From Pine View Farm

Culture Warriors category archive

Now Playing: Scribes and Pharisees in Modern Dress 0

Franklin Graham:  We need politicians to oppose the gay agenda. . . .  Voice from on high:  Love thy neighbor.  Franklin Graham:  . . . who will bar Muslim refugees . . . .  Voice from on high:  Welcome the stranger.  Franklin Graham:  . . . who only believe OUR Biblical values . . .  Voice from on high:  Judge not lest ye be judged.   Franklin Graham, pointing towards on high:  . . . and who will not believe left-wing propaganda.


Click for a larger image.

Share

Facebook Frolics, Fomenting Fear and Begetting Bigotry Dept. 0

Der Spiegel explores how the German right uses Facebook and other forms of “social” media to spread lies about Syrian refugees. Here’s a bit; follow the link for the rest:

In an e-mail, he (the person who first posted a story about refugees slaughtering and eating goats from a long-defunct petting zoo–ed.) insists that the incident at the petting zoo had been “confirmed by witnesses.” He had simply gotten “mixed up” about the place. It happened in Halberstadt, he says, about 60 kilometers from Lostau. There, a zookeeper could testify to everything, Knoche’s fellow party member says without providing a name. The man cannot be identified, he says, lest he risk losing his job.

“Utter nonsense,” says the director of the Halberstadt zoo, Marina Breitschuh. No one plundered the zoo, she adds, and all the animals, including the goats, are doing just fine. There are also no right-wingers threatened with termination among the zookeepers, she says. Breitschuh was, however, familiar with the rumor of the slaughtered goats, but the story she heard allegedly took place in Erfurt. One call to the Thuringian capital was all it took to confirm: no missing animals.

“This is a very common pattern,” says Andre Wolf from Mimikama, an online platform in Austria that fights Internet abuse. Once a fabricated story is clearly refuted, those behind it will often uproot it to another location and begin spreading the rumor there. “Some stories are like old acquaintances,” says Wolf. “They resurface every few weeks or months from the depths of the Internet.”

Sound familiar?

Share

None Dare Call It Terrorism 0

Meet the terrorists in Oregon. It’s a calvacade of crazy.

Share

Passing the Plate 0

Via C&L.

Share

Have Cake, Eat It Too 0

The infallible word of God, except when God’s funning wit’ you.

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.

Share

Pure Idiocy 0

Share

“Off We Go a-Caroling . . . .” 0

John Romano composes new carols for this holiday season.

Likely they will still be timely a year from now.

Share

The War on “Happy Holidays” 0

Its heritage might surprise you. A bit:

Now, the war on Christmas wasn’t always a joke. According to journalist Daniel Denvir, it was first created by anti-Semites in the 1920s as a way of attacking what they saw as an international Jewish conspiracy. Then it was briefly brought back to life in the mid-1950s by the far-right John Birch Society, which posited that the United Nations was targeting Christmas to advance the cause of global communism.

It then lay dormant until around 2004, when Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and a handful of Christian conservatives created the war on Christmas that we know today. They spun corporate America’s profit-driven tendency to wish consumers an inclusive “happy holidays” into a plot by godless liberals to banish Christianity from our holy shopping malls.

Share

Making a Hashtag of It 0

Elie Mystal comments on the Mall of America’s attempt to prevent a #BlackLivesMatters protest. A snippet (emphasis added):

The problem, according to Hennepin County Judge Karen Janisch, is that the mall can’t actually tell the court “who” #BlackLivesMatters is because it’s not a legally recognizable group. It’s a hashtag. You can’t ban a hashtag from your property.

And Mall of America certainly can’t ban black people from coming into it. They can’t restrict the activity of protesting until, at the very least, people actually start doing it. Otherwise you are just banning black people for something they might do, which is pretty damn racist.

Of course, Mall of America doesn’t want to ban black people. Black people can spend money too! They just don’t want black people to voice… anything of substance inside the mall, or disrupt other people’s attempts to spend money in the mall.

The concept that a mall is private space is morally, if not legally, flawed. In many communities, malls are for all practical purposes the downtowns of yesteryear, at least in the relatively few places where they have not yet been supplanted by big boxes. They want to be seen as public spaces, with shops and restaurants and recreation sometimes even exhibits of various types, as long as the public remains docile and compliant. Otherwise, otherwise.

And now for the rest of the story.

Share

“Nobody Ever Expects the Spanish Inquisition” 0

Virginia Tech Professor Matthew Gabriele points out that it’s happened before. Here’s a snippet from his piece on the recent panic over a calligraphy assignment in Augusta County, Virginia (emphasis added).

The interesting issue here is one of religion. What I mean is that the fear shown by Herndon (the person whose fears triggered the bigotry–ed.) and those who support her position is that study = advocacy . . . .

There is not so much distance between Bernard Gui’s 14th-century Manual for Inquisitors and the “indoctrination” that Herndon and others are, still, so worried about in Augusta County, Virginia.

Follow the link for the full discussion.

Share

An Apple Is Not an Orange, Even Though Both Are Round 0

In a fantastickal leap of bothsiderism, Dick Meyer argues that right-wingers who demand license for bigotry are somehow the same as (insert “whiny” here) college students who wish to be treated without bigotry.

Trumpism and Trumpistas fit a pattern of right-wing populism familiar in our history and Europe’s. They talk like they’re under siege, furious over their diminished security, prospects and status. They see themselves as the real underdogs, the real victims. They aren’t much interested in the sob stories of “less American” groups. They are disgusted by “the system” and in a mood to punish.

Similar fears and social anxieties, I suggest, are driving the current style of student activism.

It is preoccupied with safety and protection, physical but, even more, emotional. It seems more driven by insecurity than idealism. Colleges are asked to issue “trigger warnings” when presenting material that might be upsetting to students — for any imaginable reason. Commonplace words, phrases and behaviors are called out as offensive micro-aggressions even if there is no whiff of malice.

This is a case of trying to claim that hitting someone with a bowling ball is the same as hitting him or her with a ping-pong ball. It’s not. If you doubt me, I’ll happily hit you with my bowling ball upon receipt of a signed, witnessed, and notarized consent form.

The analogy breaks down when one realizes that none of the whiny college students that Meyer decries has yet tried to blow up a mosque or beat up a professor for being.

Granted, there have been a few instances of silliness on campus, but the examples of campus silliness are, frankly, relatively few and decidedly meek, though the Meyers of the world magnify them relentlessly.

Dennis Parker gets much closer to what is actually going on.

Far from being defenses of academic integrity and openness, those who dismiss the students only perpetuate a sad history of refusal to confront the continued existence of discrimination and inequality on campus. Recent articles, such as “The Coddling of the American Mind” in The Atlantic and other media, have described professors and students feeling so afraid that they will offend someone in class that they feel that the school has ceased to be a marketplace of ideas. Undoubtedly, some students are overly sensitive, but to equate this to the hurt and fear experienced by students and faculty called the n-word at their colleges, or feeling that their presence is only reluctantly tolerated as shown by their small numbers and the sense that they don’t belong, belittles the legitimate hurt that has its roots in the country’s long history of deliberate exclusion and subordination.

One more time, those who complain of “political correctness” desire permission to offend with impunity.

Follow the links to read the full articles.

Share

No Nobelists Need Apply 0

Share

Twits on Twitter 0

Suspended twits.

As Elon James White is fond of pointing out, sometimes the best thing to say is nothing.

Share

Plus Ca Change 0

China Hand points out an uncomfortable truth. A snippet:

When confronted by discriminatory speech and actions, some make the high-minded appeal to Americans’ better nature: “this isn’t us.”

T’aint so, unfortunately. It’s more like “this was us and, apparently, still is at least some of us and maybe a lot of us.”

And maybe “us” isn’t just anxious blue-collar xenophobes. Maybe “us” includes a big chunk of the political elite and the strategists who guide them.

Trump seizes upon the implicit and makes it explicit; that’s his offense. And his strength.

A history of the synergy between popular bigotry, political calculation, and institutionalized discrimination is enlightening.

The storyline isn’t “It Can’t Happen Here”; try “It Does Happen Here, and with Depressing Frequency”.

Follow the link for some of the real Murican history, the bits you won’t get taught in school.

They ain’t purty.

Share

The Ammosexual Impulse 0

Chauncey Devega, in a typically long and tightly reasoned post, traces the thread of ammosexuality through American history. Here’s a bit; follow the link for the rest.

While gun fetishists and conservatives obsess over their fantastically deranged belief that a firearm is a Constitutional “right,” one that in an age of drones and robotic killing would help them fight “tyranny” in America, leading scholar Richard Slotkin has insightfully observed that guns are also the ultimate suppressor of dissent and democratic discourse.

There are many examples of this at present. Armed white people, mostly men, have been brandishing weapons to intimidate Muslims in Texas. White, mostly male, open carry advocates, march in public with guns, intimidating the general public and those who disagree with them. After mass shooting incidents, Republican politicians suggest that gun violence is somehow the price for the “freedom” and “liberty” of gun ownership in America. For them, a country awash with guns and gun violence is inseparable from American Exceptionalism. This is a macabre and sick understanding of what makes America “great.” That gun violence apologists on the American Right-wing cannot think of some greater motivation for their worship of “American Exceptionalism” is a devastating indictment of the country’s civic health.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Merry frolics.

Share

Profiles in Courage 0

Now ain’t these forces just special?

Share

None Dare Call It Terrorism 0

Dennis Chinoy dares to ask the question:

That question is: Don’t recent events warrant that we curtail immigration of Christians to our shores in order to combat the threat of radical Christian terrorism?

Consider this: The mass shootings in Colorado by Christian fanatic Robert Lewis Dear followed his Internet proclamation, “Turn to JESUS or burn in hell […] WAKE UP SINNERS U CANT SAVE YOURSELF U WILL DIE AN WORMS SHALL EAT YOUR FLESH” (emphasis his). His terrorist act is the most recent of a series of assassinations and mass killings perpetrated in Christianity’s name, heinous crimes that should repulse us all.

(snip)

If Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and their ilk crying “Radical Islamic Terrorism” at the top of their lungs object to this substitution of Christian for Muslim, Bible for Koran, Old Testament injunctions for Sharia Law, then they are obliged to tell us how Muslim, Christian or Jewish zealots are any different from each other.

Follow the link for more.

Share

Christmas Blights 0

Frame One:  Man complaining about

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Stray Thought 0

You do not have to look into someone’s heart to know what he or she is like.

If a person’s actions are full of hate, so too is that person’s heart, regardless of what that person may say about his or her motives.

Share
From Pine View Farm
Privacy Policy

This website does not track you.

It contains no private information. It does not drop persistent cookies, does not collect data other than incoming ip addresses and page views (the internet is a public place), and certainly does not collect and sell your information to others.

Some sites that I link to may try to track you, but that's between you and them, not you and me.

I do collect statistics, but I use a simple stand-alone Wordpress plugin, not third-party services such as Google Analitics over which I have no control.

Finally, this is website is a hobby. It's a hobby in which I am deeply invested, about which I care deeply, and which has enabled me to learn a lot about computers and computing, but it is still ultimately an avocation, not a vocation; it is certainly not a money-making enterprise (unless you click the "Donate" button--go ahead, you can be the first!).

I appreciate your visiting this site, and I desire not to violate your trust.