Culture Warriors category archive
Speaking of “Them” . . . 0
. . . Marco Rubio is very, very afraid of “Them.”
“Them” 3
Back when spy movies were all the rage, James Bond was still played by Sean Connery, and the villains were always faceless underground organizations with names such as SPECTRE, SMERSH, and THRUSH, someone I forget who made a parody spy flick in which the bad guys represented a shadowy outfit called THEM. As I recall, the film’s silliness made anything by the Three Stooges look like high art (unfortunately, I can’t remember enough of it to find a citation).
Leonard Pitts, Jr., reminds me that the film may not have been as much parody as I thought at the time:
Us versus them.
As in, an implicit promise to defend the former against the latter. This was its mission when it pushed for immigration quotas in the 1920s, when it animated the Red Scare of the 1950s, when it defined civil rights as a clear and present danger in the 1960s, when hardhats rioted against hippies in 1970. It is its organizing principle even today, as red states pass legislation to protect themselves from Sharia law and some of us define religious persecution as baking a cake for a same-sex couple.
Us versus them.
Always, social conservatism defined “them” as something faceless and frightening against which the rest of “us” must struggle with everything we had, or else be overrun. It is an ideology that has contributed virtually nothing of value to the life of the nation — unless you count mindless panic as a good thing.
He goes on to wonder whether the appeal of such tactics may be waning.
I fear that he is wrong. Fear sells, and hate always finds buyers.
. . . B-B-But It Was Only “Family Research” 0
Putting aside the culture warrior schadenfreude, I think it might be a bit strong to refer to a 14-year-old boy trying to navigate the teenager hormone zone while growing up in a clearly screwed-up family in the same phrases that one might use for a 50-year-old man (or woman, as recent headlines tell us seems quite possible) lurking in the bushes next to the jungle gym in the playground.
Let’s just stick with the incest thing, okay?
Via Raw Story.
Macho Macho Men 0
Froma Harrop wonders who joins outlaw biker gangs. She gets an answer from James F. Quinn, a University of North Texas sociologist.
Women are not invited. Women are never members of a “1 percent club,” a reference to the tiny percentage of motorcyclists not considered law-abiding citizens. Women are there to serve, which is why the Waco bikers gravitated to a Hooters clone restaurant, where the waitresses wear tops cut low and shorts cut high.
Republican Family Values . . . 0
. . . continue to amaze.
When one so fetishizes sex as do the family-values Bible-thumpers, no good can result.
Republican Family Values . . . 0
. . . are as a sounding brass or a tinkling bell or, more accurately, a schtick for the rubes, a con, an act, a flim-flam.
Furrfu.
Motherhood and Apple Pie 0
Americans seem to be all for motherhood, except for the part about actually acting like a mother.
Jesus.










