments to stop my skin from crawling.

Afterthought:

Today’s Republican Party is a vile and loathsome thing.

Share

The Bright Side 0

Dick Polman:

Hey, there’s good news for Donald Trump. No women have come forward to accuse of him of physical assault since 10:30 last night.

He goes on to point out that he’s writing in the morning, and no one knows what today might bring.

Meanwhile, in The Charlotte Observer, Keith Larson marvels at this coarse discourse (emphasis added–more at the link):

Even as I type, some in the United States Senate, including prominent social conservative Jeff Sessions (R-AL), are actually questioning whether grabbing a woman by the genitals constitutes sexual assault.

Share

“Minced Trump” 0

(Link fixed.)

Solomon Jones writes of his recent interview of Tim Kaine. Not surprisingly, the Trump Tape came up as a topic. Mr. Kaine did not mince words; he minced Trump. Here’s an excerpt; follow the link for the rest.

“I think there is no doubt that the behavior described in the (Trump) video is sexual assault,” Kaine told me. “You can’t grab people’s genitals. That’s sexual assault. I mean, it is clear. And I very much dismiss a Donald Trump who’s trying to say, ‘Well, this is locker room talk,’ or a Rudy Guiliani: ‘You know, this is kind of what men do.’

“No, it’s not. It’s what sexual abusers do, but it’s not what men do.”

I wholeheartedly agree. Talking about grabbing strange women by the genitals without their permission is not locker-room talk. It’s sociopath talk.

Share

Chartering a Course for Disaster 0

Share

As Ye Sow, So Shall Ye Reap* (Updated) 0

The Rude One points out that the Republican Party brought Trump on themselves. (He’s so upset he doesn’t even cuss.) Here’s a bit; follow the link for the rest:

We don’t get here without the 25 years of right-wing demonization of Hillary Clinton. We don’t get here without every fruitless investigation into something Clinton-related, all political retribution for Bill Clinton daring to be elected president and his wife daring to step out of the prescribed social role of First Lady. On NPR, the genuinely evil Michael Chertoff, who had various roles in the Bush II administration, said he was supporting Clinton this year. And while that is cause for alarm itself, here is what he said about how those investigations affected the safety of the country: “In looking back on that I realized that in the ’90s we spent an enormous amount of time pursuing issues involving the Clintons’ associations back in Arkansas in the ’80s, Whitewater and other things, and we didn’t spend nearly the same amount of time on what bin Laden was up to and others were up to in the region.” This is the guy who led the probe into the Whitewater land deal, one of the earliest and longest-lasting fake Clinton scandals. He says that Clinton derangement syndrome diverted attention away from real threats.

Today’s Republican base is a vile and loathsome thing, and the Republican Party did it to itself.

The Republican Party created its base when Richard Nixon decided to woo racist, segregationist bigots with his odious Southern Strategy. The bright minds–at least they called themselves the “bright minds,” as the old man back home would have said–of Nixon’s Republican Party believed that they could control and manipulate the rubes and hayseeds, as no doubt they conceived of them, to short-term political advantage.

Their plan succeeded so well that the rubes and hayseeds now control and manipulate them, to the peril of the polity.

________________________

*That’s not just scripture. It’s also sociology.

Addendum, Late That Same Night:

The peril to the polity manifests itself: This is the reaping of what the Republican Party’s hate-full, apocalyptic war on the Clintons over the past two and a half decades has sown.

Where is HUAC when you need them?

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.