Gunnuttery category archive
“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0
Brendan explains how it works.
“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0
Possibly polite practice rounds?
The Honda headed east toward the Dumbarton Bridge, police said. The whereabouts of the car, which reportedly had two occupants, was unknown late Saturday.
“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0
Politeness on the hoof.
“She flashed her lights to warn the males that she was behind them,” the police report said. “The suspects walked off to the side of the road so the victim could pass. After the victim drove past the males, one of the males fired several shots at the victim’s vehicle.”
“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0
Dick Polman hands out the “Well-Regulated Militia Awards.” A sample:
In related news, Maine man gets time for stealing courtesy:
Frankly, I’m mildly surprised the gunnuttery was not analyzed by Krafft-Ebing.
“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0
Guns fuel the drive for courtesy.
The road-rage incident began about 7:30 a.m. near 91st Street and Metcalf Avenue, police Capt. Todd Chappell said.
Gun Nut Paradise Approacheth Apace 0
It’s not even slowing down, is it?
The shooting happened about 12:20 p.m. at the campus at 2700 W. W. Thorne, near Aldine Westfield, according to the Harris County Sheriff’s Office.
At least two of the victims were wounded in the shooting and rushed to Ben Taub General Hospital. One of them was critically wounded. Details about the other person’s wound and condition were not released.
Via the Daily Banter.
“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0
Zandar zones in on the WATB factor in gunnuttery:
“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” (Updated, Kicked to the Top) 0
You can’t make this stuff up:
They can’t even be trusted amongst their own kind.
Follow the link for the inventory.
Addendum:
Noz explains what it means.
A Picture Is Worth 0
From a study by the Combatting Terrorism Center of the United States Military Academy:

Conservatives are claiming that the report is biased, apparently because it’s based on facts and numbers and stuff that actually happened.
Afghanistanization 0
In the San Jose Mercury-News, Jason Dempsey asks,
Follow the link to find out why he asks.
Sicko Semper Tyrannis 0
Reg Henry takes on gun nuts’ pretzel logic. A snippet:
But if guns were used in an effort to overthrow a tyrannical government, guess who the enemy would be? Why, those same men and women of the Armed Forces marching under that same grand old flag. The president, if a reminder is needed, is their commander in chief.
(snip)
. . . the word “tyrant” has been devalued and dumbed down to the point of meaninglessness. What we have is a government that some people don’t like . . . .
Elsewhere, PoliticalProf considers the properties of gunnuttery.
“An Armed Society Is a Polite Society” 0
A “Well-Regulated” Militia 0
Thom covers the politics of the origins of the Second Amendment.
It was all about fear of slave revolts.
Watch a follow-up discussion here. (It gets lively at about the eight minute mark.)
See additional comment at Bob Cesca’s place.
Chattel slavery is America’s original sin. It stains us still.
What You Don’t Know Won’t Hurt Them 0
Dick Polman reviews the gun nuts’ war against facts. A nugget:
In 1992 and 1993, a team of respected gun research experts – financed and sponsored by the CDC – concluded that keeping guns in the home actually increased the risk of homicide and suicide in the home. The studies were published in the New England Journal of Medicine (homicide study, here). The gun lobby freaked out. The studies flatly contradicted the lobby’s contention that guns in homes make people safer.
The gun manufacturers freaked out, too. If word got around that gun-owning households were less safe – and, worse yet, if future researchers came to that same conclusion – gun manufacturers might sell fewer guns. And since the abiding goal is to increase revenue and maximize profits, the solution back then was obvious. Future gun violence research had to be squelched.
Read the rest.











