From Pine View Farm

Drumbeats category archive

Establishmentarians 0

In longer post about (some) Republicans apparently unwillingness to support Ukraine against Russia’s invasion, long-time BJ blogger Betty Cracker writes:

Maybe the dwindling handful of GOP Russia hawks would rue that day, but the ascendent Trumpists in the House (and some in the Senate) would welcome a right-wing, ethno-Christianist conquest of Europe. They want that for this continent too and would merrily leave NATO allies to their fate, never mind that it would destroy American credibility in international affairs until the heat death of the sun.

I sure hope she’s wrong. Follow the link and draw your own conclusion

Share

The Call to Arms 0

Title:  The Beginning and End of Full Disclosuer War.  Image:  Mounted knight stands on a drawbridge with a cohort of warriors behind him.  Knight says,

Click to view the original image.

Share

War and Mongers of War 0

Sam argues that no credibility should today be given to those who mongered the Great and Glorious Patriotic War for a Lie in Iraq, regardless of how they in retrospect attempt to legitimatize their lies.

Share

War and Mongers of War 0

It was two decades ago that U. S. started the Great and Patriotic War for a Lie in Iraq. I remember standing outside in the smoking area at work. It was the same spot where we had stood and looked up at empty skies in the days following September 11. Though we were just a few miles east of Philadelphia International Airport under one of the approach routes, there were no planes for days . . . .

I was chatting with my boss (who was, by the way, one of the best bosses I ever had). He was opining that “Iraq will be sorry that we have a Texan for president.”

My response was simply, “Dave, I have a bad feeling out this.”

I take no comfort in my qualms having been justified.

That moment came to mind because of something my old friend Noz wrote yesterday about the run up to the Great and Patriotic War for a Lie in Iraq. Here’s a bit of his post:

Don’t buy the 20 years after the fact spin that the Iraq War only appeared senseless in retrospect. The ridiculousness of the idea was right there in the open from the start. Lots of people tried hard to tell the public how ridiculous it was, and they were mocked and marginalized for it. Meanwhile, the people who mocked and marginalized them mostly kept their influence to this day, without ever paying a real price for the death and destruction they made happen. That’s a big legacy of the Iraq War.

Share

War and Mongers of War 0

Der Spiegel has a fascination interview with historian Timothy Snyder focusing on Vladimir Putin’s Russia and its war on Ukraine. It goes into a depth not seen in most U. S. reporting.

Here’s a tiny little excerpt from Snyder’s remarks:

Putin is pursuing practical goals as well as ideological ones in Ukraine. The practical side is that he’s governing an oligarchic Russia which can’t be reformed as long as he is in power. Ukraine is extremely important for Putin because if democracy were to work there, it would look better than Russia. And that would be a real problem for Putin. Given that he can’t make things better in Russia, he tries to make the West look worse, beginning in Ukraine, in the minds of Russians, but also in reality. That’s why he supported Brexit and Donald Trump and fueled scandals in Germany.

Share

The Atomic Boob 0

Farron points out that, thanks to John Kelly, we narrowly escaped death by stupid.

But stupid remains a menace.

Share

Putin on the Fritz 0

Sergei Guriev, in an article at The Japan Times, argues that the future does not seem bright for Vladimir Putin.

. . . Putin’s war is worse than a crime; it is a fatal mistake that other potential invaders will learn not to repeat.

Follow the link for his reasoning.

Aside:

I fear that Guriev’s faith that others might learn from Putin’s mistakes (enumerated at the link) disregards the lessons of history. If history teaches us one thing, it is that humankind (especially succeeding generations) seems incapable of learning from history.

Read more »

Share

The Strategist 0

Caption:  Russian Collateral Damage.  Image:  Russian generals in conference.  One, pointing at a map, says,

Via Job’s Anger.

Share

Unmitigated Gall 0

Plus a textbook example of psychological projection.

Share

Putin on the Ritz 0

David talks with Jack Barsky, ex-KGB spy, about Putin’s motivations for invading Ukraine. I found that it helps puts events in Ukraine in some historical context.

Share

Putin on the Fritz 0

Title:  Delirium Tremens.

Click to view the original image.

Afterthought:

Me, I think Putin sees himself more as Peter than as Joe.

I also think he expected the people of Ukraine to welcome him, not to resist him.

He was wrong on both counts.

Share

Russian Impulses 0

A Rand gesture.

Aside:

This adulation of authoritarianism is appalling.

Share

Potempkin Pillages 0

Der Spiegel offers a long and detailed analysis of what’s currently happening as regards the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

I commend it to your attention.

Share

All That Was Old Is New Again 0

Der Spiegel interviews British historian Antony Beevor about Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

It is a fascinating read. Beevor sees many echoes of Russia’s imperial past (and echoes of previous military miscalculations) in what is happening right now. Here’s one exchange:

DER SPIEGEL: As of 1941, German troops had invaded the Soviet Union, devastated large parts of Eastern Europe and perpetrated horrific massacres. Is the self-imposed task of fighting National Socialism – both the real manifestation in the past and the fictitious one in Ukraine – another parallel between Stalin and Putin? In your book “Berlin,” you concluded that because of that mission, the Red Army “could behave entirely as it liked, both personally and politically.”

Beevor: Putin’s distorted mindset, obsessed with the triumphant war against Nazism, has turned everything inside out. Isn’t it a great propaganda task to liberate the enemy of Nazism? Putin and his ideologues grotesquely depict the Ukrainians as born-again Nazis who need to be eliminated and re-educated, as the utterly manic article in RIA Novosti by Timofei Sergeitsev describes. The role of liberator from Nazism did indeed give the Red Army the idea that it could behave as it wanted both personally and politically. It was a notion of superiority. Rights of conquest meant not only imposing a Soviet regime on neighboring states. It also involved the comprehensive looting of the country as a form of reparation, and the idea that what Ilya Ehrenburg called “the blonde witch” – German women and girls – should pay for their menfolk’s crimes in the Russian motherland.

Share

Psychopaths on the War Paths 0

Does this remind you of anyone in the news?

Share

Supply Change 0

Ukraine is a major exporter of grain.

Der Spiegel takes an in-depth look at the implications of Putin’s war for the world’s food supply. It is disquieting.

A snippet:

The grain produced by the region’s fertile soil is vital for the global food system. In combination with Russia, whose exports have also collapsed as a result of sanctions, Ukraine covers around 30 percent of the world’s wheat exports and roughly 15 percent of corn and barley exports. And the two countries are responsible for fully two-thirds of all global exports of sunflower oil. According to one study, the two countries produce around 12 percent of all calories consumed in the world.

Now that a significant share of this supply has vanished from the tightly woven global market, it has created a shockwave that can be felt in many areas of the world . . . .

Share

Russian Impulses 0

The Arizona Republic’s E. J. Montini tries to remember, just what was the word for providing aid and comfort to an enemy?

Share

Suffer the Children 0

Der Spiegel visits a children’s hospital in Mariupol, Ukraine.

Share

Russian Impulses 0

At the Arizona Republic, E. J. Montini comments on the Republicans who are supporting Vladimir Putin’s aggression in Ukraine. A snippet:

Also recently, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called the Putin wing* “lonely voices” and said, “I wouldn’t pay much attention to them.”

I bet he would if they were Democrats.

______________________

*A reference to Congresswoman Liz Cheney’s characterizing the Republicans who voted against sanctions against Russia as the “Putin wing” of the Republican Party.

Share

Facebook Frolics 0

Crypto criming.

Share